Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Muzebuddeen v. State Of M.p.

Muzebuddeen v. State Of M.p.

(Supreme Court Of India)

Civil Appeal No. 7674 Of 2011 (@Special Leave Petition) No. 7673 Of 2006) With Civil Appeal No. 7675 Of 2011 (@Special Leave Petition) No. 8112 Of 2006) With Civil Appeal No. 7676 Of 2011 (@Special Leave Petition) No. 8113 Of 2006) With Civil Appeal No. 7677 Of 2011 (@Special Leave Petition) No. 8114 Of 2006) With Civil Appeal No. 7678 Of 2011 (@Special Leave Petition) No. 11542 Of 2006) Civil Appeal No. 7679 Of 2011 (@Special Leave Petition) No. 6558 Of 2006) And With Civil Appeal No. 7680 Of 2 | 06-09-2011

1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Delay condoned.

3. Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions.

4. By this common order, we are disposing of these appeals.

5. By the Notification issued under Sections 4 and 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on 17.10.1982, total land admeasuring 134.913 hectares situate in village Babupur, Nipania, Dohi and Khuar, Tahsil Hujur, Rewa was acquired.

5. Out of that, the land of the appellant-Muzebuddeen is measuring 1.376 hectares only in Khasra Nos.472,473,480, and 481, the land of the appellant - Ramkhelaman is measuring 6.119 hectares only(i.e. 2.209 hectares in Village Nipania, 3.319 hectares and 0.591 hectares in Village Babupur) in Khasra Nos.452/2, 453/2, 15 to 19, 24, 25, 27 to 29, 21 and 22 respectively, the land of the appellant - Ram Awatar is measuring 1.123 hectares only in Khasra No. 453/3, the land of the appellant - Mahesh Prasad is measuring 0.313 hectares only in Khasra No.454/4, the land of the appellant - Laxman Prasad is measuring 2.830 hectares only in Khasra Nos.452/1, the land of the appellant - Budhasen is measuring 0.626 hectares only in Khasra No.454/B, 454/C1 and the land of the appellant - Ramawatar is measuring 32 acres only.

6. The Reference Court, by a well reasoned order, awarded compensation of Rs.25,000/- per acre in all the cases. The High Court, in the impugned judgment/order, has reduced the compensation from Rs.25,000/- per acre to Rs.20,000/- without any sound basis. In our opinion, interference by the High Court was totally uncalled for. We see no justification for the High Court in reducing the compensation of the appellants. In this view of the matter, we are constrained to set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court and restore the order of the Reference Court. The appellants would be entitled to a compensation of Rs.25,000/- per acre along with other statutory benefits.

7. We, accordingly, restore the order passed by the Reference Court granting compensation at the rate of Rs.25,000/- per acre plus all the statutory benefits as contemplated under the law.

8. Consequently, we direct the State of Madhya Pradesh to pay the amount calculated at the rate of Rs.25,000/- per acre plus other benefits as contemplated under law to the appellants. The amount already paid to the appellants shall be adjusted and the remaining amount be paid to the appellants within three months from today.

9. These appeals are allowed and disposed of accordingly, leaving the parties to bear their own cost.

Advocate List
  • For the Appellants ----- For the Respondents -----
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK VERMA
Eq Citations
  • AIR 2011 SCW 5983
  • (2011) 14 SCC 271
  • 2013 (6) RCR (CIVIL) 3053
  • LQ/SC/2011/1197
Head Note

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Ss. 18, 23 and 26 — Compensation — Reduction by High Court — Unwarranted — Reference Court awarded compensation of Rs 25,000 per acre in all cases — High Court reduced compensation from Rs 25,000 per acre to Rs 20,000 without any sound basis — Held, interference by High Court was totally uncalled for — No justification for High Court in reducing compensation of appellants — Order of High Court set aside and order of Reference Court restored — Appellants entitled to compensation of Rs 25,000 per acre along with other statutory benefits (Paras 5 and 6)