Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Sunil Kumar Thapa And Another v. State Of Meghalaya

Sunil Kumar Thapa And Another v. State Of Meghalaya

(High Court Of Meghalaya)

Crl. Petn. No. 7 of 2019 | 08-04-2019

1. Petitioners are married to each other, they had developed some hostility which gave rise to lodging of an FIR by the petitioner No. 2 against her husband petitioner No. 1 registered as Rynjah P.S. Case No. 130 (8) 14 under Section 498 A/447/426/509/34 IPC. On completion of the investigation, charge sheet No. 3/2015 was filed against a number of accused but others were discharged whereas, petition No. 1 had to face the trial. Now by the instant petition, quashing of the proceedings of G.R. Case No. 476(A) 2014 pending in the court of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Shillong, is sought. Copy of the Deed of Compromise has been placed on records wherein, petitioners have resolved the controversies with the intervention of the well-wishers, friends and family members.

2. Learned counsel while relying on the judgment rendered by the Honble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another: (2012)10 SCC 303 [LQ/SC/1999/116] prays that the instant case is fit for acceptance of the compromise. Inherent power under Section 482 can be exercised even in non-compoundable cases where the parties have settled their difference with a word of caution that inherent power has to be exercised after having regard to nature and gravity of the crime and its societal impact. In the case of the petitioners herein, the commission of alleged offence is not that heinous, it happens that the husband and the wife fight and loss faith in each other.

3. Be that as it may, by exercising the jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC in the instant case, the relationship between the husband and wife i.e., petitioners will remain undisturbed, hostility will get mitigated, same will help to allow the petitioners to live a peaceful married life. It is in the same background, learned AG has not opposed to the submissions as made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

4. While considering the whole gamut of the matter and keeping in view the relationship of the petitioners as husband and wife and the length of matrimonial relationship, the exercise of inherent jurisdiction will definitely advance the cause of justice, therefore, petition is allowed. The proceedings of the criminal case i.e., G.R. Case No. 476(A) 2014 pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Shillong shall stand quashed. The learned Magistrate shall accordingly close the proceedings.

5. Copy of this order be sent to the learned trial court for information.

6. Disposed of as above.

Advocate List
  • For Petitioner : Mr. R. Gurung, Advocate, For the Petitioner; Mr. A. Kumar, AG with Ms. S. G. Momin, Sr. GA, For the Respondent
Bench
  • HON'BLE JUSTICE MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR, C.J.
Eq Citations
  • LQ/MegHC/2019/96
Head Note

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 498 A/447/426/509/34 — Suppression of evidence — FIR lodged by wife against husband — Petitioner husband seeking quashing of FIR on basis of compromise between parties — FIR under S. 498-A, being non-compoundable, held, can be quashed under inherent power of court — Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S. 482