Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Shafhi Mohammad v. State Of Himachal Pradesh

Shafhi Mohammad v. State Of Himachal Pradesh

(Supreme Court Of India)

Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Nos. 2302 of 2017 | 12-10-2017

Adarsh Kumar Goel

1. Heard. Use of videography for crime investigation is the issue taken up for consideration as per the order dated 25th April, 2017.

2. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, learned Additional Solicitor General, has filed a note stating that the matter was discussed by the Union Home Secretary with the Chief Secretaries of the States. A decision was taken to constitute a Committee of Experts (COE) to facilitate and prepare a report to formulate a road-map for use of videography in crime investigation and to propose a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The Committee has held its meetings. The response of the States is in support of use of videography. The Central Investigation Agencies have also supported the said concept. However, certain reservations have been expressed in the implementation such as funding, securing the data and storage of the same. It has also been submitted that the production and admissibility of evidence are also issues which may need to be addressed.

3. We had requested Mr. Jayant Bhushan, learned senior counsel, to assist the court who has also submitted a note to the effect that videography will be a beneficial step for effective prosecution subject to the issue of admissibility being resolved to make the use of videography compatible and useful. He also submitted that the direction ought to be issued for use of videography in investigation and such use be made mandatory.

4. We have also requested Mr. Arun Mohan, learned senior counsel, present in the Court, to assist the Court on the subject as amicus. He submitted that equipments which may be useful for scientific investigation have been suggested in certain publications on the subject. A copy each of the said publications has been furnished to Mr. Nadkarni so that the same can be considered by the Committee of Experts. He submitted that still photography may be more useful as it enables much higher resolution for forensic analysis. Digital camera can be placed on a mount on a tripod which may enable rotation and tilting. Secured portals may be established to which Investigation Officer can e-mail photographs taken at the crime scene. To give authenticity and prevent manipulation, digital images can be retained on State's server as permanent record. The State server can re-mail the digital files back to the police station for further use. Special cameras may be selected by the BPR&D. Till this is done, smart-phones can also be used. BPR&D may prepare a guidance manual for the Investigation Officers for crime scene photography and video recording of statements of witnesses. He stated that a further note on the subject may be submitted by him.

5. Mr. Nadkarni submitted that the Committee of Experts is examining the matter and is likely to submit a report by the 2nd week of November, 2017.

6. We are of the view that any further direction on the subject ought to be given by this Court after considering the said report.

7. List the matter for further consideration on 23rd November, 2017, as prayed.

Advocate List
  • Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Senior Advocate. (A.C.), Mr. Ketan Paul, Mr. Chirayu Jain, Mr. Arun Mohan, Senior Advocate. (A.C.), E.R. Sumathy, AOR (SCLSC), Advocates, for the Petitioner; Mr. Atmaram N.S. Nadkarni, ASG, Ms. Shirin Khajuria, Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Ms. Rukmini Bobde, Mr. Salvador Santosh Rebello, Ms. Sneha Prabhu Tendulkar, Mr. Abhishek Bharadwaj, Mr. Gautam Sharma, Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Mr. Kumar Shashank, Mr. B.V. Balramdas, Advocates, for the Respondent

Bench
  • HON'BLE JUSTICE MR. ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
  • HON'BLE JUSTICE MR. UDAY UMESH LALIT
Eq Citations
  • (2018) 1 SCC CRI 860
  • 2018 (7) SCJ 111
  • LQ/SC/2017/1509
Head Note

Criminal Trial — Crime Scene Investigation — Videography — Use of videography for crime investigation — Use of videography for crime investigation — Issue taken up for consideration — COE to facilitate and prepare a report to formulate a road-map for use of videography in crime investigation and to propose a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) — Response of States in support of use of videography — Central Investigation Agencies have also supported the said concept — However, certain reservations have been expressed in the implementation such as funding, securing the data and storage of the same — Production and admissibility of evidence are also issues which may need to be addressed — COE is examining the matter and is likely to submit a report by the 2nd week of November, 2017 — Any further direction on the subject ought to be given by Supreme Court after considering the said report — List the matter for further consideration on 23rd November, 2017, as prayed