Lakhan Lal & Others v. State Of Bihar & Others

Lakhan Lal & Others v. State Of Bihar & Others

(Supreme Court Of India)

Writ Petition No. 103 & 199 Of 1967, Civil Appeal No. 1971 Of 1966 & Criminal Appeals No. 164 To 168 Of 1966 | 26-03-1968

Bachawat, J.

1. W. P. No. 199 of 1967, C. A. No. 1971 of 1966 and Cr. As. Nos. 164-168 of 1966 raise common questions as to the validity of the notifications declaring a market area and establishing a market for agricultural produce in Gaya and the legality of the levy of market fees and licence fees herein under the Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1960 (Bihar Act 16 of 1960) and the Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Rules 1962. The contentions are that (1) the notification declaring the market area is void as the notified market area is too wide, (2) the market committee has not established any market and in the absence of a market and a lawful market area, the provisions of the Act and the Rules are not enforceable in the area. (3) the fees are in the nature of taxes and are illegally levied as no services are being rendered by the market committee, and (4) the enforcement of the Act and the Rules in Gaya without implementing them in the whole of Bihar is discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. W. P. No. 199 of 1967 is a writ petition filed in this Court. C. A. No. 1971 of 1966 is an appeal from an order of the Patna High Court dismissing a writ petition filed in that Court. Cr. As. Nos. 164-168 of 1966 are appeals filed against the orders of the Patna High Court refusing to quash criminal prosecutions under Section 48 for refusal to take out licences in contravention of Rule 71.

2. The relevant provisions of the Act and the Rules and the relevant notifications may be noticed briefly. As stated in the preamble, the object of the Act is to provide for the better regulation of buying and selling of agricultural produce and the establishment of markets for it in the State of Bihar and for matter connected therewith. "Agricultural produce" as defined in Section 2 (1) (a) includes all produce mentioned in the schedule to the Act. Section 2, 3, 4 and 5 define and deal with market area, market, market proper and market yards. "Market area" is the entire area within which purchase and sale of agricultural produce is regulated. "Market for the area consists of a market proper, a principal market yard and sub-market yard or yards, if any. "Market proper" is an area inside the market area and within a certain distance from a market yard. "Principal market Yard" and sub-market yard" are enclosures, buildings or localities within the market proper.

3. The State Government may issue a notification under Section 3 declaring its intention of regulating the purchase and sale of specified agricultural produce in any area. After considering the objections and suggestions received by it and after holding necessary enquiries, if any, the State Government may issue a notification under Section 4 (1) declaring the area or any part of it to be the market area in respect of any notified agricultural produce. Section 4 (2) provides that on the issue of such a notification no place can be set up, established or continued except in accordance with the provisions of the Act, rules and bye-laws for the purchase or sale of the agricultural produce other than sales by the growers and retail sales to consumers. The State Government is required by Section 6 to establish a market committee for every market area. Under Rule 61 read with Section 27 the market committee is required to levy and collect market fees on the agricultural produce brought in the market area at the rate of 25 naye paise for Rs. 100 worth of the produce.

4. The relevant provisions relating to the establishment of market may now be read:

"2 (h) market means a market established under this Act for the market area and includes a market proper, a principal market yard and sub-market yard or yards, if any."


S. 5. Declaration of market yards.-

(1) For each market there shall be one principal market yard and there may also be one or more sub-market yard or yards as may be necessary.

(2) The State Government may, by notification, declare-

(i) any enclosure, building or locality in any market area to be the principal market yard and other enclosures, buildings or localities in such area to be one or more sub-market yard or yards for the said market area, and

(ii) any area, including all lands, with buildings therein within such distance of the market yard or yards as it thinks fit, to be market proper.


18. Objects and duties of the Market Committee.-Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the following shall be the objects and duties of the Market Committee-


(i) when so required by the State Government, to establish a market for the market area providing for such facilities as the State Government may, from time to time, direct in connection with the purchase and sale of the agriculture produce concerned;.......


Rule 59. Establishment of market.-

(1) After the issue of the notification under Section 4 and establishment of the market committee under Section 6, the State Government shall direct the market committee to establish a market.

(2) When directed to do so under sub-rule (1), the market committee shall establish a market for the market area for which it is established.

(3) After the establishment of a market by the market committee, the State Government shall issue a notification under section 5."


