PREVENTIVE DETENTION ACT,
1950 THE
PREVENTIVE DETENTION ACT, 1950 [Act
No. 04 of 1950][1] [25th
February, 1950] An
Act to provide for preventive detention in certain cases and matter connected
therewith Be it enacted by Parliament as
follows:-- (1)
This
Act may be called the Preventive Detention Act, 1950. (2)
[2][It extends to the
whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.] (3)
It
shall cease to have effect on the [3][31st
day of December, 1969], save as respects things done or omitted to be done
before that date. In this Act unless the context
otherwise requires,-- (1)
[4]["State
Government" in relation to a Union Territory, means the Administrator
thereof;] (2)
"detention
order" means an order made under Sec. 3; 2[and] (3)
[5]["appropriate
Government" means, as respects a detention order made by the Central
Government, or a person detained under such order, the Central Government, and
as respects a detention order made by a State Government or by an officer
subordinate to a State Government or as respects a person detained under such
order, the State Government.] (1)
The
Central Government or the State Government may? (a)
if
satisfied with respect to any person that with a view to preventing him from
acting in any manner prejudicial to? (b)
the
defence of India, the relations of India with foreign persons, or the security
of India, or (c)
the
security of the State or the maintenance of public order, or (d)
the
maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community; or (e)
if
satisfied with respect to any person who is a foreigner within the meaning of
the Foreigners Act, 1946 (31 of 1946), that with a view to regulating his
continued presence in India or with a view to making arrangements for his
expulsion from India it is necessary so to do, make an order directing that
such person be detained. (2)
[6][Any of the following
officers, namely: (a)
District
Magistrates, (b)
Additional
District Magistrates specially empowered in this behalf by the State
Government, (c)
[7][the Commissioner of
Police for Bombay, Calcutta, Madras or Hyderabad, (d)
Collectors
in the [8][territories
which immediately before the 1st November, 1956, were comprised in the State of
Hyderabad], may]if satisfied as provided in sub-clauses (ii) and (iii) of Cl.
(a) of sub-section (1), exercise the power conferred by the said sub-section. (3)
When
any order is made under this section [9][by
any officer mentioned in sub-section (2)] he shall forthwith report the fact to
the State Government to which he is subordinate together with the grounds on
which the order has been made and such other particulars as in his
opinion [10][have
a bearing on the matter, and no such order made after the commencement of
Preventive Detention (Second Amendment) Act, 1952 (61 of 1952), shall remain in
force for more than twelve days after the making thereof unless in the meantime
it has been approved by the State Government.] (4)
[11][When any order is
made or approved by the State Government under this section, the State
Government shall, as soon as may be, report the fact to the Central Government
together with the grounds on which the order has been made and such other
particulars as in the opinion of the State Government has a bearing on the
necessity for the order.] [12][A detention order
may be executed at any place in India in the manner provided for the execution
of warrants of arrest under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (5 of 1898)[13].]
Preamble
- THE PREVENTIVE DETENTION ACT, 1950PREAMBLE
Section 4 - Power to regulate place and conditions of detention
[14][Every person in
respect of whom a detention order has been made shall be liable--
(a)
to
be detained in such place under such conditions, including conditions as to
maintenance, discipline and punishment for breaches of discipline, as the
appropriate Government, may by general or special order specify; and
(b)
to
be removed from one place of detention to another place of detention whether
within the same State or in another State, by order of the appropriate
Government:
Provided that no order shall be made by
a State Government under Cl. (b) for the removal of a person from one State to
another State except with the consent of the Government of that other State.]
Section 5 - Detention orders not to be invalid or inoperative on certain grounds
No detention order shall be invalid or
inoperative merely by reason--
(a)
that
the person to be detained thereunder is outside the limits of the territorial
jurisdiction of the Government or officer making the order, or
(b)
that
the place of detention of such person is outside the said limits.]
Section 6 - Powers in relation to absconding persons
(1)
[15]If the Central
Government or the State Government or an officer specified in sub-section (2)
of section 3, as the case may be, has reason to believe that a person in
respect of whom a detention order has been made has absconded or is concealing
himself so that the order cannot be executed, that Government or officer may?
