Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Pankaj Kumar Saha v. Sub-div. Officer,islampur

Pankaj Kumar Saha v. Sub-div. Officer,islampur

(Supreme Court Of India)

Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 4680 Of 1996 | 12-02-1996

K. Ramaswamy & G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.

1. This Special Leave Petition is filed against the order of the Calcutta High Court dated April 25, 1994 made in Original Order T.No. 2878/92.

2. Petitioners brother Amal Kumar Saha was granted a Scheduled Caste certificate on January 15, 1982 and the petitioner was granted a certificate on January 22, 1982. The certificate granted to the elder brother was cancelled on December 20, 1986. Said elder brother approached the High Court by way of writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution which was registered as C.O. No. 7629 of 1988. The said writ application was disposed of directing petitioners brother to file a representation. Even the representation of the brother was rejected by order dated December 18, 1991. The petitioner was served with a notice dated January 6, 1992 calling upon him to show case as to why the certificate granted to him should not be cancelled. The petitioner appeared before the authority and filed his show cause. Finally, by order dated July 9, 1992 the certificate was cancelled. The petitioners elder brother challenged the order of cancellation of his certificate by filing a writ petition, which is still pending. But the petitioners writ petition, challenging the order of cancellation was dismissed by the learned single Judge on August 27, 1992 and the Division Bench dismissed the appeal in limine on April 25, 1994. Hence the special leave petition.

3. When the matter had come up on the last occasion, we directed the learned counsel to produce the Presidential notification published under Art. 341(1) of the Constitution which has been made part of the record. It discloses that as regards the State of West Bengal, item No. 57 Sunri (excluding Saha) has been declared to be Scheduled Caste. Admittedly, the name of the petitioner has been described as Saha. He claimed the status as Sunri, a Scheduled Caste.

4. Article 366(24) defines "Scheduled Castes" to mean such castes, races or tribes or part of groups within such castes, races or tribes as are deemed under Article 341 to be Scheduled Castes for the purpose of this Constitution. Article 341(1) provides that the President may with respect to any State or Union Territory and where it is a State, after consultation with the Governor thereof, by public notification, specify the castes, races or tribes or parts of or groups within castes, races or tribes which shall for the purposes of this Constitution be deemed to be Scheduled Castes in relation to that State or Union Territory, as the case may be.

5. It is seen that in exercise of the said power, the President had issued the public notification which is called Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Order, 1950 and has been amended in 1976 after the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1976 was made. As indicated earlier, Sunri (excluding Saha) is a Scheduled Castes for the purpose of State of West Bengal. The petitioner admittedly bears the name of Saha. The authorities found as a fact that for over a century the petitioners family are Saha by caste. The President after consultation with the Governor, has excluded Saha, a liquor business community as Scheduled Caste. Though some Scheduled Castes by name Sunri adopted tapping as profession, they suffer from untouchability while Sahas, liquor business community like Sethi Balija, Edigal or Gowda in Andhra Pradesh, are not Scheduled Castes. In the notice given to the petitioner details were given and the record produced before the authorities were considered by the competent authority which held that Sahas are not the Scheduled Castes and that, therefore, they cannot be considered to be Sunris. In a recent judgment in Nityananda Sharma & Anr. v. State of Bihar & Ors. [JT 1996 (2) SC 117 [LQ/SC/1996/261] ], a Bench of three Judges had examined the scope of judicial review and power of the court to go into the question of synonyms of the caste.

6. It is now settled law that though evidence may be admissible to the limited extent of finding out whether a caste which claims the status as Scheduled Caste or Tribe was in fact included in the Presidential notification as amended under 1976 Act, the court is devoid of power of include in or exclude from or substitute or declare synonyms to be a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe. The courts would only look into the notification issued by the President to see whether the name finds place in the notification. Saha caste is expressly excluded from Sunri, a Scheduled Caste notified in the notification issued by the President in relation to the State of West Bengal which is conclusive. The certificate issued to the petitioner is, therefore, clearly unconstitutional and a fraud on the Constitution. The petitioner cannot be considered to be a Scheduled Caste.

7. Accordingly the Special Leave Petition is dismissed.

Advocate List
  • For the Appearing Parties ---
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAMASWAMY
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.B. PATTANAIK
Eq Citations
  • [1996] 2 SCR 468
  • 1996 (2) SCT 492 (SC)
  • (1996) 8 SCC 264
  • AIR 1996 SC 1728
  • 1996 2 AD (SC) 378
  • (1996) 2 MLJ 52 (SC)
  • JT 1996 (3) SC 200
  • 1996 (2) SCALE 441
  • 2 (1996) CLT 146
  • 1996 (2) SLR 66
  • 1996 (1) UJ 680
  • LQ/SC/1996/351
Head Note

Constitution of India — Arts. 341(1) and 366(24) — Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes — Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders Amendment Act, 1976 (SC and ST Orders (Amendment) Act, 1976) — Presidential notification issued under Art. 341(1) of the Constitution — Sunri excluding Saha, declared to be Scheduled Caste in relation to State of W. Bengal — Petitioner claiming status as Sunri Scheduled Caste — Held, Saha caste is expressly excluded from Sunri Scheduled Caste notified in the notification issued by the President in relation to State of W. Bengal which is conclusive — Certificate issued to petitioner is therefore clearly unconstitutional and a fraud on the Constitution — Petitioner cannot be considered to be a Scheduled Caste