Rishipal @ Rishipal Singh Solanki v. Raju And Another

Rishipal @ Rishipal Singh Solanki v. Raju And Another

(Supreme Court Of India)

Criminal Appeal No 541 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No 1743 of 2022) | 01-04-2022

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal arises from a judgment of the Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No 49007 of 2020. The first respondent sought bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure during the pendency of the trial arising out of Case Crime No 116 of 2020 for alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (registered at police station Singhwali Ahir, District Baghpat). The application was allowed by the High Court.

3. Prior to the judgment of the High Court dated 9 November 2021, this Court in its judgment dated 5 March 2021 (Rishipal @ Rishipal Singh Solanki vs Amardeep and Others (Criminal Appeal No 271 of 2021)) had occasion to consider the correctness of an order dated 23 November 2020 granting bail to the co-accused, Amardeep and Bhushan arising out of the same FIR. By the judgment of this Court dated 5 March 2021, the order of the High Court granting bail was set aside.

4. Notice was issued in these proceedings by an order dated 21 February 2022.

5. Mr Anupam Dwivedi, counsel has appeared on behalf of the appellant. Mr Saurav Trivedi, counsel appears on behalf of the first respondent. Mr Sarvesh Singh Baghel appears on behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh.

6. We are unable to accept the approach of the High Court in granting bail to the first respondent despite the judgment of this Court dated 5 March 2021 having been specifically drawn to its notice. The High Court has not held that the case of the first respondent was distinguishable prima facie on facts for evaluating the case for the grant of bail. As a matter of fact, the reasons which have weighed with this Court in cancelling the bail which was granted to the co-accused would equally apply to the case of the first respondent which also arises out of the same first information report and incident.

7. We accordingly allow the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment and order of the High Court dated 9 November 2021 granting bail to the first respondent. The application for bail shall accordingly stand dismissed and the first respondent shall surrender no later than within a week from the date of this order.

8. If the trial is not concluded within a reasonable period, the first respondent will be at liberty to pursue the remedies which are available in law.

9. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Advocate List
Bench
  • HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
Eq Citations
  • LQ
  • 2022 (3) RCR (Criminal) 8
  • LQ/SC/2022/452
Head Note