Smt. Ana Carelina D'souza
v.
Union Of India And Others
(Supreme Court Of India)
Writ Petition No. 821 And 822 Of 1981 | 07-04-1981
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.
1. In both these petitions it is admitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that the documents upon which grounds of detention are based were not supplied to the detenus along with the grounds of detention. In view of the long line of decisions of this court, we have no option but to direct the detenus to be set at liberty forthwith. It is so ordered
2. Order accordingly.
1. In both these petitions it is admitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that the documents upon which grounds of detention are based were not supplied to the detenus along with the grounds of detention. In view of the long line of decisions of this court, we have no option but to direct the detenus to be set at liberty forthwith. It is so ordered
2. Order accordingly.
Advocates List
For
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE JUSTICE A. P. SEN
HON'BLE JUSTICE BAHARUL ISLAM
HON'BLE JUSTICE O. CHINNAPPA REDDY
Eq Citation
1981 CRILJ 1277
(1981) SUPPL. SCC 53
AIR 1981 SC 1620
(1982) SCC CRI 131
LQ/SC/1981/210
HeadNote
Constitution of India — Art. 22(5) — Deprivation of liberty — Grounds of detention — Non-supply of documents on which grounds of detention are based — Detenue set at liberty — Held, in view of long line of decisions of Supreme Court, no option but to direct detenu to be set at liberty forthwith
Thank you for subscribing! Please check your inbox to opt-in.
Oh no, error happened! Please check the email address and/or try again.