State Of U. P
v.
Angoori Devi
(Supreme Court Of India)
Civil Appeal No. 368 Of 1985 With No. 2493, 1294-95 Of 1985 And 15695 Of 1996 | 19-03-1997
Having read the decisions reported in State of U.P. v. L.J.
Johnson (two-Judge Bench) and the decision reported in Meera Gupta v. State of W.B.and the referring order in Angoori Devi v. State of U.P. we think that there are certain areas in these judgments which would require consideration and it would, therefore, be proper if the matters are placed before a larger Bench of 5 Honble Judges so that it is resolved once for all.
Johnson (two-Judge Bench) and the decision reported in Meera Gupta v. State of W.B.and the referring order in Angoori Devi v. State of U.P. we think that there are certain areas in these judgments which would require consideration and it would, therefore, be proper if the matters are placed before a larger Bench of 5 Honble Judges so that it is resolved once for all.
Advocates List
For
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE JUSTICE A. M. AHMADI (CJI)
HON'BLE JUSTICE K. S. PARIPOORNAN
HON'BLE JUSTICE S. P. KURDUKAR
Eq Citation
(1997) 7 SCC 757
LQ/SC/1997/518
HeadNote
Constitution of India — Arts. 136 and 142 — Reference to larger Bench — Necessity for — Held, there are certain areas in the decisions of two-Judge Benches which would require consideration and it would, therefore, be proper if the matters are placed before a larger Bench of 5 Hon'ble Judges so that it is resolved once for all
Thank you for subscribing! Please check your inbox to opt-in.
Oh no, error happened! Please check the email address and/or try again.