A market as defined in Section 2 (h) is established for a market area by following the procedure laid down in Section 5, 18 (i) and Rule 58. The State Government issues a direction under Section 18 (i) read with Rule 59 (1) to the market committee to establish a market for the market area. On receipt of this direction the market committee decides under Rule 59 (2) to establish a market by fixing the boundaries of the market proper and the principal market yard and sub-market yard, if any. Thereafter the government issues the necessary notification under Section 5 (2) declaring the market proper and the market yards. These three steps from one integrated process and on the issue of the notification under Section 5 (2) the market is finally established. The market so established consists of the market proper and the market yard or yards. There is no other separate market place. The expression "market" is used in the Act as meaning either the market proper or the market yards or both.Under Section 15 read with Rule 67 as soon as a market is established all notified agricultural produce brought into, produced or processed in the market proper save a prescribed quantity for retail sale or consumption must pass through a market yard and shall not be sold at any other place within the market proper and the price shall be settled by open auction and not otherwise. Thus the business of sale and purchase of the agricultural produce is concentrated in the market yards and takes place at fair prices under regulated conditions in the presence of a large number of buyers and sellers. Under Section 18 (ii) and Rules 71 and 73, as amended by notification No. 4575 issued by the State Government on March 25, 1965 no person can do business as a trader or other operator in the notified agricultural produce in a market except under a licence granted by the market committee on payment of the prescribed licence fees.

5. The procedure prescribed by the Act and the Rules was followed for regulating the purchase and sale of agricultural produce and for establishing a market for it in the Gaya area. On December 13, 1962 the State Government issued the necessary notification under S. .3. On September 19, 1963 it issued a notification under S. 4 (1) declaring Gaya town, Gaya Muffasil, Bodh Gaya and Paraiya Police Station within the Sadar Sub-Division of Gaya District as the market area for the sale and purchase of paddy, rice, masur, linseed, gur and potato. On the same date it established a market committee for the market area. On October 22, 1963 the Government acting under Section 18 (i) and Rule 59 (1) directed the market committee to establish a market. On January 23, 1964 the market committee decided to establish a market under Rule 59 (2) and made its recommendations regarding market proper and the principal market yard. On February 12, 1964 the market committee made its recommendation regarding the sub-market yard The resolution of the committee dated January 23, l964 stated that as directed by the State Government "this committee appoints Gaya bazar to be area of this bazar". This clumsy phrase really means that as directed by the Government the committee was establishing a market for the Gaya market area. The market consisted of the market proper and the market yards. There was no other separate market known as the Gaya bazar. On April 6, 1964 the Government issued a notification under Section 5 (2) (ii) declaring the entire area under the jurisdiction of the Gaya municipality and several villages as the market proper. On April 7, 1964 the Government issued a notification under Section 5 (2) (i) declaring the locality of Maballah Parani Godown within Gaya Police Station to be the principal market yard and the locality known at Kedarnath Market within Ggaya Police Station to be the sub-market yard.

6. Mr. M. C. Chagla Submitted that the area declared to be the market area by the notification on September 19, 1963 is too wide. This objection is not well founded.It may be conceded that the power under Section 4 (1) should be exercised reasonably. But there is no material on the record to show that the Government acted unreasonably or that the market is so wide that the sale and purchase of agricultural produce within it cannot be effectively controlled by the market committee or that the growers within the area cannot conveniently bring their produce to the market yards. The market area was duly declared under Section 4 (1) After considering objections and suggestions made in that behalf.

7. Counsel next submitted that the market committee has not established any market.According to Counsel a market must be a well defined site with market equipment and facilities. The argument overlooks the definition of market in Section 2 (h). The market consists of market proper and the market yards. The market yards are well defined enclosures buildings or localities but the market proper is under S. 2 (k) read with Section 5 (2) (ii) a larger area. For establishing a market it is sufficient to make a declaration under Section 5 (2) fixing the boundaries of the market proper and the market yards on the recommendation of the market committee made under Rule 59 (2) Under Section 18 (i) the market committee must provide for such facilities in the market as the State Government may from time to time direct. It is not shown that the market committee refused to carry out any direction of the Government. The market committee may in view of Ss. 28 (2) and 30 (i) acquire and own lands an buildings for the market but it is not always obliged to do so. The market is established on the issue of a notification under Section 5 (2) declaring the market proper and the market yards.The next contention is that the fees levied by the market committee are in the nature of taxes as the committee does not render any services to the users of the market and the levy of fees is therefore illegal. This contention is not tenable. The market committee has taken steps for the establishment of a market where buyers and sellers meet and sales and purchases of agricultural produce take place at fair prices. Unhealthy market practices are eliminated market charges are defined and improper ones are prohibited. Correct weighment is ensured by employment of licensed weighment and by inspection of scales, weights and measures and weighing and measuring instruments. The market committee has appointed a dispute sub-committee for quick settlement of disputes. It has set up a market intelligence unit for collecting and publishing the daily prices and information regarding the stock arrivals and dispatches of agricultural produce. It has provided a grading unit where the technique of grading agricultural produce is taught. The contract form for purchase and sale is standardised.The provisions of the Act and the Rules are enforced through inspectors alla other staff appointed by the market committee. The fees charged by the market committee are correlated to the expenses incurred by it for rendering these services. The market fee of 25 naye paise per Rs. 100 worth of agricultural produce and the licence fees prescribed by Rr. 71 and 73 are not excessive. The fees collected by the market committee form part of the market committee fund which is set apart and ear-marked for the purposes of the Act. There is sufficient quid pro quo for the levies and they satisfy the test of "fee" as laid down in Commissioner Hindu Religious Endowments Madras v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt, 1954 SCR 1005 [LQ/SC/1954/70] = (AIR 1954 SC 282 [LQ/SC/1954/70] ).

