Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

K. Arun Prasath v. The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Divisional Office, Southern Railway, Madurai

K. Arun Prasath v. The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Divisional Office, Southern Railway, Madurai

(Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court)

Writ Petition No. 6956 Of 2016 & Writ Miscellaneous Petition No. 5954 Of 2016 | 13-04-2016

(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to open the sealed covers in the presence of all bidden and confirm the quotation in their presence and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.)

1. This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking to open the sealed tender covers in the presence of the renderers.

2. Mr.S.Manohar, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents contend that it is not at all a tender and it is only a quotation for the interregnum period before the tenders are called for. Of course, there are four persons participated including the petitioner. It is opened and final result of tender was announced. The petitioner is a last person and the highest bid amount is Rs.84,510/-. Therefore, the quotation has already been granted in favour of the highest bidder, namely, A.Raja.

4. The records have been produced by the respondents and the same has been perused. In view of the same, nothing survives in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. If the petitioner is aggrieved against the grant of order, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the same in the manner known to law. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.

Advocate List
  • For the Petitioner M. Rajeshwari for R. Meenakumari, Advocates. For the Respondents S. Manohar, Standing Counsel.
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. RAJENDRAN
Eq Citations
  • LQ/MadHC/2016/1869
Head Note

Constitution of India — Art. 226 — Prayer for Mandamus to open sealed tender covers in presence of renderers — Held, nothing survives in writ petition — Records produced by respondents perused — Petition dismissed