Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

St. Antony's Educational And Charitable Society v. Union Of India (uoi)

St. Antony's Educational And Charitable Society v. Union Of India (uoi)

(High Court Of Kerala)

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 28334 Of 2004 | 31-08-2005

C.N. Ramachandran Nair, J.

1. Petitioner, a charitable society is running parallel college for coaching private students for writing various University examinations as well as computer courses for training students for "A" level and "O" level examinations conducted by the DOEACC society an organisation under the control of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Government of India. The challenge is against the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 authorising levy of service tax on the services rendered by "commercial training and coaching centres." Ext. P3 notice issued by the third respondent demanding registration and service tax is also under challenge. In the first place, being a parallel college petitioner is entitled to the benefit of the judgment in W.P.C. No. 728 of 2004 and connected cases disposed of today holding that no service tax can be demanded from parallel colleges as the demand is discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. Petitioner has produced Exts. P4 and P5 certificates issued by the DOEACC society under the Control of Govt. of India, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, granting accreditation to it to conduct computer courses for coaching students to write for "A" level and "O" level certificate examinations which are conducted by DOEACC society. In the judgment in W.P.C. No. 728 of 2004 and connected cases referred to above. It was held that an educational institution conducting any course which is a requirement to write examination to obtain degree or certificate awarded by any agency created by law, is entitled to exemption under the definition Clause 65(27) of the Finance Act, 1994. Therefore, petitioner is not liable to pay any service tax, W.P.C. is accordingly allowed quashing Ext. P3 notice issued against the petitioner.

Advocate List
  • For Petitioner : P.C. Joseph Pazheparambil, Adv.
  • For Respondent : John Varghese, SCGSC
Bench
  • HON'BLE JUSTICE C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
Eq Citations
  • 2006 [1] S.T.R. 137 (KER)
  • (2006) 202 CTR (KER) 229
  • LQ/KerHC/2005/627
Head Note

Education and Allied Laws — Finance Act, 1994 — S. 65(27) — Service tax — Educational institution conducting any course which is a requirement to write examination to obtain degree or certificate awarded by any agency created by law, entitled to exemption under — Petitioner, a charitable society running parallel college for coaching private students for writing various University examinations as well as computer courses for training students for "A" level and "O" level examinations conducted by DOEACC society, an organisation under the control of Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Government of India, held, entitled to exemption — Ext. P3 notice issued by 3rd respondent demanding registration and service tax, quashed — Finance Act, 1994 — S. 65(27)