HIGH COURT OF
UTTARAKHAND VIDEO CONFERENCING RULES, 2020
PREAMBLE
Whereas it is expedient to consolidate, unify and
streamline the procedure relating to use of video conferencing for Courts; and
In exercise of its powers under Articles 225 and
227 of the Constitution of India the High Court of Uttarakhand, (with the
approval of Government of Uttarakhand vide letter no.
344/XXXVI-A-1/2020-342/2020 dated 26.11.2020) makes the following Rules:
CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY
Rule - 1. Short title and commencement.
(i) These Rules shall be called the
''High Court of Uttarakhand[1] Video Conferencing Rules,
2020".
(ii) These Rules shall apply to such
courts or proceedings or classes of courts or proceedings and on and from such
date as the High Court may notify in this behalf.
Rule - 2. Definitions.
In these Rules, unless the context otherwise
requires:
(i) "Advocate" means and
includes an advocate entered in any roll maintained under the provisions of the
Advocates Act, 1961 and shall also include government pleaders/advocates and
officers of the department of prosecution.
(ii) "Commissioner" means a
person appointed as commissioner under the provisions of Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908, or the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or any other law in
force.
(iii) "Coordinator" means a
person nominated as coordinator under Rule 5.
(iv) "Court" includes a
physical court and a virtual Court or tribunal.
(v) "Court Point" means the
courtroom or one or more places where the Court is physically convened, or the
place where a Commissioner or an inquiring officer holds proceedings pursuant
to the directions of the Court.
(vi) "Court User" means a
user participating in court proceedings through video conferencing at a Court
Point.
(vii) "Designated Video
Conferencing Software" means software provided by the High Court from time
to time to conduct video conferencing.
(viii) "Exceptional
circumstances" include illustratively a pandemic natural calamities,
circumstances implicating law and order and matters relating to the safety of
the accused and witnesses.
(ix) "Remote Point" is a
place where any person or persons are required to be present or appear through
a video link.
(x) "Remote User" means a
user participating in court proceedings through video conferencing at a Remote
Point.
(xi) "R squired Person"
includes:
(a) the person who is to be examined;
or
(b) the person in whose presence
certain proceedings are to be recorded or conducted; or
(c) an Advocate or a party in person
who intends to examine a witness; or
(d) any person who is required to
make submissions before the Court; or
(e) any other person who is permitted
by the Court to appear through video conferencing.
(xii) "Virtual Court" means
and includes a Court conducted by way of Video Conferencing.
(xiii) "Video Conferencing"
means and includes a conference conducted through live link.
(xiv) "Live Link" means and
includes a live television link, audio-video electronic means or other
arrangements whereby a witness, a required person or any other person permitted
to remain present, while physically absent from the Courtroom is nevertheless
virtually present in the Courtroom by remote communication using technology to
give evidence and be cross-examined.
(xv) "Rules" shall mean
these Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts and any reference to a Rule,
Sub-rule or Schedule shall be a reference to a rule, Sub-rule or Schedule of
these Rules.
CHAPTER II GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Rule - 3. General Principles Governing Video Conferencing.
(i) Video conferencing facilities may
be used at all stages of judicial proceedings and proceedings conducted by the
Court.
(ii) All proceedings conducted by a
Court by way of video conferencing shall be judicial proceedings and all the
courtesies and protocols applicable to a physical court shall apply to these
virtual proceedings.
(iii) All relevant statutory provisions
applicable to judicial proceedings including provisions of the CPC, Cr.P.C.,
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (abbreviated hereafter,
as the Evidence Act), Oaths Act, 1969 and Information Technology Act, 2000
(abbreviated hereafter as the IT Act), shall apply to proceedings conducted by
video conferencing.
(iv) Subject to maintaining
independence, impartiality and credibility of judicial proceedings and subject
to such directions as the High Court may issue, Courts may adopt such
technological advances as may become available from time to time.
(v) The Rules as applicable to a
Court shall mutatis mutandis apply to a Commissioner appointed by the Court to
record evidence and to an Inquiry officer conducting an inquiry.
(vi) There shall be no unauthorised
recording of the proceedings by any person or entity.
(vii) The person defined in Rule 2(xi)
shall provide identity proof as recognised by the Government of India/State
Government/Union Territory to the Court point coordinator via personal email.
In case identity proof is not readily available the person concerned shall
furnish the following personal details: name, parentage and permanent address,
as also, temporary address if any.
Rule - 4. Facilities recommended for Video Conferencing.
