Rajesh And Others
v.
Ramdeo And Others
(Supreme Court Of India)
Criminal Appeal No. 795 of 2000 (Arising Out of Slp (Crl.) No. 1406 of 2000) | 15-09-2000
Leave granted.
This appeal is directed against the impugned order of the High Court of Bombay at Napery Bench in criminal writ petition directing a fresh and further investigation by an agency other than the local police, though on the basis of the FIR the local police did investigate into the matter, and in the meantime have filed charge-sheet against the accused persons. While the investigation was on, the complainant approached the High Court by filing a writ petition. The High Court has taken an unusual step of forming a panel and directing them to examine the matter, and on the basis of the said panel report, the High Court has directed a further investigation by an agency other than the local police to be headed by the Superintendent of Police. Since the investigation agency has already filed the charge-sheet on the basis of which the accused persons are being proceeded against, if any further materials are available, the Court may alter the charge framed. In the circumstances, we have no hesitation to come to the conclusion that the High Court has overstepped its jurisdiction in issuing the impugned direction calling upon further investigation into the matter, which in our considered opinion, would be an abuse of the process of the court. We, therefore, set aside the impugned order of the High Court dated 9-3-2000. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. Needless to mention, power of the investigating agency to have any further investigation exercised under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. is not being taken away by this order.
This appeal is directed against the impugned order of the High Court of Bombay at Napery Bench in criminal writ petition directing a fresh and further investigation by an agency other than the local police, though on the basis of the FIR the local police did investigate into the matter, and in the meantime have filed charge-sheet against the accused persons. While the investigation was on, the complainant approached the High Court by filing a writ petition. The High Court has taken an unusual step of forming a panel and directing them to examine the matter, and on the basis of the said panel report, the High Court has directed a further investigation by an agency other than the local police to be headed by the Superintendent of Police. Since the investigation agency has already filed the charge-sheet on the basis of which the accused persons are being proceeded against, if any further materials are available, the Court may alter the charge framed. In the circumstances, we have no hesitation to come to the conclusion that the High Court has overstepped its jurisdiction in issuing the impugned direction calling upon further investigation into the matter, which in our considered opinion, would be an abuse of the process of the court. We, therefore, set aside the impugned order of the High Court dated 9-3-2000. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. Needless to mention, power of the investigating agency to have any further investigation exercised under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. is not being taken away by this order.
Advocates List
For
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE JUSTICE G. B. PATTANAIK
HON'BLE JUSTICE U. C. BANERJEE
Eq Citation
AIR 2001 SC 2358
(2001) 10 SCC 759
LQ/SC/2000/1378
HeadNote
Constitution of India — Art. 226 — Interference in criminal matters — Further investigation — High Court directing, held, overstepped its jurisdiction in issuing impugned direction calling upon further investigation into the matter, which would be an abuse of process of court — Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Ss. 156 and 173(8)
Thank you for subscribing! Please check your inbox to opt-in.
Oh no, error happened! Please check the email address and/or try again.