State Of West Bengal v. Reena Joshi & Anr

State Of West Bengal v. Reena Joshi & Anr

(High Court Of Delhi)

W.P.(C) 9190/2021 | 27-08-2021

CM No. 28619-20/2021

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions

W.P.(C) 9190/2021 & CM No.28618/2021 [Application filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking stay on the operation of the impugned order, dated 22.07.2021]

2. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 22.07.2021, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (in short “the Tribunal”) in OA No.885/2021.

2.1. The operative directions are contained in paragraph 8 of the impugned order of the Tribunal. For the sake of convenience, the same is extracted hereunder: -

"8. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, we allow the OA and set aside the order dated 30.11.2016. We grant time of six weeks to the State of West Bengal to pass necessary orders in this behalf. It is directed that in case the applicant is not relieved by that time, she shall be deemed to have been relieved on expiry of six weeks”.

3. The record shows that, respondent no.1 had sought inter-cadre transfer, as far back as on 05.04.2016.

3.1. The inter-cadre transfer was sought on account of the fact that, her spouse, who is an Indian Forest Service (IFS) officer of 2012 batch, was posted in Uttarakhand cadre

3.2. The request of respondent no. 1 was rejected by the petitioner i.e., the State of West Bengal, on 30.11.2016, on account of shortage of officers.

4. There is no dispute that, respondent no.1 was entitled to seek intercadre transfer, in terms of Rule 5(2) of the Indian Administrative Services (Cadre) Rules, 1954.

5. The tribunal, after considering the stand taken by the petitioner, has taken the view, as indicated above, that the petitioner needs to pass a fresh order.

6. Having examined the record and heard the counsel for the parties, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order.

7. We may note that, the petitioner has trotted out, shortage of officers, as the reason, for rejecting the request of respondent no.1 qua inter-cadre transfer, without placing the relevant material on record

7.1. We are noticing that, this approach has been taken, in matter after matter, by the petitioner where officer(s) have sought inter-cadre transfer to other State(s) on account of their marriage, and which has been refused on a similar ground.

7.2. Unless the reasons set out in the order of refusal for inter-cadre transfer are backed by relevant material, it cannot pass muster of this Court.

7.3. In any event, the tribunal has given another opportunity to the petitioner to pass a fresh order, as indicated above.

8. Therefore, we find no merit in the writ petition, at least, at this juncture

9. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application shall also stand closed.

Advocate List
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
Eq Citations
  • LQ/DelHC/2021/2262
Head Note

Service Law — Cadre Rules — Indian Administrative Services (Cadre) Rules, 1954 — R. 5(2) — Inter-cadre transfer — Reasons for rejection — Need to be backed by relevant material — Refusal of inter-cadre transfer on ground of shortage of officers without placing relevant material on record, held, not sustainable — Tribunal rightly directed petitioner to pass a fresh order (Paras 7 to 7.3)