(a)
make
a report in writing of the fact to a Presidency Magistrate or a Magistrate of
the first class having jurisdiction in the place where the said person
ordinarily resides; and thereupon the provisions of Sees. 87, 88 and 89 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (5 of 1898)2 shall apply in
respect of the said person and his property as if the order directing that he
be detained where a warrant issued by the Magistrate;
(b)
by
order notified in the official Gazette directing the said person to appear
before such officer, at such place and within such period as may be specified
in the order; and if the said person fails to comply with such direction he
shall, unless he proves that it was not possible for him to comply therewith
and that he had, within the period specified in the order, informed the officer
mentioned in the order of the reason which rendered compliance therewith
impossible and of his whereabouts, be punishable with imprisonment for a term
which may extend to one year or with fine or with both.
(2)
[16][Notwithstanding
anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (5 of 1898),[17] every
offence under Cl. (b) of sub-section (1) shall be cognizable.]
Section 7 - Grounds of order of detention to be disclosed to persons affected by the order
(1)
When
a person is detained in pursuance of a detention order, the authority making
the order shall, [18][as
soon as may be, but not later than five days from the date of detention],
communicate to him the grounds on which the order has been made, and shall
afford him the earliest opportunity of making a representation [19][against
the order to the appropriate Government].
(2)
Nothing
in sub-section (1) shall require the authority to disclose facts which it
considers to be against the public interest to disclose.
Section 8 - Constitution of Advisory Boards
(1)
The
Central Government and each State Government shall, whenever necessary
constitute one or more Advisory Boards for the purposes of this Act.
(2)
Every
such Board shall consist of [20][three]
persons who are, or have been or are qualified to be appointed as, Judges of a
High Court, and such persons shall be appointed by the Central Government or
the State Government, as the case may be.
(3)
[21][***]
(4)
[22][The appropriate
Government shall appoint one of the members of the Advisory Board who is or has
been a Judge of a High Court to be its Chairman, and in the case of a [23][Union
territory] the appointment to the Advisory Board, or any person who is Judge of
the High Court of a [24][State]
shall be with the previous approval of the State Government:
Provided that nothing in this
sub-section shall affect the power of any Advisory Board constituted before the
commencement of the Preventive Detention (Second Amendment) Act, 1952 (61 of
1952), to dispose of any reference under section 9 pending before it at such
commencement.]
Section 9 - Reference to Advisory Boards
[25][ In every case where
a detention order has been made under this Act the appropriate Government
shall, within thirty days from the date of detention under the order place
before the Advisory Board constituted by it under section 8 the grounds on
which the order has been made and the representation, if any, made by the
person affected by the order and in case where the order has been made by an
officer also the report by such officer under sub-section (5) of section 3.]
Section 10 - Procedure of Advisory Boards
(1)
[26][The Advisory Board
shall after considering the materials placed before it and, after calling for
such further information as it may deem necessary from the appropriate
Government or from any person called for the purpose through the appropriate
Government or from the person concerned, and if in any, particular case it
considers it essential so to do or if the person concerned desires to be heard,
after hearing him in person, submit its report to the appropriate Government
within ten weeks from the date of detention.]
(2)
The
report of the Advisory Board shall specify in a separate part thereof the
opinion of the Advisory Board as to whether or not there is sufficient cause
for the detention of the person concerned.
(3)
[27][When there is a
difference of opinion among the members forming the Advisory Board, the opinion
of the majority of such members shall be deemed to be the opinion of the
Board.]
(4)
Nothing
in this section shall entitle any person against whom a detention order has
been made [28][***]
to appear by any [29][legal
practitioner] in any matter connected with the reference to the Advisory Board,
and the proceedings of the Advisory Board and its report, excepting that part
of the report in which the opinion of the Advisory Board is specified shall be
confidential.
Section 11 - Action upon the report of Advisory Board
(1)
[30][In any case where
the Advisory Board has reported that there is in its opinion sufficient cause
for the detention of a person, the appropriate Government may confirm the
detention order and continue the detention of the person concerned for such
period as it thinks fit.
