Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Salimullah v. Birjhan Singh And Others

Salimullah v. Birjhan Singh And Others

(High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad)

| 16-11-1916

George Knox, J.It appears from the papers before me that Salimullah applicant on 30th June 1916 filed a complaint before a Magistrate of the first class at Ballia. The Magistrate appears to have put the complaint into his kuteheri box and to have passed no order upon it until the 17th of August 1916. I have in previous cases commented strongly upon such conduct on the part of Magistrates and I am surprised to find a Magistrate of the first class acting in this way. , Magistrates have no right whatever to keep complaints instituted before them without order, as the learned Magistrate did in this case. Such action is in the highest degree improper and shows want of proper understanding as to what their duties are. The complainant came here on the 21st 6f September and filed an application against the order of the Magistrate dismissing the complaint u/s 203 of the Code Criminal Procedure. The first two group taken in the application are not entitled weight. If the Magistrate had passed order he did in June, whether the order passed had been proper or improper, it would not have been open to attack on these that please.

2. There remains the third plea. I have thing before me to show how far the persons were seriously hurt and their injure examined in the hospital. Looking to nature of the case, I think it inexpedie after the time that has elapsed to re-open t matter; but I draw the attention of t District Magistrate to the complaint and the seriously improper action of the first class Magistrate. It will be for the Distr; Magistrate to consider whether any action should be taken to secure the keeping of t peace and at this stage I leave the case. T application is dismissed.

Advocate List
Bench
  • HON'BLE JUSTICE GEORGE KNOX, J
Eq Citations
  • AIR 1917 ALL 95 (1)
  • LQ/AllHC/1916/279
Head Note

Criminal Procedure 1898 — S. 203 — Magistrate's power to dismiss complaint — Dismissal of complaint by Magistrate — Delay in passing order on complaint — Magistrate putting complaint into his kuteheri box and passing no order upon it until 17th August 1916 — Proper course — Held, Magistrate has no right whatever to keep complaints instituted before him without order — Such action is improper and shows want of proper understanding as to what his duties are — If Magistrate had passed order in June, whether order passed had been proper or improper, it would not have been open to attack — After time elapsed, held inexpedient to re-open matter — Matter left to District Magistrate to consider whether any action should be taken to secure keeping of peace — Criminal Procedure — S. 203 — Delay in passing order