Mannava Satyawati And Others
v.
Mannava Malleswara Rao And Others
(Supreme Court Of India)
Civil Appeal No. 892 Of 1988 | 06-01-1994
1. Mannava Satyawati, the appellant is the wife of respondent Mannava Malleswara Rao. The other three appellants are their children. The appellants filed a suit for maintenance against the respondent before the Munsif Magistrate, Guntur. The learned Magistrate by his order dated 11-11-1982 decreed the suit and granted maintenance @ Rs 150 per month to the wife and Rs 75 per month to each of the three children. The respondent challenged the order by way of appeal before the District Judge, Guntur which was allowed and the maintenance awarded by the Magistrate was set aside. The High Court upheld the order of the District Judge
2. This Court while granting special leave passed the following order
"Delay condoned. Special leave granted. Pending notice in regard to interim relief by way of ad interim relief it is ordered that the order passed by the learned District Judge, Guntur as confirmed by the High Court shall stand suspended. In the result the order passed by the learned Munsif Magistrate, Guntur will hold the field and the petitioners will be entitled to recover maintenance in accordance with the said order." *
3. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. We have been taken through the judgments of the Munsif Magistrate and of the District Judge as upheld by the High Court. We are of the view that the District Judge and the High Court fell into patent error in denying the maintenance to the appellants. The High Court fell into patent error in reaching the finding that since the wife and the children left the house on their own they were not entitled to the maintenance. In the facts and circumstances of this case the respondent was bound to maintain his wife and children. We do not agree with the reasoning of the District Judge and that of the High Court. We set aside the judgment of the District Judge and of the Andhra Pradesh High Court and restore that of the Munsif Magistrate, Guntur. We agree with the reasoning and the conclusions reached by the Munsif Magistrate. We allow the appeal with costs. We quantify the costs as Rs 5000.
2. This Court while granting special leave passed the following order
"Delay condoned. Special leave granted. Pending notice in regard to interim relief by way of ad interim relief it is ordered that the order passed by the learned District Judge, Guntur as confirmed by the High Court shall stand suspended. In the result the order passed by the learned Munsif Magistrate, Guntur will hold the field and the petitioners will be entitled to recover maintenance in accordance with the said order." *
3. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. We have been taken through the judgments of the Munsif Magistrate and of the District Judge as upheld by the High Court. We are of the view that the District Judge and the High Court fell into patent error in denying the maintenance to the appellants. The High Court fell into patent error in reaching the finding that since the wife and the children left the house on their own they were not entitled to the maintenance. In the facts and circumstances of this case the respondent was bound to maintain his wife and children. We do not agree with the reasoning of the District Judge and that of the High Court. We set aside the judgment of the District Judge and of the Andhra Pradesh High Court and restore that of the Munsif Magistrate, Guntur. We agree with the reasoning and the conclusions reached by the Munsif Magistrate. We allow the appeal with costs. We quantify the costs as Rs 5000.
Advocates List
For
Petitioner/Plaintiff/Appellant (s) Advocates A R Gole, PAVAN PATIL, PAVAN PATIL
Respondent/Defendant (s)Advocates ADV.SURAJ N.NAIK FOR RES.NO. 9 TO 15, Suraj Naik, Suraj Naik
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH
HON'BLE JUSTICE YOGESHWAR DAYAL
Eq Citation
(1995) SCC CRI 836
(1995) SUPPL. 3 SCC 259
LQ/SC/1994/18
HeadNote
Family and Personal Laws — Maintenance — Entitlement to — Wife and children leaving the house on their own — Effect of — Held, respondent was bound to maintain his wife and children — Wife and children were entitled to maintenance — Munsif Magistrate granting maintenance to wife and children confirmed
Thank you for subscribing! Please check your inbox to opt-in.
Oh no, error happened! Please check the email address and/or try again.