Jaspreet Singh
v.
State Of Punjab
(High Court Of Punjab And Haryana)
CRM-M-32659-2021 | 07-07-2022
Rajesh Bhardwaj, J
1. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.115 dated 4.11.2018, registered under Sections 363, 366-A, 120-B IPC (Section 376 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 added lateron), at Police Station Banur, District Patiala.
2. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ram Krishan Singh has submitted that the petitioner has been convicted by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mohali, vide its order dated 27.5.2022.
3. In view of the above, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such.
Advocates List
Petitioner/Plaintiff/Appellant (s) Advocates
Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, Advocate for Mr. M.K. Dhot, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Respondent/Defendant (s)Advocates
Mr. Rakeshinder Singh Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Eq Citation
NON-REPORTABLE
LQ/PunjHC/2022/13643
HeadNote
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 439, 376 and 363 — Bail — Conviction of accused — Effect on bail application — Prayer in the present petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No115 dated 4112018 registered under Sections 363 366A 120B IPC Section 376 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act 2012 added lateron at Police Station Banur District Patiala — Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ram Krishan Singh has submitted that the petitioner has been convicted by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge Mohali vide its order dated 2752022 — In view of the above, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such — Constitution of India, Art. 136
Deleting Note..
Are you sure you want to move this note to trash?
