Open iDraf
Union Of India And Others v. Raj Rani And Others

Union Of India And Others
v.
Raj Rani And Others

(Supreme Court Of India)

Civil Appeals Nos. ... of 1996 (Arising out of SLPs (C) Nos. 2382-84 of 1994 | 21-03-1996


1. Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel on both sides

3. The only question is whether the respondents are entitled to the payment of solatium and interest under the provisions of the Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952. The controversy is no longer res integra. A three-Judge Bench of this Court in Union of India v. Hari Krishan Khosla had considered the entire controversy and had held that the respondents were not entitled to the payment of interest and solatium. The learned counsel for the respondents sought to place reliance upon a two-Judge Bench decision in Rao Narain Singh v. Union of India. In view of the decision in Hari Krishan Khosla case the ratio of Rao Narain Singh case is no longer good law

4. The appeals are accordingly allowed. No costs.

Advocates List

For

For Petitioner
  • Shekhar Naphade
  • Mahesh Agrawal
  • Tarun Dua
For Respondent
  • S. Vani
  • B. Sunita Rao
  • Sushil Kumar Pathak

Bench List

HON'BLE JUSTICE G. T. NANAVATI

HON'BLE JUSTICE K. RAMASWAMY

Eq Citation

(1998) 8 SCC 704

LQ/SC/1996/654

HeadNote

Land Acquisition and Requisition Act, 1952 — S. 31-A