Raoji Keshav Deshmukh v. Krishnarao Anandrao

Raoji Keshav Deshmukh v. Krishnarao Anandrao

(High Court Of Judicature At Bombay)

First Appeal No. 184 Of 1911 | 26-03-1914

Basil Scott, C J

[1] We cannot say that as a matter of law there was sufficient cause for extending the time under Section 5, and we do not think there was any objection to the learned Judge entertaining the question after he had provisionally admitted the appeal to the file in the absence of the respondent. We are of opinion that this is a second appeal and not a first appeal, because it is an appeal from a decree of an appellate Court. We dismiss the appeal with costs.

Advocate List
Bench
  • HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. BASIL SCOTT
  • HONBLE MR. JUSTICE BATCHELOR
Eq Citations
  • 1914 (16) BOMLR 516
  • 25 IND. CAS. 369
  • AIR 1914 BOM 111 1
  • LQ/BomHC/1914/29
Head Note

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — S. 5 — Extension of time — Sufficient cause for extension — Held, not made out