Open iDraf
Pt. Madan Swaroop Shrotiya Public Charitable Trust v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others

Pt. Madan Swaroop Shrotiya Public Charitable Trust
v.
State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others

(Supreme Court Of India)

Civil Appeal No. 513-14 Of 1997 | 18-01-2000


These appeals relate to proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (Act 33 of 1976). The prescribed authority had declared an area of 4314.60 sq m of land as surplus. This order was challenged in appeal. But the appellate authority rejected the appeal whereafter a writ petition was filed in the High Court which too was dismissed. It is in these circumstances that these appeals have been filed in this Court which also granted an order of "status quo" in respect of possession of the surplus land

The Act has since been repealed by the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 (Act 15 of 1999). The legislature of the State of U.P. has since adopted the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 by a resolution as required by Article 252(2) of the Constitution. The repealing Act has since come into force in the State of U.P. with effect from 18-3-1999. The appellant has filed a supplementary affidavit dated 31-10-1999 in this Court and on that basis, it has been prayed that the present proceedings be abated. The State has not filed any reply to this affidavit

Section 4 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 provides as under

"4. Abatement of legal proceedings. - All proccedings relating to any order made or purported to be made under the principal Act pending immediately before the commencement of this Act, before any court, tribunal or other authority shall abate;

Provided that this section shall not apply to the proceedings relating to Sections 11, 12, 13 and 14 of the principal Act insofar as such proceedings are relatable to the land, possession of which has been taken over by the State Government or any person duly authorised by the State Government in this behalf or by the competent authority." *

In the counter-affidavit not a word has been said about the possession of the surplus land. In fact, it is maintained by the appellant that the possession is still with the appellant who was also granted an interim order regarding "status quo"

Since there is nothing on record to indicate that the State had taken possession over the surplus land, the present proceedings have to be abated and are hereby abated under Section 4 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999

The appeals are disposed of finally.

Advocates List

For

For Petitioner
  • Shekhar Naphade
  • Mahesh Agrawal
  • Tarun Dua
For Respondent
  • S. Vani
  • B. Sunita Rao
  • Sushil Kumar Pathak

Bench List

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.P. WADHWA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SAGHIR AHMED

Eq Citation

(2000) 6 SCC 325

2001 (1) UC 136

AIR 2000 SC 3415

2000 (3) ALLMR (SC) 474

JT 2000 (3) SC 391

LQ/SC/2000/118

HeadNote

Land and Tenancy — Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 — Repeal — Abatement of proceedings — Requirement of possession of surplus land by State Government — Appellants' possession of surplus land under status quo order — No word about possession of surplus land in counter-affidavit — Appellants maintaining that possession is still with them — In absence of anything on record to indicate that State had taken possession over surplus land, present proceedings abated under S. 4 of ULC&R Repeal Act, 1999