Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

One Earth One Life v. State Of Kerala

One Earth One Life v. State Of Kerala

(High Court Of Kerala)

WP(C) NO. 9611 OF 2021, WP(C) NO. 14386 OF 2021 | 03-04-2023

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.

1. Since common issues arise for consideration in these writ petitions, they are disposed of by this common judgment.

2. The short facts leading to the filing of W.P.(C) No.9611 of 2021 are as under:-

The Petitioner, a voluntary organisation registered under the Societies Registration Act, has filed this Public Interest writ petition aggrieved by the assignment of forest lands illegally to the persons, who were not in actual possession of the land as on 13.12.2005, under the guise of implementation of Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Forest Rights Act') and the Rules framed thereunder. The petitioner had earlier filed W.P.(C)No.35501 of 2009 seeking direction to the State of Kerala; the Secretary to the Government, Department of Revenue; the Secretary to the Government, SC & ST Department; the Secretary to the Government, Department of Forest and Wild Life and the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, respondents 1 to 5, not to assign Forest lands to the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers, who are not in actual possession as on 13.12.2005, and not more than the actual extent possessed by them, and for consequential reliefs. The petitioner states that the Ministry of Environment and Forest, as per Ext. P2 letter dated 23.09.2010, has requested the Chief Secretaries of all States to issue strict directions that the plots of assigned land should be located on the ground boundaries surveyed and plotted on a map duly signed by the concerned authorities and Tribal Department to give funds for erecting boundary pillars whose GPS reading should be recorded and entered in revenue and forest department records and on the Patta. W.P. (C)No.35501 of 2009 was disposed of by the Division Bench of this Court on 14.07.2015 holding that forest land can be assigned only with reference to the property in possession of the forest dwellers or the tribals, as the case may be, and that, it is not open for the Government to assign any extent of land to the forest dwellers other than the land in their actual possession. The petitioner states that the Divisional Forest Officer, Mannarkad, vide Ext. P3 letter dated 05.02.2020, has returned 163 applications for record of rights, to the Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Attappady, respondent No.7 herein, requesting to complete the survey and demarcation of the forest lands by a joint verification as per the procedure prescribed in the Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Rules, 2007, (hereinafter referred to as 'Forest Rights Rules'). The Sub Collector, RDO Office, Ottappalam, respondent No.5 herein, has submitted Ext. P4 report dated 02.03.2020 to the District Collector with copy to the Divisional Forest Officer, Aranyakam, Mannarkkad, 6th respondent stating that all the objections raised by the Divisional Forest Officer were discussed already in SDLC and DLC and that the refusal to countersign is an act of questioning the authority of Grama Sabhas, FRC, SDLC and DLC. The Divisional Forest Officer, Mannarkad has issued Ext. P5 letter dated 10.03.2020 to the Sub-Collector Ottapalam, to return 107 applications for record of rights to complete the survey and demarcation of the forest lands as per the procedure prescribed by Rule 12 A of the Forest Rights (Amendment) Rules, 2012. The Forest Range Officer, Attappady has submitted Ext. P6 report before the Sub-Collector Ottappalam stating that 13 applications coming under the said Range are in respect of Teak Plantations in the possession of the Forest Department. However, the District Level Committee and the Sub-Collector, Ottappalam, respondents Nos.4 and 5, are proceeding quite arbitrarily with the issue of record of forest rights, which is causing rampant destruction of the forest and defeat the purpose of the Forest Rights Act.

3. On these facts, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-

“(i) Issue a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.4 not to approve and grant record of rights in respect of Forest lands to the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers which is not in their actual possession as on 13.12.2005.

(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents 4 to 6 to survey and demarcate the boundaries of land in actual possession of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers, and to erect boundary pillars and to record the GPS coordinates in revenue and forest department records and the Record of Forest Right.”

4. When the writ petition came up for admission, this Court passed an interim order directing the District Level Committee not to approve and grant Record of Forest Right to the Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers without surveying and demarcating the boundaries of land in their actual possession.

5. W.P.(C) No.14386 of 2021 is filed by the same petitioner aggrieved by the assignment of forest lands coming under Olakara Forest Station in Peechi-Vazhani Wild Life Sanctuary, illegally, under the guise of implementation of Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2005 and the Rules framed thereunder. It is contended that, though the Forest Rights Act envisages protection of the rights of the scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers who are in occupation and cultivation of the lands for generations, respondents 4 and 5 have taken a decision to grant forest rights in respect of uncultivated and virgin dense forest lands to the scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers. The petitioner has made the following prayers in the writ petition:-

“(i) Issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to Exhibit-P4 and P6 and quash the same as illegal.

(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.4 to 6 not to grant record of rights to the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers, at Olakara Colony coming under Olakara Forest Station in Peechi-Vazhani Wild life Sanctuary, in respect of Forest lands which is not in their actual possession as on 13.12.2005.

(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents 4 to 7 to survey and demarcate the boundaries of land in actual possession of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers as on 13.12.2005, at Olakara Colony coming under Olakara Forest Station in PeechiVazhani Wild life Sanctuary and to erect boundary pillars and to record the GPS coordinates in revenue and forest department records and the Record of Forest Right.”

6. This Court, on 02.09.2021, passed an interim order not to grant Record of Forest Right to the scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers without surveying and demarcating the boundaries of land in their actual possession as on 13.12.2005.

7. A detailed counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the 6th respondent, the District Forest Officer, Mannarkad in W.P.(C) No.9611 of 2021 and it is apposite to extract the relevant portions therein which read as under:-

“4. With regard to the averments in paragraph 2 of the writ petition, the Forest Department has taken steps to give effect to the provisions of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act 2005 (hereinafter “Forest Rights Act”) and has settled several claims under the Forest Rights Act of Schedule Tribe people residing inside the forests. However, assigning virgin forest lands to ineligible persons under the guise of implementation of the Forest Rights Act has to be guarded against.

5. The averments in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the writ petition regarding Exhibit-P1 judgment and Exhibit-P2 letter admittedly pertain to the implementation of settlement of claims for record of rights under the Forest Rights Act.

