M.c. Mehta
v.
Union Of India And Others
(Supreme Court Of India)
Suo motu Contempt Petition No. 300 Of 2000 In Interlocutory Application No. 22 And 1206 In Writ Petition (C) No. 4677 Of 1985 | 10-05-2001
By an order passed in April, 1996, this court had directed that no non-conforming industry shall be permitted to carry on its activity after 31 December, 1996. As a result thereof, at least those industries which were operating in residential areas, whose operation did not conform with the provisions of the Master Plan, were required to stop their operation by 31 December, 1996.
Subsequent thereto, orders were passed from time to time with regard to relocation of the non-conforming industries. Ultimately, on 8 September, 1999 - a Division Bench of this court directed that the entire process of relocation of the industries should be completed by 31 December, 1999 and if the industries in the residential area could not be shifted and relocated for any reason whatsoever by 31 December, 1999, then those industries shall be closed down.
Thereafter, various affidavits were filed on behalf of the Union of India, Municipal Corporation of Delhi and NCT, Delhi, which show that there was a continuous breach of orders of this court. Neither industrial estates had been established nor plots allotted to enable relocation nor units working in non-conforming areas including residential area were shut down.
By reason of the non-compliance of the orders of this court on 14 November, 2000, notices were issued to the Chief Secretary, NCT, Delhi and also to the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, to show cause why they should not be punished for contempt for the continued inaction on the part of the NCT, Delhi and for non-compliance of the various orders passed by this court starting from 1996 and including the orders dated 8 September, 1999, 30 August, 2000 and 12 September, 2000, regarding the closing of the polluting units situated in the residential areas.In the affidavit filed by Shri P. S. Bhatnagar, Chief Secretary, Government of NCT, Delhi, it has been stated that he assumed charge on 23 March, 2000, as the Chief Secretary and has been diligently working towards ensuring compliance of the orders of this court. While indicating steps which has been taken with regard to the implementation of the said orders, it has been stated by him that he neither deliberately nor intentionally disobeyed any order, of this court. Nonetheless, he tendered an unqualified apology to this court.
A somewhat similar affidavit has been filed by Shri S. P. Aggarwal, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi. While tendering unqualified apology, he submitted that he did not disobey the orders of this court and has indicated in the said affidavit the steps which had been taken in an effort to comply with the directions issued by this court for relocation of the non-conforming industries from time to time.
We heard the learned counsel for the contemnors and are of the opinion that the NCT, Delhi, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi and the other local authorities have not put in sufficient effort to comply with the orders of relocation and there is clearly serious lapse on their part. There has been a lack of effort and will on the part of the authorities giving us the impression that wealth rather than or at the expense of, health seems to be a greater concern for them.
Orders were passed by this court requiring the executive to implement the law within a time frame. This has become necessary as tolerance of illegality in the non-conforming use of land had increased the pollution to a hazardous level. It was the duty of the chief executive functionaries that executive functioned. Even if there had been no deliberate or willful disregard for the orders passed, there has clearly been a lackadaisical attitude and approach towards them. The welfare of the silent majority of the citizens of Delhi has been put on hold.While we do not propose to take any further action in this matter, but such lethargic attitude, if it continues, may soon become contumacious. With a hope that the orders will be earnestly complied with, we direct the closure of these contempt proceedings and discharge the rule.
Advocates List
For the Appearing Parties K. N. Raval, Advocate.
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. KIRPAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DORAISWAMY RAJU
Eq Citation
(2001) 5 SCC 309
[2001] 3 SCR 709
2001 (4) SCALE 223
LQ/SC/2001/1285
HeadNote
Contempt of Court — Civil Contempt — Failure to comply with court's order — Non-conforming industries operating in residential areas — Supreme Court's order that no non-conforming industry shall be permitted to carry on its activity after 31 December, 1996 — Orders passed from time to time with regard to relocation of non-conforming industries — Division Bench of Supreme Court directing that entire process of relocation of industries should be completed by 31 December, 1999 and if industries in residential area could not be shifted and relocated for any reason whatsoever by 31 December, 1999, then those industries shall be closed down — Neither industrial estates had been established nor plots allotted to enable relocation nor units working in non-conforming areas including residential area were shut down — Chief Secretary, NCT, Delhi and Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, issued notices for contempt — Chief Secretary and Commissioner tendered unqualified apology — Held, NCT, Delhi, Municipal Corporation of Delhi and other local authorities have not put in sufficient effort to comply with orders of relocation and there is clearly serious lapse on their part — There has been a lack of effort and will on part of authorities giving impression that wealth rather than or at expense of, health seems to be a greater concern for them — Even if there had been no deliberate or willful disregard for orders passed, there has clearly been a lackadaisical attitude and approach towards them — Welfare of silent majority of citizens of Delhi has been put on hold — While court does not propose to take any further action in this matter, but such lethargic attitude, if it continues, may soon become contumacious — With a hope that orders will be earnestly complied with, contempt proceedings closed and rule discharged — Constitution of India — Arts. 129 and 142 — Penal Code, 1860, S. 173