Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Reeta Kumari Kushwaha v. M/s Shine City Infra Project Pvt. Ltd

Reeta Kumari Kushwaha v. M/s Shine City Infra Project Pvt. Ltd

(Real Estate Regulatory Authority Bihar)

Case No.CC641/2021 | 01-06-2022

1. This matter was last heard on 18.05.2022.

2. The case of the complainant is that he booked a plot E-485 in the project Tashi Sector-1 and paid Rs.2,00000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) against the booking. The respondent has failed to hand over the possession of the plot. The complainant has filed the present case praying for a refund of the amount paid along with interest or possession of the plot.

3. The complainant has placed on record a copy of ereceipts against the payment of Rs.2,00000/- duly issued by the respondent company.

4. The Authority notes that the respondent has violated Section 3 of RERA Act, 2016 as the respondent was continuously advertising, marketing, booking, selling apartments/plots without registering the real estate project with RERA. This matter may be included in the Suo Moto proceeding against the respondent company.

5. Perused the records. No reply has been filed by the respondent.

6. During the course of hearing the respondent never appeared before the Authority. An interim order was passed on 24.02.2021, directing to freeze all the bank accounts of the respondents and further directed the IG Registration not to register any apartment/plots of the aforesaid project and the matter was further referred to Economic Offence Wing of Bihar Police.

7. On the request made by the Authority, the EOU vide letter no:- 5941 dated 23.08.2021 requested the SSP, Patna to look into the matter and take necessary action against the respondent company and connected persons.

8. The Bench directs that a copy of the proceedings/order may be sent to SSP, Patna for appropriate action

9. The Bench observes that the allottee has not sent any communication to the promoter regarding cancellation of booking. The Authority ought to be approached only after the promoter fails to respond to such communication. However, since the matter has already been heard, and the promoter is not appearing, orders are being pronounced.

10. Having heard the submissions, the Bench hereby directs the respondent company and its directors to refund the principal amount of Rs.2,00000/- to the complainant along with interest at the rate of marginal cost of fund based lending rate (MCLR) of State Bank of India as applicable for three years from the date of taking the booking till the date of refund within sixty days of issue of this order.

11. With these directions and observations, the matter is disposed of.

Advocate List
Bench
  • Naveen Verma&nbsp
  • Chairman
Eq Citations
  • LQ
  • LQ/RERA/2022/1190
Head Note

Consumer Protection — Real Estate — Booking of plot/flat/apartment — Refund of amount paid — Non-registration of project with RERA — Effect — Respondent company advertising, marketing, booking, selling apartments/plots without registering real estate project with RERA — Held, respondent company liable to refund amount paid along with interest — RERA Act, 2016, S. 3 (Paras 4, 10 and 11)