The following equipment is recommended for
conducting proceedings by video conferencing at the Court Point and at the Remote
Point
(i) Desktop, Laptop, mobile devices
with internet connectivity and printer;
(ii) Device ensuring uninterrupted
power supply;
(iii) Camera;
(iv) Microphones and speakers;
(v) Display unit;
(vi) Document Visualizer;
(vii) Provision of a firewall;
(viii) Adequate seating arrangements
ensuring privacy;
(ix) Adequate lighting; and
(x) Availability of a quiet and
secure space
Rule - 5. Preparatory Arrangements.
5.1. There shall be a Coordinator both at the Court Point and at the
Remote Point. However Coordinator may be required at the Remote Point only when
a witness or an accused is to be examined.
5.2. In the civil and criminal Courts falling within the purview of the
district judiciary, persons nominated by the High Court or the concerned
District Judge, shall perform the functions of Coordinators at the Court Point
as well as the Remote Point as provided in Rule 5.3:
5.3. The Coordinator at the Remote Point may be any at the following:
Sub-Rule |
Where the Advocate or Required Person is at the
fallowing Remote Point- |
The Remote Point Coordinator shall be:- |
5.3.1 |
Overseas |
An official of an Indian Consulate/the relevant
Indian Embassy/the relevant High Commission of India. |
5.3.2 |
Court of another state or union territory within
the territory of India. |
Any authorized official nominated by the
concerned District Judge. |
5.3.3 |
Mediation Centre or office of District Legal
Services Authority (including Taluka Legal Services Committee). |
Any authorized official nominated by the
Chairperson or Secretary of the concerned District Legal Services Authority. |
5.3.4 |
Jail or prison |
The concerned Jail Superintendent or Officer
in-charge of the prison. |
5.3.5 |
Hospitals administered by the Central Government
the State Government or local bodies, |
Medical Superintendent or an official authorized
by them or the person in charge of the said Hospital. |
5.3.6 |
Observation Home, Special Home, Children's Home,
Shelter Home, or any institution referred to as a child facility
(collectively referred to as child facilities) and where the Required Person
is a juvenile or a child or a person who is an inmate of such child facility. |
The Superintendent or Officer in charge of that
child facility or an official authorized by them. |
5.3.7 |
Women's Rescue Homes, Protection Homes, Shelter
Homes, Nari Niketans or any institution referred to as a women's facility
(collectively referred to as women's facilities). |
The Superintendent or Officers in-charge of the
women's facility or an official authorized by them. |
5.3.8 |
In custody, care or employment of any other
government office, organization or institution (collectively referred to as
institutional facilities). |
The Superintendent or Officers in-charge of the
institutional facility or an official authorized by them. |
5.3.9 |
Forensic Science Lab |
The Administrative officer in-charge or their
nominee. |
5.3.10 |
In case of any other location |
The concerned Court may appoint any person deemed
fit and proper who is ready and willing to render their services as a
Coordinator to ensure that the proceedings are conducted in a fair, impartial
and independent manner and according to the directions issued by the Court in
that behalf. |
5.4 When a Required Person is at any of the Remote Points mentioned in
Sub-rules 5.3 and video conferencing facilities are not available at any of
these places the concerned Court will formally request the District Judge, in
whose jurisdiction the Remote Point is situated to appoint a Coordinator for
and to provide a video conferencing facility from proximate and suitable Court
premises.
5.5 The Coordinators at both the Court Point and Remote Point shall
ensure that the recommended requirements set out in Rule 4 are complied with,
so that the proceedings are conducted seamlessly.
5.6 The Coordinator at the Remote Point shall ensure that
5.6.1 All Advocates and/or
Required Persons scheduled to appear in a particular proceeding are ready at
the Remote Point designated for video conferencing at least 30 minutes before
the scheduled time.
5.6.2 No unauthorised recording
device is used.
5.6.3 No unauthorised person
enters the video conference room when the video conference is in progress.
5.6.4 The person being examined
is not prompted, tutored, coaxed, induced or coerced in any manner by any
person and that the person being examined does not refer to any document,
script or device without the permission of the concerned Court during the
course of examination.
5.6.5 At the end of the proceedings,
the coordinator at the Remote Point shall give a certificate that the
proceedings were conducted in accordance with these rules. The certificate
shall be sent to the coordinator at the Court Point through email immediately
after the proceedings and a hard copy of it duly signed by the coordinator at
the remote point shall be sent to the Court Point within 24 hours.
