In Re
v.
(High Court Of Judicature At Madras)
Original Petition No. 231 Of 1929 | 04-11-1929
[1] Having regard to the amendment of the Act, we consider that this petition is now maintainable in this Court, and order the case to be posted before the learned Judge in Chambers.
[2] The Government Solicitor for the Crown.
[2] The Government Solicitor for the Crown.
Advocates List
For the Petitioner M.A. Thirunarayana Chari with S.T. Krishnamachari, M.A. Srinivasan, Advocates. For the Crown Advocate-General.
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WALLACE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANTHAKRISHNA AIYAR
Eq Citation
(1930) 59 MLJ 17
(1930) ILR 53 MAD 237
AIR 1930 MAD 779
LQ/MadHC/1929/348
HeadNote
Constitution of India — Arts. 136 and 32 — Maintainability — Amendment of Art. 32 — Petition for issue of writ of mandamus to High Court — Held, amendment of Art. 32 has made it possible to maintain such petition in Supreme Court — Hence, petition maintainable — Constitution of India — Art. 32
Thank you for subscribing! Please check your inbox to opt-in.
Oh no, error happened! Please check the email address and/or try again.