1. In this case, all the Courts decided against theappellant. In my opinion, they have decided rightly and I fail to follow theline of reasoning by which it is suggested that a man who was a khudhashtraiyat ceased to bold that position, because he came to certain arrangementsembodied in a pottah which professed to be a grant of miras rights by the darputnidar. The matter appears to be clear beyond argument, and we dismiss theappeal with costs.
.
Sarbananda Nath Bhowmikvs. Rana Gazi (30.05.1913 -CALHC)