6. Regarding the averments in paragraph 5 of the writ petition, it is submitted that via Exhibit-P3 letter dated 05.02.2020, 6th respondent has returned 163 numbers of applications for individual rights to the 7th respondent and requested the 7th respondent to complete the survey and demarcation of forest land by a joint verification as per the procedure prescribed under Rule 12A of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Rules 2007 (hereinafter “Forest Rights Rules”). Subsequently, Joint verification of 75 applications included in this 163 number of applications were conducted and Records of Rights were issued to 70 eligible applicants. 5 applications were rejected since it was found that no agriculture practices were carried out at any point of time during the joint verification. Details of applications in which Records of Rights were issued or rejected along with other such similar applications are submitted in the table mentioned in Para 11 and 12 of this counter affidavit.

7. Moreover, vide Exhibit-P5 letter dated 10.03.2020, the 6th respondent had informed the 5th respondent Sub Collector, that 107 applications regarding Forest Rights in Agali and Puthur Panchayaths submitted before Sub Divisional Level Committee (hereinafter “SDLC”) should not be considered since the procedure laid down in Rule 12A of Forest Rights Rules was not followed in respect of the said applications. A comprehensive survey to measure and demarcate such lands was not conducted at that point of time. Subsequently Joint verification and comprehensive survey of 38 applications included in this 107 number of applications were conducted and Records of Rights were issued to 37 eligible applicants. 1 application was rejected since it was found that no agriculture practices were carried out at any point of time during the joint verification. Details of applications in which Records of Rights were issued or rejected along with other such similar applications are submitted in the table mentioned in Para 11 and 12 of this counter affidavit.

8. Exhibit-P4 letter mentioned in paragraph 6 of the writ petition was issued by the 5th respondent Sub Collector as the Chairperson of the SDLC to the 6th respondent.

9. It is submitted that the joint verification and demarcation of lands mentioned in the above applications have not been done so far. In this regard, Ext.P1 judgment of this Honourable Court in Writ Petition (C) No. 35501/2009 filed by 'One Earth One Life' which relate to the issue of illegal assignment of forest land under the guise of implementation of Forest Rights Act and Rules framed there under is binding on the State and assume importance. Therefore any recognition of rights should be based on the actual extent of land held by the claimant under the Forest Rights Act as on the relevant date. Recognition of rights or issuance of record of rights over forest land has to be done only in respect of eligible persons. So under no circumstances, ineligible persons are conferred with Record Of Rights under the Forest Rights Act.

10. Nearly 740 applications have already been disposed granting Record of Rights to Tribals. Further there were 429 applications pending for issuance of Record Of Rights as on 13.10.2021, which were in issue, out of which 225 Record Of Rights were signed by this respondent and the 7th respondent and submitted to 4 th Respondent. So total applications so far disposed granting Record Of Rights is 965 applications. For the above 225 applications for Record Of Rights, joint verification was carried out by Forest and Revenue Departments and GPS readings were recorded and extent of land was recalculated. 225 Record Of Rights were signed by this respondent only after joint verification for further action. True copy of joint verification report of the Forest Department in respect of one such application is produced herewith and marked as Exhibit-R6(a). Letters dated 30.12.2021, 13.01.2022, 27.01.2022, 03.02.2022, 08.03.2022, 13.04.2022, 16.06.2022, 13.07.2022 and 01.02.2023 were sent to 7th respondent by this respondent to carry out demarcation of these plots using survey stones, true copies of which are produced herewith and marked as Exhibit-R6(b), Exhibit-R6(c), ExhibitR6(d), Exhibit-R6(e), Exhibit-R6(f), Exhibit-R6(g), ExhibitR6(h), Exhibit-R6(i) and Exhibit-R6(j) respectively.

11. All the above said 225 applications for Record Of Rights were processed by this respondent only after joint verification as prescribed in Rule 12A of Forest Rights Act and submitted to 4th Respondent for signing and final issuance of Record of Rights. This is in accordance with the decision of the District Level Committee meeting dated 09.12.2021 in which, the matter of joint verification of Revenue and Forest was decided and process of demarcation was entrusted to the 7th Respondent. True copy of minutes dated 09.12.2021 of the District Level Committee is produced herewith and marked as Exhibit-R6(k). A total of SUM(ABOVE) Hectares (710.34 acres) of land were assigned exclusively to Tribal People belonging to Irula, Muduga and Kurumba communities in Attappady Taluk. Details of persons, their hamlet, extent of land for which the above 225 Record of Rights were issued are submitted in table given below.

Sl.

No.

Name

Name of FRC

Extent

(In Hectare)