5.7 Where the witness to be examined through video conferencing
requires or if it is otherwise expedient to do so, the Court shall give
sufficient notice in advance, setting out the schedule of video conferencing
and in appropriate cases may transmit non-editable digital scanned copies of
all or any part of the record of the proceedings to the if official email
account of the coordinator of the concerned Remote Point designated in
accordance with Rule 5.3.
5.8 Subject to the provisions for examination of witnesses contained in
the Evidence Act, before the examination of the witness, the documents, if any,
sought to be relied upon by any party shall be transmitted by such party to the
witness, so that the witness acquires familiarity with the said documents, such
party will file an acknowledgment with the Court in this behalf.
5.9 Before the scheduled video conferencing date, the Coordinator at
the Court Point shall ensure that the Coordinator at the Remote Point receives
documents certified copies, printouts or a soft copy of the non-editable
scanned copies of all or any part of the record of proceedings which may be
required for recording statements or evidence, or for reference. However, these
shall be permitted to be used by the Required Person only with the permission
of the Court.
5.10 Whenever required the Court shall order the Coordinator at the
Remote Point or at the Court Point to provide
5.10.1 A translator in case the
person to be examined is not conversant with the official language of the
Court.
5.10.2 An expert in sign
languages in case the person to be examined is impaired in speech and/or
hearing.
5.10.3 An interpreter or a
special educator, as the case may be, in case a person to be examined is
differently abled, either temporarily or permanently.
CHAPTER III
PROCEDURE FOR VIDEO CONFERENCING
Rule - 6. Application for Appearance, Evidence and Submission by Video Conferencing.
6.1 Any party to the proceeding or witness, save
and except where proceedings are initiated at the instance of the Court, may
move a request for video conferencing.
A party or witness seeking a video conferencing
proceeding shall do so by making a request in the form prescribed in Schedule
I.
6.2 Any proposal to move a request to for video
conferencing should first be discussed with the other party or parties to the
proceeding, except where it is not possible or inappropriate, for example in
cases such as urgent applications.
6.3 On receipt of such a request and upon hearing
all concerned persons, the Court will pass an appropriate order after
ascertaining that the application is not filed with an intention to impede a
fair trial or to delay the proceedings.
6.4 While allowing a request for video
conferencing, the Court may also fix the schedule for convening the video
conferencing.
6.5 In case the video conferencing, event is
convened for making oral submissions, the order may require the Advocate or
party in person to submit written arguments and precedents, if any, in advance
on the official email ID of the concerned Court.
Rule - 7. Service of Summons.
7.1 Summons issued to a witness who is to be
examined through video conferencing, shall mention the date, time end venue of
the concerned Remote Point and shall direct the witness to attend in parson
along with proof of identity or an affidavit to that effect. The existing rules
regarding service of summons and the consequences for non-attendance, as
provided in the CPC and Cr.P.C. shall apply with respect to service of summons
for proceedings conducted by video conferencing.
7.2 If a person is examined with reference to a
particular document then the summons to Witness must be accompanied by a duly
certified photocopy of the document. The original document should be exhibited
at the Court Point In accordance with the deposition of the concerned person
being examined.
Rule - 8. Examination of persons.
8.1 Any person being examined, including a
wittiness, shall, before being examined through video conferencing, produce and
file proof of identity by submitting an identity document issued or duly
recognized by the Government of India, State Government, Union Territory, or in
the absence of such a document, an affidavit attested by any of the authorities
referred to in Section 139 of the CPC or Section 297 of the Cr.P.C., as the
case maybe. The affidavit will Inter alia state that the person, who is shown
to be the party to the proceedings or as a witness, is the same person, who is
to depose at the video conferencing. A copy of the proof of identity or
affidavit, as the case may be, will be made available to the opposite party.
8.2 The person being examined will ordinarily be
examined during the working hours of the concerned Court or at such time as the
Court may deem fit.
8.3 Where an accused is to be examined through
video conferencing. The Court shall provide him adequate opportunity to consult
in privacy with their counsel before, during and after the video conferencing.
8.4 The Court shall obtain the signature of the
person being examined on the transcript once the examination is concluded. The
signed transcript will form part of the record of the judicial proceedings. The
signature on the transcript of the person being examined shall be obtained in
either of the following ways:
8.4.1 If digital
signatures are available at both the concerned Court Point and Remote Point,
the soft copy of the transcript digitally signed by the presiding Judge at the
Court Point shall be sent by the official e-mail to the Remote Point where a
print out of the same will be taken and signed by the person examined. A scanned
copy of the transcript digitally signed by the Coordinator at the Remote Point
would be transmitted by official email of the Court Point. The hard copy of the
signed transcript will be dispatched, preferably within three days by the
Coordinator at the Remote Point to the Court Point by recognised courier
registered speed post.
