Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Poomalai Udayan And Others v. Karuppa Servai

Poomalai Udayan And Others v. Karuppa Servai

(High Court Of Judicature At Madras)

| 17-04-1916

1. The sale-deed in question related to a sale of an interest less than Rs. 100 in value, and its registration was therefore optional (Registration Act, Sections 17 and 18). Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, provides that a transfer of land of a value less than Rs. 100 may be made either by a registered instrument or by delivery; accordingly an unregistered instrument unaccompanied by delivery will not operate as a transfer; but no provision of law has been cited which prohibits such a document from being admitted in evidence of the contract of sale. Section 49 of the Registration Act deals only with documents required by Section 17 to be registered. We think that the present case differs from that of Muthukaruppan Samhan v. Muthu Samban 25 Ind. Cas. 772 [LQ/MadHC/1914/332] : (1914) M.W.N. 768, that there is clear evidence and a finding that there was an oral sale and a transfer of the property or delivery of possession, and the document was merely in corroboration thereof.

2. The second appeal is dismissed with costs.

Advocate List
Bench
  • HON'BLE JUSTICE PHILLIPS, J
  • HON'BLE JUSTICE BAKEWELL, J
Eq Citations
  • 34 IND. CAS. 921
  • LQ/MadHC/1916/215
Head Note

Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — S. 54 — Sale-deed relating to a sale of an interest less than Rs. 100 in value — Registration of, was optional — Held, an unregistered instrument unaccompanied by delivery will not operate as a transfer; but no provision of law has been cited which prohibits such a document from being admitted in evidence of the contract of sale — Registration Act, 1908 — Ss. 17 and 18 — Evidence Act, 1872, S. 91 — Registration Act, 1908 — S. 49