1

Chellan S/o Maruthan

Kollankadavu

0.5587

2

Valliyamma W/o Nanchan

Venthavetty

0.7611

3

Chindan S/o Kali

Galazi

3.5829

4

Rengi W/o Maruthan

Chittur

0.3684

5

Ponni W/o Kali

Galazi

3.7570

6

Nanchan S/o Chellan

Koolankadavu

0.8299

7

Sivani W/o Rengan

Chittur

0.4898

8

Omana W/o Rengan

Chittur

0.7935

9

Omana W/o Rajan

Chittur

0.5506

10

Maruthi W/o Karamadayan

Thekkupana

0.2105

11

Murukesan S/o Maniyan

Thekkupana

1.0161

12

Chellan S/o Kakki

Thekkupana

1.1983

13

Pazhani S/o Thamandan

Karadippara

0.7732

14

Lakshmi D/o Mari

Vendavetti

0.8744

15

Mallika W/o Pappachan

Chittur

0.3320

16

Pacha S/o Mallan

Chittur

0.0769

17

Sivasankaran S/o Nanchan

Chittur

0.3562

18

Radha W/o Prakash

Chittur

0.1255

19

Rajamma W/o Das

Chittur

0.4211

20

Krishnakumar S/o

Lakshmanan

Chittur

0.3481

21

Panchi W/o Maruthan

Chemmannur

0.1255

22

Babu S/o Rengan

Karadipara

0.8987

23

Rejitha W/o Murukan

Chemmannur

0.2388

24

Murukan S/o Mammu

Karadipara

0.3968

25

Maruthan S/o Raman

Chemmannur

0.6437

26

Sindhu W/o Sibin Kumar

Chemmannur

0.2348

27

Pappathi W/o Subramanian

Chittur

0.7125

28

Rengan S/o Velayudhan

Chittur

0.7732

29

Raju S/o Bhatty

Chittur

0.7854

30

Gopalakrishnan S/o Pacha

Chittur

0.4048

31

Parvathi W/o Shanmughan

Chittur

0.3846

32

Karumi W/o Kara

Chemmanur

0.2589

33

Subramanian S/o Ponmala

Chemmanur

0.6397

34

Rangan S/o Chathan

Nellippathy

1.5466

35

Rangan S/o Lincon

Nellipathy

1.1538

36

Rengi W/o Chellan

Mettuvazhi

0.2955

37

Vellingiri S/o Kurumban

Thazhe Kakkupadi

0.2227

38

Ponni W/o Velli

Mele Kakkuppadi

0.3157

39

Sumathi W/o Panali

Mele Kakkuppadi

0.4737

40

Sival W/o Maruthan

Odapetty

0.9271

41

Rengi W/o Mari

Oonthumala

1.9190

42

Aandi S/o Maruthan

Oonthumala

2.3725

43

Thurandan S/o Kuppan

Oonthumala

0.3846

44

Kali S/o. Rengan

Oonthumala

1.1660

45

Rajan S/o Kuppan

Oonthumala

0.2551

46

Murugan S/o Nanchan

Oonthumala

0.0931

47

Masani W/o Maruthan

Kollankadavu

0.8745

48

Maruthan S/o Kadalan

Mele Kandiyoor

0.4413

49

Kannan S/o Rengan

Mele Kakkuppadi

1.3522

50

Kuppan S/o Mari

Mele Kakkuppadi

0.3522

51

Velli D/o Kali

Mele Kakkuppadi

0.2914

52

Nanjan S/o Devaran

Kollankadavu

1.2591

53

Murukan S/o Maruthan

Kozhikkoodam

1.0607

54

Murukan S/o Thamandan

Kozhikkoodam

0.6396

55

Rengan S/o Karamooppan

Vechappathi

2.4170

56

Maruthi W/o Poosari

Vechappathi

0.8734

57

Sivadas S/o Subramanian

Vechappathi

1.4898

58

Kamala W/o Kakki

Karara

0.5587

59

Vellingiri S/o Chinnan

Karara

0.8987

60

Pappan S/o Muthu

Karara

0.4736

61

Shanmughan S/o Rengan

Karara

1.2995

62

Chandran S/o Chellan

Karara

0.5829

63

Sankaran S/o Aandi

Venthavetti

0.9352

64

Chinnan S/o Sivan

Karara

1.0121

65

Mari S/o Mallan

Edavani

0.4412

66

Lingan S/o mallan

Edavani

3.7327

67

Rengan S/o Chandran

Panganaripallam

0.3400

68

Maruthan S/o Chetti

Venthavetti

0.9311

69

Murukesh S/o Pandi

Venthavetti

1.8461

70

Mannappa W/o Vellingiri

Mele Chootra

1.3238

71

Velayudhan S/o Chellan

Karara

0.4615

72

Gelan S/o Krishnan

Mele Chootra

0.7368

73

Patara S/o Raman

Aanagadha

1.2105

74

Chandran S/o Koman

Karara

0.5748

75

Maruthan S/o Mari

Onthumala

0.9838

76

Chelli W/o Ravi

Kallamala

1.7287

77

Mari W/o Kali

Kathirampathi

1.1133

78

Kaliyamma W/o Nanchan

Kathirampathi

0.6113

79

Latha W/o Chinnan

Karara

1.0404

80

Chellan S/o Rankan

Karara

1.0202

81

Sivaraman S/o Velli

Chittur

1.1214

82

Venu S/o Nanchan

Chittur

0.8097

83

Vadukan S/o Rangan

Mettuvazhi

0.2874

84

Pappa W/o Haridas

Kattekkad

0.9757

85

Lakshmi W/o Vellingiri

Kattekkad

0.1659

86

Radha W/o Thangaraj

Kattekkad

1.3603

87

Mani S/o Mallan

Kattekkad

0.4696

88

ThamandanS/o Kali

Nellippathi

1.2226

89

Kakki S/o Kadukka

Nellippathi

0.7490

90

Lakshmi W/o Vijayan

Karadippara

0.6879

91

Panali S/o Nagan

Edavani

1.4939

92

Kurumban S/o Murukan

Edavani

2.1619

93

Chathan S/o Velli

Edavani

0.5263

94

Panali S/o Chathan

Edavani

3.4979

95

Linkan.V S/o Velli

Edavani

2.1700

96

Vellan S/o Chathan

Edavani

3.2914

97

Murukan S/o Panali

Edavani

3.7287

98

Chathan S/o Panali

Edavani

3.3886

99

Maruthan S/o Chinnakunan

Pudur

1.5506

100

Kuppan S/o Karimutty

Pudur

1.7894

101

Maruthi W/o Vella

Chootra

3.1214

102

Chellan S/o Nanchan

Chootra

2.4777

103

Seethe S/o Nanchan

Chootra

2.3157

104

Ponnan S/o Jadayan

Chootra

2.7935

105

Barmman S/o Velli

Mele Kakkuppadi

0.0729

106

Parvathy W/o Latheef

Thazhe Kakkuppadi

0.2672

107

Malli W/o Maruthan

Mele Chootra

3.3279

108