8.4.2 if digital
signatures are not available, the printout of the transcript shall be signed by
the presiding Judge and the representative of the parties, if any, at the Court
Point and shall be sent in non-editable scanned format to the official email
account of the Remote Point, where a printout of the same will be taken and
signed by the person, examined and countersigned by the Coordinator at the
Remote Point: A non-editable scanned format of the transcript so signed shall
be sent by the Coordinator of the Remote Point to the official email account of
the Court Point, where a print out of the same will be taken and shall be made
a part of the judicial record. The hard copy would also be dispatched
preferably within three days by the Coordinator at the Remote Point to the
Court Point by recognised courier/registered speed post.
8.5 An audio-visual recording of the examination
of person examined shall be preserved. An encrypted master copy with hash value
and its algorithm/software shall be retained as a part of the record.
8.6 The Court may, at the request of a person to
be examined, or on its own motion, taking into account the best interests of
the person to be examined, direct appropriate measures to protect the privacy
of the person examined bearing in mind aspects such as age, gender, physical
condition and recognized customs and practices.
8.7 The Coordinator at the Remote Point shall
ensure that no person is present at the Remote Point, save and except the
person being examined and those whose presence is deamed administratively
necessary by the Coordinator for the proceedings to continue.
8.8 The Court may also impose such other
conditions as are necessary in a given set of facts for effective recording of
the examination (especially to ensure compliance with Rule 5.6.4).
8.9 Where a Required Person is not capable of
reaching the Court Point or the Remote Point due to sickness or physical
infirmity, or presence of the required person cannot be secured without undue
delay or expense, the Court may authorize the conduct of video conferencing
from the place at which such person is located. In such circumstances the Court
may direct the use of portable video conferencing systems. Authority in this
behalf may be given to the concerned Coordinator and/or any person deemed fit
by the Court.
8.10 Subject to such orders as the Court may pass,
in case any party or parson authorized by the party is desirous of being
physically present at the Remote Point at the time of recording of the
testimony, such a party shall make its own arrangement for
appearance/representation at the Remote Point.
Rule - 9. Exhibiting or Showing Document to Witness or Accused at a Remote Point.
If in the course of examination of a person at a
Remote Point by video conferencing, it is necessary to show a document to the
person, the Court may permit the document to be shown in the following manner:
9.1 If the document is at the Court Point, by
transmitting a copy or image of the document to the Remote Point
electronically, including through a document visualizer, or
9.2 If the document is at the Remote Point by
putting it to the person and transmitting a copy image of the same to the Court
Point electronically including through a document visualizer. The hard copy of
the document counter signed by the witness and the Coordinator at the Remote
Point shall be dispatched thereafter to the Court Point via authorized
courier/registered speed post.
Rule - 10. Ensuring seamless video conferencing.
10.1 The Advocate or Required Person, shall address
the Court by video, conferencing from a specified Remote Point on the date and
time specified in the order issued by the Court. The presence of the
coordinator will not be necessary at the Remote point where arguments are to be
addressed by an advocate or party in person before the Court.
10.2 If the proceedings are carried out from any of
the Remote Point(s) (in situations described in Rules 5.3.1 to 5.3.9) the
Coordinator at such Remote Point shall ensure compliance of all technical
requirements. However, if the proceedings are conducted from Remote Paint
failing in the situation contemplated under Rule 5.3.10 such as an Advocate's
office, the Coordinator at the Court Point shall ensure compliance of al
technical requirements for conducting video conferencing at both the Court
Point and the Remote Point.
10.3 The Coordinator at the Court Point shall be in
contact with the concerned Advocate or the Required Person and guide them in
regard to the fulfilment of technical and other requirements for executing a
successful hearing through video conferencing. Any problems faced by such
Remote Users shall be resolved by the Court Point Coordinator. The Court Point
Coordinator shall inter alia share the link of the video conferencing hearing
with such Remote Users.
10.4 The Coordinator at the Court Point shall ensure
that any document or audio-visual files, emailed by the Remote User, are duly
received at the Court Point.
10.5 The Coordinator at the Court Point shall also
conduct a trial video conferencing, preferably 30 minutes prior to scheduled
video conferencing in order to ensure that all the technical systems are in
working condition at both the Court Point and, the Remote Point.
