Ms. Catherine Anderson v. Ashwani Bhatia

Ms. Catherine Anderson v. Ashwani Bhatia

(Supreme Court Of India)

PETITION FOR ARBITRATION (CIVIL) NO.35/2018 | 05-04-2019

INDU MALHOTRA, J.
1. The Petitioner has filed an Appliction under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 in an international commercial arbitration, since the Petitioner is an Australian citizen.
2. Both parties have requested for the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes which have arisen between them emanating from the Partnership Deed dated 10.04.2000 of M/s. Moonpeak Pictures, and Partnership Deed dated 23.03.2005 of M/s Moonpeak Espresso.
3. Both the Partnership Agreements are between the same parties, and have an identical arbitration clause, which reads as under :

“11. That all the disputes and questions in connection with this partnership or this deed and whether during or after the partnership shall be referred to arbitration for which the arbitrator(s) will be appointed with mutual consent of both the partners and that the decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon both the partners, hereto this deed.”
4. We appoint Justice Surinder Thakur (Retd.) Judge of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla as the Sole Arbitrator, subject to the declaration being made under Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with respect to independence and impartiality, and the ability to devote sufficient time to complete the arbitration within the period of 12 months. Upon acceptance, the parties will pay fees to the Arbitrator in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended.
5. The arbitration agreement does not specify the seat/place of arbitration. We direct that the arbitration be conducted at Shimla, as the Seat/Place of arbitration.
6. A copy of this Order be despatched to Justice Surinder Thakur (Retd.) at the following address:
“ Justice Surender Singh Thakur
627, Amit apartments,
The Mall, Solan.
Mob : 09418900061 ”
7. The matter is disposed of accordingly.
8. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed.

Advocate List
Bench
  • HONBLR MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
  • HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA
Eq Citations
  • 2019 (2) RCR (CIVIL) 774
  • (2019) 11 SCC 299
  • LQ/SC/2019/637
Head Note