Panali S/o Mallan

Pudur

3.7368

109

Lakshmanan S/o Velli

Pudur

1.1295

110

Ayappan S/o Kurumban

Edavani

3.233

111

Rengan S/o Krishnan

Mele Chootra

2.2469

112

Chandran S/o Velli

Edavani

4.000

113

Nanchan S/o Jadayan

Thazhe Chootra

2.3157

114

Eswaran S/o Krishnan

Mele Chootra

2.2995

115

Velli S/o Chembooli

Kulappadi

1.7489

116

Raman S/o Maniyan

Kulappadi

1.1740

117

Patti S/o Chembooli

Kulappadi

2.9230

118

Manian S/o Chembooli

Kulappadi

2.9433

119

Masannan S/o Chembooli

Kulappadi

2.2550

120

Maruthan S/o Thavidan

Thekkuppana

0.5344

121

Chandran S/o Karamadayan

Thekkuppana

2.417

122

Panali S/o Jadayan

Vallavetti

1.0890

123

Mookan S/o Kali Mooppan

Vallavetti

0.3765

124

Renki W/o Dhasan

Vallavetti

0.6133

125

Murukan S/o Jadayan

Vallavetti

0.6842

126

Mannappa W/o Murukan

Swarnagadda

0.7530

127

Manikandan S/o Rengan

Swarnagadda

1.1336

128

Kanakaraj S/o Bothiyan

Pudur

0.5829

129

Rengan S/o Kadodi

Pudur

0.4129

130

Nanchi W/o Murugan

Pudur

1.3927

131

Rami W/o Chinnan

Pudur

1.0404

132

Vaduki W/o Kannan

Pudur

1.0769

133

Ganesan S/o Paru Chami

Pudur

0.8259

134

Ayyapan S/o Aandi

Swarnagadda

1.3927

135

Pappa W/o Karti

Swarnagadda

1.2834

136

Chinnathottan S/o Murukan

Swarnagadda

1.0850

137

Vanchi W/o Rangan

Swarnagadda

0.8178

138

Malli W/o Kadan

Galazi

3.9900

139

Rami W/o Konan

Pudur

1.5344

140

Aani W/o Chathan

Aralikonam

1.5992

141

Kakki S/o Periyakali

Aralikonam

2.2915

142

Budran S/o Chathan

Aralikonam

2.5870

143

Vellingiri S/o Resan

Aralikonam

1.3846

144

Balan S/o Chathan

Aralikonam

1.3846

145

Kavan S/o Kara

Aralikonam

2.6073

146

Resi W/o Panali

Aralikonam

0.4493

147

Palli S/o Masanan

Aralikonam

1.3886

148

Ravi S/o Masanan

Aralikonam

0.9028

149

Resi W/o Dhora

Aralikonam

1.445

150

Rankan S/o Aandi

Vellamari

0.2510

151

Rankan S/o Nanchan

Thazhe Chootra

3.3319

152

Manikandan S/o Nanchan

Thazhe Chootra

3.1457

153

Nagaraj S/o Rankan

Thazhe Chootra

1.1740

154

Babu S/o Manikandan

Thazhe Chootra

2.2631

155

Pappa W/o Panali

Mele Chootra

3.2064

156

Chindi D/o Nagan

Mele Chootra

3.8663

157

Kallan S/o Nagan

Mele Chootra

2.5222

158

Kara S/o Nagan

Mele Chootra

3.3846

159

Kumar S/o Vellingiri

Mele Chootra

3.643

160

Maruthan S/o Vella

Thazhe Chootra

2.3846

161

Raman S/o Nanchan

Thazhe Chootra

2.3076

162

Lakshmi W/o Vellingiri

Pudur

2.8744

163

Ranki W/o Chellan

Pattanakkal

0.6680

164

Manappa S/o Rankan

Parappanthara

0.2064

165

Maniyan S/o Rankan

Chembuvattakkadu

0.3441

166

Rengan S/o Gandi Mooppan

Mele Chootra

2.7327

167

Kurumbi W/o Kannan

Kallamala

1.4163

168

Manu.K.M S/o Murukan

Kallamala

2.0630

169

Rengan S/o Madhavan

Galazi

3.0430

170

Kallan S/o Mallan

Kadukumanna

1.1862

171

Raman S/o Mallan

Kadukumanna

1.1579

172

K.S.Murukan S/o Soman

Kadukumanna

0.8623

173

Gopakumar S/o Murukan

Kadukumanna

0.4008

174

Sukumaran S/o Murukan

Kadukumanna

1.8461

175

Suresh S/o Rengan

Kadukumanna

1.3320

176

Vanchi W/o Nanchan

Kolappadi

1.28

177

Nanchan S/o Kali

Kolappadi

2.64

178

Kakki S/o Maniyan

Kolappadi

0.41

179

Komali Rankan S/o Kakki

Kolappadi

1.02

180

Eswaran S/o Bellan

Kolappadi

1.06

181

Puttan S/o Rankan

Kolappadi

0.99

182

Rangi W/o Rankan

Kolappadi

0.94

183

Chelli W/o Raman

Kolappadi

0.53

184

Kali W/o Nanchan

Kolappadi

0.66

185

Murukan S/o Sukkri

Thekkuppana

0.86

186

Kuppa W/o Chella

Thekkuppana

1.50

187

Sumathi W/o Murukan

Thekkuppana

1.49

188

Rankan S/o Ganda

Thekkuppana

0.98

189

Govindan S/o Nanchan

Thekkuppana

1.77

190

Chinnan S/o Velli

Thekkuppana

1.99

191

Kakki S/o Kutty

Paloor

0.45

192

Prasanth S/o Chimban

Paloor

0.55

193

Nanchan S/o Gorkkan

Paloor

0.27

194

Chelli W/o Konan

Paloor

0.68

195

Manikandan S/o Kakki

Karadippara Ooru

1.396

196

Maruthan S/o Vella

Thekupana Ooru

2.303

197

Nanchan S/o Kuruthala

Kolappadika Ooru

1.057

198

Maruthi W/o Maruthan

Paloor Ooru

1.023

199

Divya W/o Rankan

Karadippara Ooru

0.623

200

Malleeswaran.K S/o

Kalimooppan

Agali

0.8417

201

Nanchi W/o Manikandan

Agali

0.6397

202

Nanchi W/o Manivelan

Agali

0.392

203

Rangaswami S/o Chathimari

Agali

0.692

204

Nanchi W/o Raman

Cheramankandi Ooru

0.263

205

Aandi S/o Maruthan

Cheramankandi Ooru

0.158

206

Easwaran S/o Maruthan

Paloor Ooru

1.400

207

Koni S/o Nanka

Paloor Ooru

0.655

208

Maruthan S/o Dudan

Paloor Ooru

0.910

209

Rankan S/o Dakkayyan

Paloor Ooru

0.554

210

Panali S/o Kutty

Paloor Ooru

0.542

211

Kali W/o Kuppan

Pudur Ooru

0.477

212

Mandan S/o Varagan

