Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Kaushal Kishor v. State Of Uttar Pradesh & Others

Kaushal Kishor v. State Of Uttar Pradesh & Others

(Supreme Court Of India)

Criminal Misc. Petition No. 14655 Of 2016 In Wp(Crl.) 113 Of 2016 | 08-09-2016

Crl.M.P. No.14655/2016 in W.P.(Crl.) No.113/2016

1. This is an application filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.) for impleadment and modification of the Courts order dated 29th August, 2016.

2. Prayer for impleadment stands allowed.

3. As far as the modification of order is concerned, it relates to order of stay passed on 29th August, 2016, wherein this Court had directed that there shall be stay of further investigation pertaining to F.I.R. No.0838 dated 30th July, 2016. It is submitted by Mr. Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the C.B.I. that in pursuance of the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, the case has been transferred to C.B.I. and the C.B.I. has commenced the investigation from 18th August, 2016.4. Mr. Ankur Gogia, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has no objection if the investigation is carried out by the C.B.I., but the other grievances which have been highlighted in the writ petition and that had been adverted to on the earlier occasion, should remain alive and addressed to. We think that the submission of Mr. Gogia is absolutely justified. The two other grievance, namely, whether the case should be transferred to another State; and whether the respondent No.2 could have spoken in the manner as he has done with regard to the crime in question.

5. In view of the aforesaid submissions raised at the Bar, we modify our order and permit the C.B.I. to continue with the investigation and do the needful in quite promptitude.

6. Crl.M.P. No.14655 of 2016 stands disposed of accordingly.

W.P.(Crl.) No.113 of 20167.

7. Let the writ petition be listed on the date fixed. We had earlier directed the writ petition to be listed on 27th September, 2016.

8. It is submitted by Mr. Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General that as the entire controversy is taken up and adjudicated by this Court, the High Court need not proceed with the matter. Having regard to the said submission, further proceedings in Criminal Writ-Public Interest Litigation No.18005 of 2016, pending before the High Court, shall remain stayed.

Advocate List
  • For the Petitioner F.S. Nariman, Sr. Advocate (A.C.), S.C. Sharma, Advocate (A.C.), Ankur Gogia, Manju Jaitley, AOR. For the Respondents Maninder Singh, ASG, Col. (Retd.) R. Balasubramanian, Prabhas Bajaj, Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR, Akshay Amritanshu, Santosh Kumar, Ravi P. Mehrotra, AOR, Abhinav Kr. Malik, Advocates.
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN
Eq Citations
  • (2017) 1 SCC 407
  • LQ/SC/2016/1184
Head Note

A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 156(3), 173 and 174 — Investigation — Stay of — Modification of stay order — Stay of further investigation directed on 29-8-2016, in W.P.(Crl.) No. 113 of 2016 — In pursuance of order passed by High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, case transferred to CBI and CBI commenced investigation from 18-8-2016 — Petitioner had no objection if investigation is carried out by CBI, but other grievances which have been highlighted in writ petition and that had been adverted to on earlier occasion, should remain alive and addressed to — CBI permitted to continue with investigation and do the needful in quite promptitude — High Court's proceedings, pending before High Court, shall remain stayed — Constitution of India, Art. 136