Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Umesh Kumar Arora & Anr v. The State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr

Umesh Kumar Arora & Anr v. The State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr

(High Court Of Delhi)

Criminal Miscellaneous (Main) No. 2909/2019 | 28-05-2019

Crl. M.A.11736-37/2019 (Exemption)

1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. Applications are disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 2909/2019 & Crl. M.A.11735/2019

1. Quashing of FIR No.203/2016, under Sections 498- A/406/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Kirti Nagar, Delhi, is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 16th March, 2019 (Annexure-P-3) and affidavit of respondent No.2 of 23rd May, 2019.

2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Suresh Chand, on the basis of identity proof produced by her.

3. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved as per Mediated Settlement dated 16th March, 2019 and that now no dispute with petitioners survives and so, the proceedings arising out of the FIR in question be brought to an end.

4. Supreme Court in Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC 641 [LQ/SC/2017/1450] has reiterated the parameters for exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR/criminal proceedings, which are as under:-

“16.7. As distinguished from serious offences, there may be criminal cases which have an overwhelming or predominant element of a civil dispute. They stand on a distinct footing insofar as the exercise of the inherent power to quash is concerned.

16.8. Criminal cases involving offences which arise from commercial, financial, mercantile, partnership or similar transactions with an essentially civil flavour may in appropriate situations fall for quashing where parties have settled the dispute.

16.9. In such a case, the High Court may quash the criminal proceeding if in view of the compromise between the disputants, the possibility of a conviction is remote and the continuation of a criminal proceeding would cause oppression and prejudice.”

5. Since the subject matter of this FIR is essentially matrimonial, which now stands mutually and amicably settled between parties, therefore, continuance of proceedings arising out of the FIR in question would be an exercise in futility.

6. Accordingly, this petition is allowed subject to costs of ₹10,000/- to be deposited by petitioner with Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund within two weeks from today. Upon placing on record the proof of deposit of costs within a week thereafter and handing over its copy to the Investigating Officer, FIR No.203/2016, under Sections 498- A/406/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Kirti Nagar, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom shall stand quashed qua petitioners.

7. This petition and application are accordingly disposed of.

8. Dasti.

Advocate List
  • Petitioners Through: Mr.Gaurav Gupta and Mr.Jaspal Singh, Advocates.

  • Respondents Through: Ms.Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Suresh Chand.

  • Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person.

Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
Eq Citations
  • LQ/DelHC/2019/2693
Head Note

Constitution of India — Arts. 226 and 136 — Quashal of FIR — Conditional quashing of FIR on basis of settlement — Power of Supreme Court/High Court under S. 482 CrPC — Parameters for exercise of inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR/criminal proceedings — When FIR is essentially matrimonial in nature and has been mutually and amicably settled between parties — Quashal of FIR — Penal Code, 1860, Ss. 498-A, 406 and 34