Pudur Ooru

1.254

213

Siva W/o Aandi

Swarnagadha Ooru

2.310

214

Kalimuthu S/o Karamadayan

Thekkuppana Ooru

2.411

215

Easwaran S/o Karamadayan

Thekkuppana Ooru

0.428

216

Karamadayan S/o Kariyan

Thekkuppana Ooru

1.169

217

Resi W/o Arjunan

Swarnagadha Ooru

0.498

218

Maruthan S/o Chiriyan

Paloor Ooru

0.785

219

Kuttiyannan S/o Chathan

Paloor Ooru

1.371

220

Nanchi W/o Aandi

Chutra Ooru

1.861

221

Kali S/o Maruthan

Cheramankandi

Ooru

0.166

222

Kakki S/o Puliyan

Swarnagadha Ooru

2.654

223

Kali W/o Gopalan

Agali Thazhe Ooru

0.3399

224

Nagaraj S/o Ooma

Agali Thazhe Ooru

0.6510

225

Vellingiri S/o Charakan

Paloor Ooru

1.1011

TOTAL

287.4701

(710.34 acres)

12. After the aforesaid 225 applications have been processed, regarding the remaining 204 applications, the following developments have taken place. Out of the balance 204 applications, 7 applications were not considered for issuance of Record of Rights since it was found that no agriculture practices were carried out at any point of time during the joint verification. Details of the 7 applications which were rejected are submitted in the table below. 

Sl. No.

Name

Name of FRC

Extent Claimed (Hectares)

1

Panali S/o Killan

Edavani

2.5506

2

Pazhaniyamma W/o Raman

Venthavetty

0.8663

3

Raman S/o Thora Mooppan

Swarnagadha

1.9797

4

Veeran S/o Velli

Vayaloor

0.3441

5

Sindhu W/o Mani

Vayaloor

0.6923

6

Pappathi W/o Varghese

Vayaloor

0.2469

7

Nanchi D/o Maruthan

Vayaloor

0.4251

TOTAL

7.1050

(17.56

acres)

13. One applicant has demanded to issue patta as per Land Assignment Act and not Record of Rights as per Forest Rights Act and hence her application could not be considered under the Forest Rights Act and Rules.

14. Regarding another 24 applications, it is submitted that Joint verification was over and process of issuance of Record of Rights in respect of these 24 applications is going on and forms of Record of Rights have been returned to the 7th Respondent for correction of Plot Number after joint verification. Details of extent of land and places where they are claiming to be assigned vide the aforesaid 24 applications are submitted in the table below. 

Sl.

No.

Name

Name of FRC

Extent Claimed (Hectare)

1

Nanchi W/o Rengan

Kollamkadavu

0.26

2

Masani W/o Chellan

Kookampalayam

0.34

3

Kali W/o Sivan

Kookampalayam

0.25

4

Manikandan S/o Chellan

Kookampalayam

0.24

5

Maruthan S/o Kakki

Cheramankandi

0.10

6

Murukan S/o Rengan

Vellavatty

0.98

7

Panali S/o Rengan

Kolappady

3.66

8

Karamadayan S/o Sukiri

Kolappady

0.00

9

Kali S/o Jogi

Thekkupana

2.51

10

Andishi W/o Murukan

Karadipara

0.49

11

Maruthan S/o Raman

Kollamkadavu

0.65

12

Ambili W/o Shanmugan

Chittur

0.40

13

Rankan S/o Mari

Thazhe Kakkuppadi

0.24

14

Chelli W/o Raman

Thazhe Kakkuppadi

0.30

15

Maruthan S/o Muthu

Karara

0.51

16

Sumathi W/o Venu

Karara

0.93

17

Karnan S/o Venu

Karara

0.38

18

Rami W/ Manikyan

Mele Kakkupadi

0.37

19

Renjitha W/o Kuttan

Kallamala

1.82

20

Kalimuthu S/o Kadan

Kathirampathi

1.78

21

Nanchan S/o Kali

Kathirampathi

0.40

22

Chathi W/o Vella

Mele Kakkupadi

0.31

23

Bindu D/o Mariamma

Mele Kakkupadi

0.27

24

Mali W/o Kesavan

Mele Kakkupadi

0.34

TOTAL

17.53

(43.32

acres)

15. Joint verification is pending in respect of 172 applications including 155 applications in respect of which the Forest Department has raised objections. Details of the 17 applications pending joint survey are submitted in the table below.

Sl. No

Beneficiary Name

Name of FRC

Extent in (Hectares)

1

Rengamma W/o Maruthan

Kollamkadavu

0.45

2

Panali S/o Periyakali

Aralikonam

2.55

3

Lakshmanan S/o Resan

Mele Kandiyur

0.56

4

Nanchan S/o Male

Kolappady

1.87

5

Bokkan S/o Mannan

Kolappady

0.96

6

Vellingiri S/o Maruthan

Kolappady

0.59

7

Saathi W/o Makkulan

Kolappady

1.58

8

Goosy W/o Maruthan

Kolappady

1.57

9

Lakshmanan S/o Kumaran

Kolappady

0.78

10

Vally W/o Rangan

Chootara-1

2.33

11

Raju S/o Mannamooppan

Chootara-1

3.50

12

Vella S/o Nagan

Chootara-1

2.79

13

Manikandan S/o Chinnarajan

Thekkupana

0.37

14

Murukan S/o Chinnarangan

Thekkupana

2.00

15

Murukan S/o Kali

Galasi

3.47

16

Chandrasekaran S/o Kali

Galasi

4.06

17

Madhavan S/o Kadan (Mathan)

Galasi

3.57

Total

33.00

(81.54

acres)

 16. Details of 155 applications where objections of the Forest Department, based on initial survey, pertain to either absence of any agricultural practice or absence of occupancy or due to pendency of litigation under the Kerala Private Forest (Vesting and Assignment) Act, are submitted in the table below.

