Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Naseema Begum v. Mehraj-ud-din Kanroo

Naseema Begum v. Mehraj-ud-din Kanroo

(High Court Of Jammu And Kashmir)

COD No. 602/2010 | 30-06-2014

Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, J.Delay of 134 days in preferring the Revision Petition against the order passed by the Court of Munsiff (Judicial Magistrate), Baramulla, dated 18.05.2010, is sought to be condoned. Respondent despite service has not chosen to appear. In the application it is stated that due to turmoil in the Valley, for a considerable period lawyers could not appear, when it came to a little halt, the petitioner (defendant in the suit) from his counsel came to know that the suit has been dismissed in default. The counter claim set up by the petitioner (defendant) was required to be proceeded with, same has not been done which necessitated the filing of revision petition.

2. The ground projected for condoning the delay has remained to be controverted as the respondent has not chosen to appear. It being so, the delay is condoned. Revision petition taken on board. COD, accordingly, disposed of.

C. Rev. No. 139/2010

Appearance as above.

Summon be issued for securing presence of the respondent. Same be sent for execution through District Judge, Baramulla.

Advocate List
  • For Petitioner : A.R. Bhat, Advocates for the Appellant
Bench
  • HON'BLE JUSTICE MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR, J
Eq Citations
  • 2014 (4) JKJ 15
  • 2014 (81) RCR (CIVIL) 14
  • LQ/JKHC/2014/286
Head Note

Limitation Act, 1963 — S. 5 — Delay of 134 days in preferring revision petition against order passed by Court of Munsiff (Judicial Magistrate) — Condonation of