8. It is then said that the setting up of a market in Gaya is discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution as the Act and the Rules have not been implemented in all parts of Bihar. There is no force in this contention. The State Government is not bound to implement the Act and the Rules in all parts of Bihar at the same time. It may establish markets regulating the sale and purchase of agricultural produce in different parts of Bihar gradually and from time to time.

9. In Writ Petition No. 103 of 1967 the relevant notification relating to Barh and the levy of fees by the market committee are challenged on the same grounds. The notification under S. 4 (1) declaring the area within Barh police station to be a market area in respect of the agricultural produce mentioned therein was issued by the State Government on May 26, l965. Thereafter the market for the area was established and notifications declaring the market proper and the market yards were issued after following the procedure laid down in Sections 5 18 (i) and Rule 59. For the reasons already given we find no substance in any of the contentions raised in this petition.

10. In Thakur Prasad Gupta v. State of Bihar AIR 1965 Pat 267 [LQ/PatHC/1964/162] the High Court of Patna upheld the constitutionality of the Act and Rule 61 but it struck down Rule 71 there in force as the rule imposed the liability to take out licenses for operating in the entire market area and was ultra vires Section 18 (ii). This judgment was pronounced on November 20, 1964. Thereafter Rules 71 and 73 were amended by notification No. 4575 dated March 25, 1965 and the word "market" was substituted for the words "market area" therein. The amendment cures the objection that these rules were ultra vires Section 18 (ii). In all the matters before us the constitutionality of the Act and the Rules were again challenged. But when the hearing of these cases commenced, counsel expressly gave up all contentions regarding the invalidity of the Act and the Rules.

11. In the result, C. A. No. 1971 of l966, W. Ps. Nos. 199 and 103 of l967 are dismissed with costs. There will be one hearing fee. Cr. As. Nos. 164-168 of 1966 are dismissed.

12. Appeals dismissed.

Advocate List
Bench
  • HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. HIDDAYATULLAH
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.S. BACHAWAT
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.A. VAIDIALINGAM
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. HEGDE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. GROVER
Eq Citations
  • AIR 1968 SC 1408
  • [1968] 3 SCR 534
  • 1969 (17) BLJR 100
  • LQ/SC/1968/87
Head Note

Weights and Measures and Standards and Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 — S. 2(1) — Market committee — Establishment of market — Steps taken by market committee — Unhealthy market practices eliminated — Market charges defined and improper ones prohibited — Correct weighment ensured by employment of licensed weighment and by inspection of scales, weights and measures and weighing and measuring instruments — Dispute sub-committee appointed for quick settlement of disputes — Market intelligence unit set up for collecting and publishing daily prices and information regarding stock arrivals and dispatches of agricultural produce — Grading unit provided where technique of grading agricultural produce is taught — Contract form for purchase and sale standardised — Provisions of Act and Rules enforced through inspectors and other staff appointed by market committee — Fees charged by market committee correlated to expenses incurred by it for rendering these services — Market fee of 25 naye paise per Rs. 100 worth of agricultural produce and licence fees prescribed by Rr. 71 and 73, Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1960 and Rules not excessive — Fees collected by market committee form part of market committee fund which is set apart and ear-marked for purposes of Act — Sufficient quid pro quo for levies and they satisfy test of “fee” as laid down in Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar, AIR 1954 SC 282 — Setting up of market in Gaya is discriminatory and violative of Art. 14 of Constitution as Act and Rules have not been implemented in all parts of Bihar — Held, State Government is not bound to implement Act and Rules in all parts of Bihar at the same time — It may establish markets regulating sale and purchase of agricultural produce in different parts of Bihar gradually and from time to time — Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1960 — Rr. 59, 61, 71 and 73 — Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Rules, 1961 — Rr. 59, 71 and 73