Sl. No

Beneficiary Name

Name of FRC

Extent in (Hectares)

1

Babu S/o Rankan

Adiya Kandiyur

0.40

2

Nanchi W/o Rangan

Adiya Kandiyur

0.41

3

Rangan S/o Chinnayan

Adiya Kandiyur

0.18

4

Mari S/o Maruthan

Adiya Kandiyur

0.31

5

Koyan S/o Chellan

Adiya Kandiyur

0.21

6

Pottani S/o Veeran

Adiya Kandiyur

0.23

7

Mari W/o Maruthan

Adiya Kandiyur

0.13

8

Mottan S/o Kuppan

Nellipathi Ooru

0.44

9

Mari W/o Maniyan

Nellipathi Ooru

0.74

10

Rajamma W/o Kumar

Nellipathi Ooru

0.68

11

Raman S/o Sankaran (Rengan)

Nellipathi Ooru

1.60

12

Karan S/o Boppan

Nellipathi Ooru

0.42

13

Maruthi W/o Maruthan

Nellipathi Ooru

0.46

14

Lingan S/o Kuppan

Nellipathi Ooru

0.70

15

Aandi S/o Nanchan

Nellipathi Ooru

0.42

16

Nanchan S/o Kuppan

Nellipathi Ooru

0.55

17

Raman S/o Resan

Nellipathi Ooru

0.76

18

Cheeli W/o Sivan

Nellipathi Ooru

1.26

19

Kali W/o Kali

Nellipathi Ooru

0.45

20

Ponnn S/o Lingan

Nellipathi Ooru

0.54

21

Vijaykumar S/o Vanan

Nellipathi Ooru

0.61

22

Aandi S/o Jungan

Nellipathi Ooru

0.33

23

Sayindhan S/o Rangan

Nellipathi Ooru

0.56

24

Mari W/o Raman

Nellipathi Ooru

0.52

25

Masanan S/o Jungan

Nellipathi Ooru

0.72

26

Pali S/o Masanan

Mettuvazhi

0.71

27

Kamala W/o Ramachandran

Mettuvazhi

0.82

28

Nagan S/o Chellan

Kollamkadavu

0.93

29

Selvi W/o Na Nchan

Kollamkadavu

0.55

30

Kovilan S/o Maruthan

Kollamkadavu

0.50

31

Sumathy W/o Karuppan

Mele Kakkupadi

0.42

32

Mari S/o Rengan

Mele Kakkupadi

0.29

33

Rengan S/o Kakki

Mele Kandiyur

0.40

34

Sarasamma W/o Maruthan

Mele Kandiyur

0.38

35

Vasantha D/o Pacha

Mele Kandiyur

0.50

36

Nanchan S/o Kadalan

Mele Kandiyur

0.69

37

Maruthan S/o Konan

Mele Kandiyur

1.10

38

Maruthachalam S/o Rengan

Mele Kandiyur

1.47

39

Chandran S/o Rengan

Mele Kandiyur

0.64

40

Kurmarn S/o Nanchan

Mele Kandiyur

0.94

41

Kali W/o Chathan

Mele Kandiyur

0.83

42

Jayanthi W/o Maruthan

Mele Kandiyur

0.84

43

Radha W/o Saravanan

Karara

1.53

44

Madhavan S/o Aandi

Karara

1.45

45

Rankan S/o Annamalai

Kathirampathi

0.51

46

Nanchan S/o Vellakutti

Kathirampathi

1.63

47

Lakshmi W/o Kakki

Kallamala

1.55

48

Satheesh S/o Lakshmanan

Kallamala

0.75

49

Lakshmi W/o Lingan

Kallamala

0.59

50

Lakshmi W/o Suresh

Kallamala

0.91

51

Rajan S/o Kuruban

Kallamala

1.30

52

Chelli W/o Nagan

Kallamala

1.57

53

Soudha W/o Suni

Kallamala

0.89

54

Bineetha W/o Ramesh

Kallamala

1.42

55

Ajeesh S/o Vijayan

Kallamala

0.95

56

Nisha W/o Premkumar

Kallamala

0.87

57

Chinnamma W/o Ramesh

Kallamala

0.67

58

Krishnakumari W/o Rangan

Kallamala

0.89

59

Sobharaj S/o Kadan

Kallamala

0.36

60

Chanrdan S/o Kakki

Kallamala

0.77

61

Vijaya W/o Chandran

Kallamala

1.56

62

Thankamani W/o Kadan

Kallamala

0.60

63

Chelli W/o Chinnan

Kallamala

1.25

64

Santha W/o Sivadas

Kallamala

0.45

65

Radha W/o Suresh

Kallamala

1.43

66

Bindhu W/o Suresh

Kallamala

1.03

67

Mallika W/o Mani

Kallamala

1.34

68

Kuppan S/o Konkara

Kallamala

1.28

69

Suresh S/o Kannan

Kallamala

0.97

70

Makkula Moopan S/o Rangamoopan

Kalkkandiyoor

1.04

71

Malleswaran S/o Rangan

Kalkkandiyoor

1.31

72

Valli W/o Arumugan

Kalkkandiyoor

0.53

73

Chellan S/o Nanchan

Kalkkandiyoor

0.59

74

Vally W/o Maruthan

Kalkkandiyoor

0.63

75

Rengan S/o Kakky

Kalkkandiyoor

0.70

76

Murukan H/O Muruki

Kalkkandiyoor

0.67

77

Rengi W/o Maruthan

Onthumala

0.72

78

Geetha W/o Kumaran

Onthumala

0.46

79

Manikkandan S/o Mann Moopan

Chootara-1

3.12

80

Murukesh S/o Manikandan

Chootara-1

2.44

81

Muthuswami S/o Manikandan

Chootara-1

2.02

82

Lakshmi W/o Biju

Onthumala

0.48

83

Rengi W/o Murukan

Mele Kakkuppadi

0.45

84

Velli S/o Rengan

Mele Kakkuppadi

0.27

85

Suresh S/o Kuppan

Chittur

0.35

86

Vijayasudha W/o Jeorge

Chittur

0.07

87

Pradeepkumar S/o Kurumban

Chittur

2.77

88

Nishadh S/o Pappan

Kallamala

2.12

89

Vijayan S/o Nagan

Kallamala

2.53

90

Lakshmanan S/o Kannan

Kallamala

3.29

91

Santhosh S/o Lakshmanan

Kallamala

3.88

92

Ratheesh S/o Kuppan

Kallamala