(2)
In
any case where the Advisory Board has reported that there is in its opinion no
sufficient cause for the detention of the persons concerned, the appropriate
Government shall revoke the detention order and cause the person to be released
forthwith.]
Section 11A - Maximum period of detention
(1)
[31][ The maximum period
for which any person may be detained in pursuance of any detention order which
has been confirmed under section 11 shall be twelve months from the date of
detention.
(2)
Notwithstanding
anything contained in sub-section (1), every detention order which has been
confirmed under section 11 before the commencement of the Preventive Detention
(Second Amendment) Act, 1952 (61 of 1952), shall, unless a shorter period is
specified in the order, continue to remain in force until the 1st day of April,
1953, or until the expiration of twelve months from the date of detention,
whichever period of detention expires later.
(3)
The
provisions of sub-section (2) shall have effect notwithstanding anything to the
contrary contained in section 3 of the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act,
1952 (61 of 1952), but nothing contained in this section shall affect the power
of the appropriate Government to revoke or modify the detention order at any earlier
time.]
Section 12 - Validity and duration of detention in certain cases
[32][ For the avoidance
of doubt it is hereby declared that--
(a)
every
detention order in force at the commencement of the Preventive Detention
(Amendment) Act, 1951 (4 of 1951), shall continue in force and shall have
effect as if it had been made under this Act as amended by the Preventive
Detention (Amendment) Act, 1951 (4 of 1951); and
(b)
nothing
contained in sub-section (3) of section 1 or sub-section (1) of section 12 of
this Act as originally enacted shall be deemed to affect the validity or
duration of any such order.]
Section 13 - Revocation of detention orders
(1)
Without
prejudice to the provisions of Section 21 of the General Clauses Act,
1897 (10 of 1897), a detention order may at any time be revoked or modified?
(a)
notwithstanding
that the order has been made by an officer mentioned to sub-section (2) of
section by the State Government to which that officer is subordinate or by
Central Government
(b)
notwithstanding
that the order has been made by a State Government, or by the Central
Government,
(2)
[33][The revocation of
expiry of a detention order shall not bar the making of a fresh detention order
under section 3 against the same person in any case where fresh facts have
arisen after the date of revocation or expiry on which the Central Government
or a State Government or an officer, as the case may be, is satisfied that such
the order should be made.
Section 14 - Temporary release of persons detained
(1)
[34][The appropriate
Government may at any time direct that any person detained in pursuance of a
detention order may be released for any specified period either without
conditions or upon such conditions specified in the directions as that person
accepts, and may at any time cancel his release.
(2)
In
directing the release of any person under sub-section (1), the appropriate
Government may require him to enter into a bond with or without sureties for
the due observance of the conditions specified in the direction.
(3)
Any
person released under sub-section (1) shall surrender himself at the time and
place, and to the authority, specified in the order directing his release or
cancelling his release, as the case may be.
(4)
If
any person fails without sufficient cause to surrender himself in the manner
specified in sub-section (3), he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a
term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or both.
(5)
If
any person released under sub-section (1) fails to fulfil any of the conditions
imposed upon him under the said sub-section or in the bond entered into by him
the bond shall be declared to be forfeited and any person bound thereby shall
be liable to the penalty thereof.]
Section 15 - Protection of action taken under the Act
No suit, prosecution or other legal
proceedings shall lie against any person for anything in good faith done or
intended to be done in pursuance of this Act.
