Q. What are the equivalent citations for In Re vs ?

The equivalence citation are(1913) ILR 36 MAD 471 ; 22 IND. CAS. 187 ; LQ/MadHC/1911/340 ;

In Re Vs. On 13 December, 1911

Q: Q. What was the bench assigned for the case In Re vs ?

HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDARA AYYAR , HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SPENCER

In Re
v.

(High Court Of Judicature At Madras)

No. | 13-12-1911

[1] The order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate is absolutely illegal. He says "provided that Silam Ramudu s alibi which is supported by the Second Court witness Papanna Narasimham is found on investigation to be true, I sanction the prosecution of Parala Muneyya and Lingam Appayya for the offence of perjury and of Sikkala Papayya for presumably abetting them," No sanction can be granted of a provisional character in case certain conditions are satisfied in the future. It was the duty of the Magistrate before granting sanction to satisfy himself that there was, at the time of the order, a permit facie case against the petitioners here.

[2] We set aside the order.

Advocates List

For the Appearing Parties -------

Bench List

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDARA AYYAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SPENCER

Eq Citation

(1913) ILR 36 MAD 471

22 IND. CAS. 187

LQ/MadHC/1911/340

HeadNote

Criminal Procedure, 1973 — S. 195(1) — Sanction for prosecution — Conditional sanction — Held, sanction cannot be granted of a provisional character in case certain conditions are satisfied in the future — It was the duty of the Magistrate before granting sanction to satisfy himself that there was, at the time of the order, a prima facie case against the petitioners — Penal Code, 1860, Ss. 193 and 109