Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Rajwant Singh Gill v. Om Electronic

Rajwant Singh Gill v. Om Electronic

(National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi)

Revision Petition No. 2553/2011 | 03-02-2012

State Commission has dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. On four previous dates also the petitioner had not appeared. The State Commission was justified in dismissing the revision petition for non prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on five consecutive adjourned dates of hearing. No ground for interference is made out. Dismissed. ......................J ASHOK BHAN -1- PRESIDENT ...................... VINEETA RAI MEMBER

Advocate List
Bench
  • MR. ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENT
  • MRS. VINEETA RAI, MEMBER
Eq Citations
  • LQ/NCDRC/2012/294
Head Note

CONSUMER PROTECTION — Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Ss. 21(b) & (c) — State Commission, justified in dismissing revision petition for non prosecution as petitioner failed to appear on five consecutive adjourned dates of hearing — No ground for interference made out