Section 16 - Repeal
The Preventive Detention (Extension of
Duration) Order, 1950, is hereby repealed.Preventive Detention: Nature and scope.--Article 22 of the Constitution
cannot be read in isolation but must be read along with Articles
19 and 21. Article 22(3)(b) which permits preventive detention
is not itself a fundamental right but only an exception to Article
21 an exception can apply only in rare and exceptional cases and it cannot
override the main rule Article 21 is the most important of the
fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution of India Right to liberty
quarreled by Article 21 implies that before a person is imprisoned a
trial must ordinarily be held giving him full opportunity of hearing and that
too through a lawyer, be cause a layman would not be able to property defend
himself except through a lawyer. Since clause (3) of Article 22 specifically
excludes the applicability of clauses (1) and (2), the detenu is not entitled
to a lawyer or the right to be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours of
arrest Fundamental rights are meant for protecting the civil liberties of the people
and not to put them in jail for a long period without recourse to all lawyer
and without a trial It is well to say that preventive detention is preventive
not a punitive. The truth of the matter, though is that in substance a
detention order of a year or more is a punishment. Whet difference is to the
detenu whether his imprisonment is called preventive or punitive Further, in
cases of preventive detention no offence is proved and the justification of
such detention is suspicions or reasonable probability and there is no
conviction which can only be warranted by legal evidence. Preventive detention
is often described as a "jurisdiction of suspicion" The detaining
authority passes the order of detention on subjective satisfaction Preventive
detention is, by nature, repugnant to democratic ideas and an anathema to the
rule of law. No such law exists in the U.S.A. and in U.K. (except during was
time) Since, Article 22(3)(b) of the constitution of India permits
preventive detention, it cannot be held illegal. But the power of preventive
detention must be confined to very narrow limits, otherwise the great right to
liberty won by the Founding Fathers of the Constitution of India will become
nugatory.[35]
[1]
For statement of
Objects and Reasons, see Gazette of India, Extra., 1950, p. 831.
[2] Substituted
by Act 51 of 1954.
[3] Substituted
by Act 48 of 1966, Section 2.
[4] Substituted by A.L.O.
(No. 3), 1956.
[5] Inserted by Act
4 of 1951.
[6] Substituted by the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act, 1950 (50 of
1950), for "any District Magistrate or Sub-divisional Magistrate or, in a
Presidency-town the Commissioner of Police may."
[7] Substituted by the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act,
1951 (4 of 1951), for Clauses (c), (d) and (e).
[8] ?Substituted by A.L., (No. 3)
O., 1956, for "State of Hyderabad".
[9] Substituted by Act 50 of 1950, for "by a District Magistrate,
Sub-Divisional Magistrate or Commissioner of Police".
[10] Substituted by Act 61 of 1952, for "having a bearing on the
necessity for the order".
[11] Inserted by Act 61 of 1952.
[12] Inserted by Act
4 of 1951.
[13] See new Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974).
[14] Substituted
by Act 4 of 1951.
[15] Section 6 was
renumbered as sub-section (1) of that section and after this section as is
renumbered sub-section (2) was Inserted by Act 61 of 1952, Section 5.
[16] Substituted
by Act 61 of 1962, Section 5.
[17] See new Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974).
[18] Ibid., Section 6, for
"as soon as may be".
[19] Substituted by the Preventive
Detention (Amendment) Act, 1951 (4 of 1951).
[20] ?Substituted by Act 4 of
1951, for "two".
[21] Proviso to sub-section (2) was omitted by Act 61 of 1952.
[22] Inserted by ibid.
[23] Substituted by A.L.O. (No. 3), 1956, for "Part C State".
[24] Substituted by ibid., for "Part A State or a Part B State".
[25]
Substituted
by Act 61 of 1952.
[26] Inserted by Act
4 of 1951.
[27] Inserted by Act
4 of 1951.
[28]
The words "to
attend in person or" were omitted by Act 61 of 1952.
[29]
Substituted by ibid.,
for "Legal representative".
[30] Substituted
by Act 4 of 1951.
[31] Inserted by Act
61 of 1952.
[32] Substituted
by Act 4 of 1951.
[33] Substituted
by Act 61 of 1952.
[34] Inserted by
the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act, 1951 (4 of 1951). The
original section 14 was omitted by the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act,
1950 (50 of 1950).
[35] Rekha v. State of
Tamil Nadu, (2011) 5 SCC 244 relying on A.K. Roy v. Union of India, (1982) 1
SCC 271: AIR 1982 SC 710: 1982 Cr LJ 340; M. Nagaraj v. Union of India, (2006)
8 SCC 212: AIR 2007 SC 71: 2006 AIR SCW 5482; I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil
Nadu, (2007) 2 SCC 1: AIR 2007 SC 861: 2007 AIR SCW 611.