Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Vijay Kumar v. Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Others

Vijay Kumar v. Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Others

(High Court Of Himachal Pradesh)

CWP No.3898 of 2021 | 29-07-2021

Ravi Malimath, J.

1. The prayer of the petitioner is to the effect that the respondent-Corporation be ordered to regularize his services w.e.f. 17.01.2018 with all consequential benefits.

2. The plea of the petitioner is that the said issue is covered by the judgment of this Court passed in CWP No.2110 of 2019, titled Rajinder Kumar Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & another, decided on 22.10.2019 (Annexure P-2). Therefore, the limited prayer of the petitioner is that the respondents be directed to consider his request, based on the aforesaid judgment of this Court.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that the prayer of the petitioner will be considered in the light of the aforesaid judgment, subject to any appeal or otherwise that may be filed.

4. In view of the submissions made, the petition is disposed off. The respondents are directed to consider the request of the petitioner, in terms of the aforesaid judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.2110 of 2019, in accordance with law.

Advocate List
  • Mr. H.R. Bhardwaj

  • Mr. Virbahadur Verma

Bench
  • Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath
  • Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Eq Citations
  • LQ
  • LQ/HimHC/2021/1508
Head Note

Service Law — Regularization — Prayer for regularization of services of petitioner — Held, respondents to consider request of petitioner in terms of aforesaid judgment passed by Supreme Court in CWP No.2110 of 2019, in accordance with law (Paras 2 to 4)