10.6 At the scheduled time, the Coordinator at the
Court Point shall connect the Remote User to the Court.
10.7 On completion of the video conferencing
proceeding, the Court shall mention in the order sheet the time and duration of
the proceeding, the software used (in case the software used is not the
Designated Video Conferencing Software), the issue(s) on which the Court was
addressed and the documents if any that were produced and transmitted online.
In case a digital recording's tendered, the Court shall record its duration in
the order sheet along with all other requisite details.
10.8 The Court shall also record its satisfaction as
to clarity, sound and connectivity for both Court Users and Remote Users.
10.9 On the completion of video conferencing. If a
Remote User is of the opinion that they were, prejudiced due to poor video
and/or audio quality, the Remote User shall immediately inform the Coordinator
at the Court Point, who shall, in turn, communicate this information to the
Court without any delay. The Court shall consider the grievance and if it finds
substance in the grievance may declare the hearing to be incomplete and the
parties may be asked to re-connect or make a physical appearance in Court.
Rule - 11. Judicial remand, framing of charge, examination of accused and proceedings under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C.
11.1 The Court may, at its discretion, authorize
detention of an accuse frame charges in a criminal trial by video conferencing.
However, ordinarily judicial remand in the first instance or police remand
shall not be granted through video conferencing save and except in exceptional
circumstances for reasons to be recorded in writing.
11.2 The Court may in exceptional circumstance for
reasons to be, recorded in writing examine a witness or an accused under
Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. or record the statement of the accused under Section
313 Cr.P.C.. through video conferencing, while observing all due precautions to
ensure that the witness or the accused as the case may be is free of any form
of coercion, threat or undue influence.
CHAPTER IV
GENERAL PROCEDURE
Rule - 12. General procedure.
12.1 The procedure set out hereafter in this chapter
is without prejudice to the procedure indicated elsewhere in these Rules qua
specific instances in which proceedings are conducted via video conferencing.
12.2 The Coordinator at the Court Point shall ensure
that video conferencing is conducted only through a Designated Video
Conferencing Software. However, in the event of a technical glitch during a
given proceeding the concerned Court may for reasons to be recorded permit the
use of a software other than the Designated Video Conferencing Software for
video conferencing in that particular proceeding.
12.3 The identity of the person to be examined shall
be confirmed by the Court with the assistance of the Coordinator at the Remote
Point in accordance with Rule 8.1, at the time of recording of the evidence and
the same must be reflected in the order sheet of the Court.
12.4 In civil cases, parties requesting for
recording statements of the person to be examined by video conferencing shall
confirm to the Court, the location of the person, the willingness of such
person to be examined through video conferencing and the availability of
technical facilities for video conferencing at the agreed upon time and place.
12.5 In criminal cases, where the person to be
examined is a prosecution witness or a Court witness, or where a person to be
examined is a defence witness, the counsel for the prosecution or defence
counsel, as the case maybe, shall confirm to the Court the location of the
person, willingness to be examined by video conferencing and the time, place
and technical facility for such video conferencing.
12.6 In case the person to be examined is an
accused, the prosecution will confirm the location of the accused at the Remote
Point.
12.7 If the accused is in custody and not present at
the Court Point, the Court will order a multi-point video conference between
itself, the witness and the accused in custody to facilitate recording of the
statement of the witness (including medical or other expert). The Court shall
ensure that the defence of the accused is not prejudiced in any manner and that
the safeguards contained in Rule 8.3 are observed.
12.8 The Coordination at the Remote Point shall be
paid such amount as honorarium as may be directed by the Court in consultation
with the parties.
Rule - 13. Costs of Video Conferencing.
In the absence of rules prescribed by the concerned
Court, the Court may take into consideration following circumstances when
determining and/or apportioning the costs of video conferencing:
13.1 In criminal cases, the expenses of the video
conferencing facility including expenses involved in preparing soft
Copies/certified copies of the Court record and transmitting the same to the
Coordinator at the Remote Point and the fee payable to
translator/interpreter/special educator, as the case may be, as also the fee
payable to the Coordinator at the Remote Point, shall be borne by such party as
directed by the Court.
13.2 In civil cases, generally, the party making the
request for recording evidence, through video conferencing shall bear the
expenses.
13.3 Besides the above, the Court may also make an
order as to expenses as it considers appropriate, taking into account
rules/instructions regarding payment of expenses to the complainant and
witnesses, as any be prevalent from time to time.
13.4 It shall be open to the Court to waive the
costs as warranted in a given situation.
