Open iDraf
Pt. Parmanand Katara v. Union Of India And Another

Pt. Parmanand Katara
v.
Union Of India And Another

(Supreme Court Of India)

Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 827 Of 1991 | 19-01-1995


1. This petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, in public interest, has been filed by Pandit Parmanand Katara, Advocate. Appearing in person he has raised two contentions before us. According to him the method of execution of death sentence by hanging under the Punjab Jail Manual (the Manual) is inhuman and as such is violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The second contention raised by the petitioner is that under para 873 of the Manual, body of the condemned convict, after it falls from the scaffolds is required to remain suspended for a period of half an hour. According to him right to dignity and fair treatment continues in respect of the dead body of the condemned man

2. The first contention raised by the petitioner has been concluded against him by the judgment of this Court in Deena v. Union of India Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab and Jumman Khan v. State of U. P. Therefore, as at present advised, we do not agree with the first contention of the petitioner

3. The second contention of the petitioner is based on para 873 of the Manual which is as under

"873. Body to remain suspended half an hour. Return of warrant. - (1) The body shall remain suspended for half an hour and shall not be taken down till the medical officer declares life extinct

(2) The Superintendent shall return the warrant of execution with an endorsement to the effect that the sentence has been carried out." *


We agree with the petitioner that right to dignity and fair treatment under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is not only available to a living man but also to his body after his death. According to us, the only requirement of the above-quoted para of the Manual is that the body of the condemned prisoner shall only remain suspended till the time the medical officer, present on the spot, declares him dead. We make it clear and hold that the jail authorities in the country shall not keep the body of any condemned prisoner suspended after the medical officer has declared the person to be dead. The limitation of half an hour mentioned in para 873 is directory and is only a guideline. The only mandatory part of the above-quoted para is that the condemned person has to be declared dead by the medical officer and as soon as it is done the body has to be released from the rope. The petitioner is disposed of in the above terms.

4. No costs.

Advocates List

For

For Petitioner
  • Shekhar Naphade
  • Mahesh Agrawal
  • Tarun Dua
For Respondent
  • S. Vani
  • B. Sunita Rao
  • Sushil Kumar Pathak

Bench List

HON'BLE JUSTICE B. L. HANSARIA

HON'BLE JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH

Eq Citation

(1995) SCC CRI 464

(1995) 3 SCC 248

LQ/SC/1995/118

HeadNote

Constitution of India — Arts. 21, 136 and 32 — Human dignity and fair treatment — Right to, not only available to a living man but also to his body after his death — Punjab Jail Manual, para 873 — Requirement that body of condemned convict after it falls from the scaffold is required to remain suspended for a period of half an hour — Held, only requirement of the abovequoted para of the Manual is that the body of the condemned prisoner shall only remain suspended till the time the medical officer present on the spot declares him dead — Jail authorities in the country shall not keep the body of any condemned prisoner suspended after the medical officer has declared the person to be dead — Limitation of half an hour mentioned in para 873 is directory and is only a guideline — Only mandatory part of the abovequoted para is that the condemned person has to be declared dead by the medical officer and as soon as it is done the body has to be released from the rope (Paras 3 and 4)