Ramgopal Namdeo v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Ramgopal Namdeo v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh

(High Court Of Madhya Pradesh)

Writ Petition No. 20643 Of 2013 | 04-12-2013

Rajendra Menon, J.Petitioners are challenging an action of the respondents in denying the benefit of second Kramonnati and proposing to make recovery of benefit already granted, the question involved in this petition already decided by a Bench of this Court in the case of Smt. Prerna W/o. Shri Promod Koranne Vs. State of M.P. and Others, in W.P. No. 6773/06, decided on 26/04/2007, and subsequently followed by this Court in series of cases, one such order passed in W.P. No. 5756/08(s), Shri R.C. Chaurasiya & Others Vs. State of M.P. & Others, decided on 26/05/2008. In the case of Smt. Prerna (Supra) the directions given is as under:

17. Consequently these petitions are allowed. The petitioners are entitled to derive the benefit of second Krammonati according to the terms and conditions mentioned in the circular dated 21/03/1983, 19/04/1999, 02/11/2001 and 03/09/2005. Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of with the following directions:

(i) Clause-3 of policy dated 03/09/2005 fixing the cut of date 01/08/2003 to grant the benefit of second Kramonnati to the teachers is arbitrary, discriminatory, hence quashed.

(ii) Teachers of Education Department or Tribal Welfare Department are held entitled to get the benefit of Kramonnati under the policy dated 21/03/1983, 19/04/1999 and 02/11/2001, in accordance with the terms and conditions as specified therein.

(iii) In view of the said directions, if the orders of recovery passed by the Government against petitioners are quashed, and if any amount is recovered from them for said reasons be refunded back to them within three months, with interest @ 6% per annum, on failure to comply the said directions within the aforesaid time, the interest @ 9% per annum will be levyable.

(iv) In some of the cases, the benefit of second Kramonnati has not been allowed to the petitioners, however on due consideration of their cases, the respondents are directed to do the needful in accordance with the policy dated 21/03/1983, 19/04/1999, 02/11/2001 and 03/09/2005 and settled their claim including post retiral and pensionary benefits within the period of 6 months from today and the arrears thereof be released along with permissible amount of interest under the law.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, the respondents shall examine the case of petitioners in the light of the aforesaid directions within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and if it is found that petitioners are also entitled to similar benefit in the light of law laid down in the case of Smt. Prerna (Supra), an appropriate speaking order be passed. Amount, if any, recovered from the petitioners in pursuance to the impugned action, shall also be refunded in case it is found that petitioners are entitled to similar benefit. Needless to emphasize that order as directed hereinabove shall be passed and communicated to the petitioners within two months.

Petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid.

C.C. as per rules.

Advocate List
Bench
  • Rajendra Menon, J
Eq Citations
  • LQ/MPHC/2013/3830
Head Note

Computation of Pay — Second Kramonnati — Denial of — Held, petitioners are entitled to derive benefit of second Kramonnati according to terms and conditions mentioned in circular dt. 21-3-1983, 19-4-1999, 2-11-2001 and 3-9-2005