Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Stellar Investments Limited v. Kusum Infrastructures Private Limited

Stellar Investments Limited v. Kusum Infrastructures Private Limited

(National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi)

(IB)-162(PB)/2023 | 27-03-2023

1. This is a petition filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016. It is stated by the petitioner that notice in terms of Rule 4 of Adjudicating Authority, IBC Rules, 2016 has already been issued on the Corporate Debtor.

2. In view of the Judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors., reported in (2019) 4 SCC 17, Paragraph 58 reads as follows:

"...A conjoint reading of all these Rules makes it clear that at the stage of the Adjudicating Authority's satisfaction under Section 7(5) of the Code, the corporate debtor is served with a copy of the application filed with the Adjudicating Authority and has the opportunity to file a reply before the said authority and be heard by the said authority before an order is made admitting the said application."

3. And in the matter of M/s. Surendra Trading Company Vs. M/s. Juggilala Kamlapat Jute mills Company and Ors. Reported in, Paragraph 24 reads as follows:

"Further, we are of the view that the judgments cited by the NCLAT and the principle contained therein applied while deciding that period of fourteen days within which the adjudicating authority has to pass the order is not mandatory but the directory in nature would equally apply while interpreting proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 7, Section 9 or sub-section (4) of Section 10 as well. After all, the applicant does not gain anything by not removing the objections in as much as till the objections are removed, such an application would not be entertained. Therefore, it is in the interest of the applicant to remove the defects as early as possible."

4. And in the Judgment passed by the Hon'ble NCLA in the matter of Innovative Industries Vs. ICICI Bank reported in 2018 1 SCC 407, Paragraph 64 reads as follows:

"The different decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, as referred to above and the exception of principles of natural justice as noticed and summarised in the preceding paragraphs is not applicable to the insolvency resolution process as it is not a case of emergency declared or prejudicial to the public interest or that there is a statutory exclusion of rules of natural justice or it is impracticable to hold the hearing. It is not the case that no right of any person has been affected, as immediately on appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional, the Board of directors stand superseded. Other persons are also affected due to the order of moratorium. Therefore, the 'adjudicating authority' is duty bound to give notice to the corporate debtor before admission of a petition under Section 7 or Section 9."

5. Accordingly, notice to the Respondent/Corporate Debtor, be issued, returnable by seven days.

6. This Notice to be sent by the Petitioner/Financial Creditor under NCLT Rules, Form-5.

1. By way of an email to the registered email of the Corporate Debtor available with the petitioner.

2. By way of an email to the CD email address registered with the MCA.

3. Service by way of Dasti within three days for today.

4. Proof of Service in any one of the above forms filed by way of an affidavit before the next date of hearing.

7. List the matter for further consideration on 10.04.2023.

8. Ld. Counsels for the parties are directed to file the hard copies of the pleadings.

Advocate List
  • Mohd Nazim Khan Adv.

Bench
  • RAMALINGAM SUDHAKAR&nbsp
  • PRESIDENT
  • AVINASH K. SRIVASTAVA&nbsp
  • MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Eq Citations
  • LQ
  • LQ/NCLT/2023/1503
Head Note

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — S. 7(5) — Petition under — Adjudicating Authority's satisfaction under S. 7(5) — Corporate debtor to be served with a copy of application filed with Adjudicating Authority and has opportunity to file a reply before said authority and be heard by said authority before an order is made admitting said application — IBC Rules, 2016, R. 4 (Paras 2 and 5 to 8)