1. Three out of us [Ed. : Ranganath Misra, C.J. and K.N. Singh and M.H. Kania, JJ.] sitting as a bench on September 21, 1990, made an order after hearing parties where we has indicated that the decision to implement three aspects of the recommendations of the Mandal Commission was a political one and ordinarily the court would not interfere with such a decision

2. This is what we had said there "[L]ot of emphasis has been laid on either side on the human factor. It was particularly brought to our notice that subsequent to the order of September 11, 1990, agitation has spread into every nook and corner of the country and public life has been disturbed; human lives have been lost and government property has been damaged and destroyed. While we take notice of it, we are of the view that there is no particular necessity for judicial interference on that sole ground." *

3. Thereafter, we had made an appeal to the entire nation that the matter was being adjudicated by this Court and everybodys rights would be worked out when the matter is heard and nothing shall impede this Court from working out the rights of parties and giving such relief as is ultimately adjudicated to be due

4. This petition on behalf of the Supreme Court Bar Association has been brought up by highlighting incidents which have taken place after that order was made

5. We have heard learned counsel on either side at considerable length. We have also listened to interveners and parties in person

6. The learned Attorney General had told us on the earlier occasion that identification of castes would take about two to three months. It is not in dispute that until such identification is made no further steps for conferring benefits contained in the governments order dated August 13, 1990 can at all be worked out

7. At the request of counsel for all the parties we prepone the hearing of the matters from November 6, 1990 to October 25, 1990. We are of the view that till the end of November there would be no occasion for proceeding with the implementation of the Government Order excepting identification of the castes to be benefited

8. In fact the real implication of the order of September 21, 1990 was that there was nothing going to happen before the matter was heard by this Court. We would, however, reiterate without taking into consideration the submissions with reference to the happenings after September 21 that the identification of the castes shall continue but until the matter is heard and we expect it to be finished before the end of the year - no further steps should be taken. No other steps to implement the order of August 13, 1990 shall be taken

9. The earlier order relating to recruitment of doctors by UPSC is left unaffected as the question of reservation shall not arise until after the written examination

10. We make it clear that we expect that law and order situation shall immediately improve, both parties shall take our appeal seriously and restore peace so that the hearing of the matter can be taken up by this Court in an appropriate atmosphere

11. We reiterate that the legitimate interest the every backward class shall be appropriately protected. We make it further clear that the order made today is only a clarification of the order made on September 21, 1990 bringing out the real purport

12. Learned Attorney General in course of his submissions has clarified that prevailing benefits of reservation for the handicapped have not been affected by the Government Order

13. All the interlocutory applications for intervention filed till today shall be accepted by the Registry

14. List the matters on October 25, 1990

15. The full text of our order shall be immediately released to the press and the government controlled media for the purpose of transmission to the public at large.