2.28

93

Raju KK

Kallamala

2.59

94

Reji KK

Kallamala

3.59

95

Unnimery W/o Veeran

Kallamala

1.49

96

Raju S/o Kuppan

Kallamala

1.73

97

Velli S/o Rangan

Kallamala

1.98

98

Omana W/o Rangan

Kallamala

2.04

99

Bineesh S/o Veeran

Kallamala

3.40

100

Anoop S/o Ayyappan

Kallamala

2.79

101

Rama W/o Ayyappan

Kallamala

2.20

102

Deepa W/o Nandhakumar

Kallamala

1.70

103

Santhosh S/o Nagan

Kallamala

2.14

104

Ambili W/o Chellan

Kallamala

1.05

105

Sumathi W/o Mari

Kallamala

2.91

106

Chelli W/o Puliyan

Kallamala

3.63

107

M.N.Kali

Kallamala

1.93

108

Valli W/o Anil

Kallamala

0.97

109

Nanchan S/o Resan

Kathirampathi

1.15

110

Sarasa W/o Ayyappan

Kathirampathi

1.61

111

Panchans S/o Chellan

Kathirampathi

1.19

112

Murukan S/o Kuppan

Kathirampathi

1.73

113

Kali S/o Raman

Kathirampathi

1.05

114

Selvi W/o Rangan

Kathirampathi

0.62

115

Kali S/o Chellan

Konamkuthy

1.16

116

Nanchan S/o Vasakan

Vendhavatty

0.62

117

Sindhu W/o Shiju

Odapetty

1.78

118

Shyni W/o Kalimuthu

Kattekkad

0.93

119

Shoba W/o Shijo

Kattekkad

0.25

120

Rajan S/o Konkara

Kattekkad

0.57

121

Veeran S/o Nagan

Kattekkad

2.16

122

Chandran S/o Rangan

Kattekkad

0.70

123

Ayyappan S/o Rangan

Kattekkad

0.58

124

Rangan S/o Mari

Kattekkad

0.42

125

Rajendran S/o Soman

Kattekkad

1.38

126

Rangan S/o Nagan

Kattekkad

0.76

127

Ravikumar S/o Raju

Kattekkad

0.93

128

Sugumaran S/o Maniyamooppan

Karathoor

0.32

129

Murukan S/o Maniyamooppan

Karathoor

0.45

130

Lakshmanan S/o Palan

Karathoor

1.34

131

Maruthan S/o Maniyamoopan

Karathoor

0.22

132

Pazhaniswami S/o Mannan(Maniyamoopan)

Karathoor (Sl.No. 246)

1.43

133

Nanchan S/o Kali

Vechapathi

2.89

134

Velli (Vellingiri) S/o Kuppan

Vechapathi

0.62

135

Vijayalakshmi W/o Murukeshan

Karara

0.45

136

Sulojana W/o Kunchukuttan

Karara

0.51

137

Chelli W/o Veeran

Karara

0.51

138

Kalimuthu S/o Pappan

Karara

0.55

139

Vinod S/o Kongara

Karara

0.95

140

Mari D/o Kali

Mele Kakkupadi

0.23

141

Raman S/o Maruthan

Kathirampathi

0.47

142

Rangan S/o Annamala

Kathirampathi

0.51

143

Nanchan S/o Vellakutty

Kathirampathi

1.63

144

Rangi W/o Chellan

Mettuvazhi

0.30

145

Mari S/o Mallan

Kallamala

1.74

146

Masani W/o Rangan

Kallamala

0.27

147

Dhundan S/o Nanchan

Kallamala

0.37

148

Pappathi W/o Mannan

Kallamala

0.43

149

Krishnankutty S/o Rangan

Kallamala

0.08

150

Rami W/o Rangan

Kallamala

0.15

151

Kakki S/o Nanchan

Kallamala

0.97

152

Ayyappan S/o Kara

Kallamala

0.32

153

Manikyan S/o Krishnan

Edavani

2.43

154

Vijaya W/o Vella (Late)

Edavani

2.34

155

Jayan S/o Krishnan

Edavani

1.21

Total

166.30

(410.93

acres)

 17. As already stated, in respect of 740 applications, Record Of Rights has been given to Tribals. Regarding the remaining claims, the present status of Record Of Rights in respect of claims in issue are as follows.

Total applications in issue

429

Applications allowed

225

Rejected

7

Rejected as not considered

1

Application    pending    corrections    after                    Joint verification

24

Joint Survey Pending

17

Joint Survey pending where Forest Department has pointed out objection on ground of absence of any agricultural practice and occupancy as on the cut off date

155

Total

429 applications

18. As held by this Honorable Court, it is the duty of Government and its authorities, especially the Forest department, to ensure that the forest land is not misutilized by issuing assignment orders/Pattas to persons who are not eligible for the same and if there is any encroachment on forest land, it is for the concerned officers, to ensure that encroachment is removed at the earliest. The Honourable High Court has further directed the Forest department to verify whether appropriate demarcation can be made to the aforesaid habitat depending upon the ground reality involved in the matter. Hence further survey and demarcation of lands is highly essential before assigning Rights on each application/claim in the case of remaining disputed claims.

