Madura Municipal Council Through Its Chairmanl, R V Ramachari
v.
Veeranna Kone
(High Court Of Judicature At Madras)
No. | 23-08-1912
[1] This case is on all fours with Raman Chetty v. Municipal Council of Kumbakonam 30 M. 290 : M.L.T. 294 with which we agree. We mast, therefore, hold that the contract between the Municipality and the defendant, not being in accordance with the provisions of Section 45 of Act IV of 1884, the suit is not maintainable, and that the defendants enjoyment of the benefit of the contract for three months does not affect the applicability of the section.
[2] The petition is dismissed.
[2] The petition is dismissed.
Advocates List
For The Appearing Parties ---.
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAPH BENSON
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDARA AIYAR
Eq Citation
16 IND. CAS. 890
LQ/MadHC/1912/381
HeadNote
Constitution of India — Arts. 131 and 136 — Writ — Maintainability — Contract between Municipality and defendant, not being in accordance with provisions of S. 45, Indian Contract Act — Suit not maintainable — Petition dismissed
Thank you for subscribing! Please check your inbox to opt-in.
Oh no, error happened! Please check the email address and/or try again.