P. Ashokan
v.
Union Of India And Another
(Supreme Court Of India)
Writ Petition (C) No. ...of 1997 (Diary No. 20068 of 1997) | 06-02-1998
1. On merits, we find no case to entertain this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution. Besides a three Judge Bench decision of this Court, authored by J.S. Verma, J. (as Hon'ble the Ex-Chief Justice then was) in Khoday Distilleries Limited and Anr. vs. The Page 144 has ruled a s follows:
"In a case like the present, where in substance the challenge is to the correctness of a decision on merits after it has become final, there can be no question of invoking Article 32 of the Constitution to claim reconsideration of the decision on the basis of its effect in accordance with law. such situations is wholly misconceived and impels us to emphasis this fact ."
2. We are in agreement with such view.
3. The writ petition is dismissed.
Advocates List
Manoj Swarup, Ms.Lalita Kohli, Ms. M.Swarup, Advs for M/s. Manoj Swarup &Co, Advocates.
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE JUSTICE B. N. KIRPAL
HON'BLE JUSTICE M. SRINIVASAN
Eq Citation
(1998) 3 SCC 56
[1998] 1 SCR 717
AIR 1998 SC 1219
(1998) 1 UPLBEC 754
1998 2 AD (SC) 259
JT 1998 (1) SC 511
1998 (1) SCALE 485
1 (1998) CLT 142
LQ/SC/1998/180
HeadNote
Constitution of India — Arts. 136 and 32 — Challenge to correctness of decision on merits after it has become final — Inviting reconsideration of decision on basis of its effect in accordance with law — Held, wholly misconceived — Writ petition dismissed