Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

M. Davidraj v. J. Manohar And Others

M. Davidraj v. J. Manohar And Others

(Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court)

Civil Revision Petition No. 1937 To 1939 Of 2012 & M.P.(Md) No. 4, 4, 4 & 4 Of 2012 | 07-11-2012

(Prayer: C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1937 of 2012 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 27.01.2012, passed in I.A.No.786/2011 in O.S.No.285/2011 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sivakasi.

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1938 of 2012filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 27.01.2012, passed in I.A.No.785 of 2011 in O.S.No.214/2011 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sivakasi.

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1939 of 2012filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to struck off the plaint in O.S.No.214 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sivakasi.)

Common Order

1. The matter has come up before me for the third time. No representation on the side of the petitioner. In fact, these revisions were filed by one Davidraj, a third party, as against the injunction order passed. Instead of approaching the Court which passed the injunction order by making appropriate applications as third party for getting the injunction vacated, the petitioner has chosen to file the present revisions. He is not showing any interest also in prosecuting these revisions.

2. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed. No costs.

Advocate List
  • For the Appearing Parties No Appearance.
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. RAJASURIA
Eq Citations
  • LQ/MadHC/2012/6468
Head Note

Civil Revision Petition — Revision filed by third party — Instead of approaching Court which passed injunction order by making appropriate applications as third party for getting injunction vacated, petitioner chose to file present revisions — Revision dismissed