19. It is further submitted that urgent steps are to be taken to comply with the procedure under the Forest Rights Act and Rules thereunder to ensure that genuine claims for Record Of Rights are processed and recognized while also ensuring that large tracts of virgin forests are not grabbed by ineligible persons under the cover of the Forest Rights Act and Rules thereunder. The Perennial Rivers and other water bodies may be lost forever, if ever green forest lands are assigned to ineligible persons and persons intending to grab lands. Therefore, only genuine applications for Record Of Rights are entertained and consequently ineligible persons including land encroachers and land grabbers are not allowed to grab invaluable forest lands misusing the provisions of the Forest Rights Act.” 

8. Heard Smt.Daisy A.Philipose, the learned counsel for the petitioner in both writ petitions and Sri.Aravind V. Mathew, the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

9. The Division Bench of this Court, in One Earth One Life v. State of Kerala [judgment dated 14.07.2015 in W.P.(C) No.35501 of 2009], while disposing of the public interest litigation filed by the petitioner against assignment of forest lands illegally under the guise of implementation of the Forest Rights Act and the Rules, directed the State and the Forest Officials to ensure that no land shall be assigned other than in accordance with the provisions of the aforesaid Act and Rules. Paragraphs 8 to 10 of the said judgment read as under:-

“8. There cannot by any dispute regarding the fact that the recognition and vesting of forest rights under the Act to the forest dwelling Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers can only be in respect of forest land. The very concept of the aforesaid statutory provision indicates that forest land can be assigned only with reference to the property in possession of the forest dweller or the tribal, as the case may be. It cannot be extended to any other area of forest. In other words, it is not open for the Government to assign any extent of land to the forest dwellers other than the land in their actual possession. When this legal position is clear, we do not think that the Government will have any right to issue any assignment orders or issue pattas based on the minutes of discussion as stated in Ext.P4.

9. It is for the Government and its authorities especially the Forest Department to ensure that the forest land is not misutilized by issuing assignment orders/pattas to persons who are not eligible for the same. If there is any encroachment on the forest land, it is for the concerned officers to ensure that encroachment is removed at the earliest.

10. Therefore, having regard to the limited scope of the above writ petition, we direct the respondent authorities to ensure that no land shall be assigned other than in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the Rules framed thereunder. It is made clear that para 5 of the minutes of the meeting (Ext.P4) shall not enable any person to claim 1 acre of land from the forest area, other than the land in their possession. The forest department shall also verify whether appropriate demarcation can be made to the aforesaid habitats depending upon the ground reality involved in the matter.”

10. In the counter affidavit filed by the DFO, he has categorically denied the allegation of assigning virgin forest lands to ineligible persons under the guise of implementation of the Forest Rights Act. Details of persons, their hamlet, extent of land for which the Record of Rights were issued have been stated in the counter affidavit. The status of pending applications is also given. It is stated that the applications for Record of Rights were processed by the DFO only after joint verification by Forest and Revenue Departments as prescribed in Rule 12A of Forest Rights Rules and submitted to the District Level Committee for signing and final issuance of Record of Rights. It is also stated that survey and demarcation of lands will be done before assigning Rights on each application/claim in the case of remaining disputed claims. The affidavit states that urgent steps are being taken to comply with the procedure under the Forest Rights Act and Rules thereunder to ensure that genuine claims for Record of Rights are processed and recognized, while also ensuring that large tracts of virgin forests are not grabbed by ineligible persons under the cover of the Forest Rights Act and Rules thereunder.

11. In the light of the counter affidavit filed by the 6 th respondent, we are of the view that these writ petitions can be disposed of with direction to the respondents to strictly comply with the directions in the judgment dated 14.07.2015 in W.P.(C) No.35501 of 2009 and to ensure that no land shall be assigned otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of the Forest Rights Act and the Forest Rights Rules. The District Level Committee shall not grant Record of Forest Right to the scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers without surveying and demarcating the boundaries of land in their actual possession as on 13th day of December, 2005 and without joint verification as per procedure prescribed under Rule 12A of the Forest Rights Rules. The District Level Committee shall also ensure that recognition of rights and issuance of record of rights shall be done only in respect of eligible persons based on the actual extent of land held by the claimant under the Forest Rights Act as on the relevant date, i.e. 13.12.2005.

12. With these directions, the writ petitions are disposed of.

Advocate List
  • DAISY A.PHILIPOSE, JAI GEORGE

  • SRI.ARAVIND V MATHEW- G.P, SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN, SPL. G.P. FOR FOREST 

Bench
  • HON'BLE&nbsp
  • CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S. MANIKUMAR
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
Eq Citations
  • LQ
  • LQ/KerHC/2023/1210
Head Note

1. A record of rights was issued in favor of 740 applicants out of a total of 1169 applications. 2. Out of the remaining applications, 172 applications were pending joint survey, while 155 applications faced objections from the Forest Department. 3. Objections pertained to the absence of agricultural practices or occupancy as of the cutoff date and pendency of litigation. 4. Joint verification of 24 applications was yet to be completed, after which the Forest Rights Record (FRR) could be issued. 5. A total of 225 applications were processed and approved for granting Record of Rights. 6. The remaining 7 applications were rejected for reasons including not meeting the criteria set by the Forest Rights Act. 7. Though not permissible under FRA, a demand for patta was made by one applicant. 8. 7 applications were rejected due to the absence of agricultural activities at the time of inspection. 9. One applicant sought a patta (land record) instead of a Record of Rights under the Forest Rights Act, and hence could not be considered under FRA. 10. Of the 24 applications pending joint verification, details of the extent of land claimed and place of claim are mentioned in the table in para 14 of the judgement. 11. The extent of claimed land for the172 applications pending joint survey, along with the places where the claims were made, are tabulated in para15 of the judgement. 12. Reasons for rejection of 7 applications are stated in para13 of the judgement. 13. Reasons for rejection of 155 applications are stated in para16 of the judgement. 14. Extent of land assigned exclusively to Tribal People belonging to Irula, Muduga, and Kurumba communities is mentioned in para11 of the judgement. 15. A table in para17 of the judgement has details of the extent of land and places where applications are pending due to various objections raised by the Forest Department, based on the initial survey. 16. A table in para18 of the judgement provides details of the extent of land and names of Forest Range Officers to whom applications have been sent for further action.