Rule - 14. Conduct of Proceedings.
14.1 Before the commencement of video conferencing
all participants, shall have their presence recorded. However, in case a
participant is desirous that their face or, name be masked, information to that
effect will be furnished to the Court Point Coordinator prior to the
commencement of the proceeding.
14.2 The Court Point Coordinator shall send the
link/Meeting ID/Room Details via the email Id/mobile number furnished by the
Advocate or required Person or other participant permitted to be virtually
present by the Court Once the proceedings have commenced, no other persons will
be permitted to participate in the virtual hearing, save and except with the
permission of the Court.
14.3 The participants, after joining the hearing
shall remain in the virtual lobby if available, until they are admitted to
virtual hearing by the Coordinator at the Court Point.
14.4 Participation in the proceedings shall
constitute consent by the participants to the proceedings being recorded by
video conferencing.
14.5 Establishment and disconnection of links
between the Court Point and the Remote Point would be regulated by orders of
the Court.
14.6 The Court shall satisfy itself that the
Advocate, Required Person or any other participant that the Court deems
necessary at the Remote Point or the Court Point can be seen and heard clearly
and can clearly see and hear the Court. ,
14.7 To ensure that video conferencing is conducted
seamlessly, the difficulties, if any, experienced in connectivity must be
brought to the notice of the Court at the earliest on the official email
address and mobile number of the Court Point Coordinator which has been
furnished to the participant before the commencement of the virtual hearing. No
complaint shall subsequently be entertained.
14.8 Wherever any proceeding is carried out by the
Court under these Rules by taking recourse to video conferencing, this shall
specifically be mentioned in the order sheet.
Rule - 15. Access to Legal Aid Clinics/Camps/Lok Adalats/Jail Adalats.
In conformity with the provisions of the Legal
Services Authorities Act, 1987 and the laws in force, proceedings related to
Legal Aid Clinics, Camps, Lok Adalats or Jail Adalats, may also be conducted by
way of Video Conferencing.
Rule - 16. Allowing persons who are not parties to the case to view the proceedings.
In order to observe the requirement of an open
Court proceeding, members of the public will be allowed to view Court hearings
conducted through video conferencing, except proceedings conducted in-camera.
The Court shall endeavour to make available sufficient links (consistent with
available bandwidth) for accessing the proceedings.
CHAPTER V
MISCELLANEOUS
Rule - 17. Reference to Words and Expressions.
Words and expressions used and not defined in these
Rules shall have the same meaning as assigned to them in the CPC, the Cr.P.C.,
Evidence Act, IT Act, and the General Clauses Act, 1897.
Rule - 18. Power to Relax.
The High Court may if satisfied that the operation
of any Rule is causing undue hardship, by an order dispense with or relax the
requirements of that Rule to such extent and subject to such condition, as may
be stipulated to deal with the case in a just and equitable manner.
Rule - 19. Residual Provisions.
Matters, with respect to which no express provision
has been made in these Rules shall be decided by the Court consistent with the
interests of justice. This amendment will come into force with immediate
effect.
SCHEDULE
I
Request Form for Video Conference
(1) Case Number/CNR Number (if any)
(2) Cause Title
(3) Proposed Date of conference
(DD/MM/YYYY):......................
(4) Location of the Court
Point(s):.............................
(5) Location of the Remote
Point(s):.............................
(6) Names & Designation of the
Participants at the Remote Point:.......................
(7) Reasons for Video Conferencing:
In the matter of:
(8) Nature of Proceedings: Final
Hearing [] Motion Hearing [] Others []
I have read and understood the provisions of High
Court of Uttarakhand Video Conferencing Rules, 2020. I undertake to remain
bound by the same to the extent applicable to me. I agree to pay video
conferencing charges if so directed by the Court. Signature of the applicant/authorised signatory: Date: |
???????????????????????????.
For use of the Registry/Court Point Coordinator
(A) Bench assigned: (B) Hearing: Held on (DD/MM/YYYY): Commencement Time: End time: Number of hours: (C) Costs: Overseas transmission charges if any: To be Incurred by Applicant/Respondent: To be shared equally: Waived; as ordered by the Court: Signature of the authorised officer: Date: |
Sd/
Registrar General
By Order of Hon'ble the Court,
Sd/-
Registrar General.
[1] Ed.: Section 26 of the Uttar
Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 names the High Court for the State of
Uttarakhand as the "High Court of Uttaranchal". Section 26 remains
unamended by Parliament. Wherefore, can the name of the High Court be changed
without amending Section 26?