Open iDraf
Ummilal v. State Of Madhya Pradesh

Ummilal
v.
State Of Madhya Pradesh

(Supreme Court Of India)

Criminal Appeal No. 238 Of 1979 | 12-03-1981


1. The appellant Ummilal was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Seoni, Madhya Pradesh, under Section 302 of the Penal Code on the charge that at about 12 noon on October 20, 1977, he committed the murder of his brothers wife, Faggobai and her 9 year old son Suresh Kumar. The sentence of death imposed upon the appellant for the aforesaid offence was confirmed by the High Court and hence this appeal by special leave

2. There is clear and incontrovertible evidence to prove the charge that the appellant committed the murder of Faggobai and Suresh Kumar. Khilai, P.W. 4 and Ballu, P.W. 14 as also the dying declaration Exh. P-17 of the deceased Faggobai, which was recorded by Dr. Jain, P.W. 15, leave no manner of doubt on that aspect of the matter. Shri T. U. Mehta who appears on behalf of the appellant has not been able successfully to persuade us to take a view contrary to that taken by the trial court and the High Court on the merits of the conviction

3. The only question which survives for consideration is as to whether the sentence of death must be confirmed. Having given our best consideration to this matter we find ourselves unable to agree that the death sentence is called for. It is the case of the prosecution itself that at about 11 Oclock on the morning of October 20, 1977 there was a quarrel between the appellant and his brother Hari Prasad, the husband of the deceased Faggobai, during the course of which the appellant was slapped by his brother. The quarrel appears to have taken place over the grazing of cattle by Hari Prasad. Then appellant seems to have been incensed by the treatment accorded to him by his brother as a result of which he went home straight and committed the dastardly attack on Hari prasads wife and son. The appellant was just about 22 years of age and appears to have acted under a sudden impulse in a grave fit of rage. In these circumstances we are of the opinion that the ends of justice will be met by sentencing the appellant to imprisonment for life

4. Accordingly we confirm the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Penal Code but set aside the sentence of death imoosed upon him and sentence him to imorisonment for life.

5. Order accordingly.

Advocates List

For

For Petitioner
  • Shekhar Naphade
  • Mahesh Agrawal
  • Tarun Dua
For Respondent
  • S. Vani
  • B. Sunita Rao
  • Sushil Kumar Pathak

Bench List

HON'BLE JUSTICE A. P. SEN

HON'BLE JUSTICE V. B. ERADI

Eq Citation

1981 CRILJ 1446

(1981) 3 SCC 574

(1981) SCC CRI 760

AIR 1981 SC 1710

LQ/SC/1981/155

HeadNote

- Appellant convicted of murder under S. 302 IPC, death sentence confirmed by High Court, appeal filed. - Prosecution evidence, including dying declaration and eyewitness accounts, establishes appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. - Death sentence not warranted in this case, considering appellant's age (22 years), sudden impulse, and grave fit of rage caused by a quarrel with his brother. - Conviction under S. 302 IPC upheld, but death sentence set aside. - Appellant sentenced to life imprisonment.