In Re:
v.
Mahadev Gangadhar Deshpande
(High Court Of Judicature At Bombay)
Appeal No. 154 of 1903 | 21-01-1904
1. This is an application for the grant of a succession certificate under Act VII of 1889 and the petitioner purports to be a minor widow acting through her father and guardian, Mahadev Gangadhar Deshpande.
2. An order has been made purporting to appoint the father a guardian of the person and property of his minor daughter under Act VIII of 1890 (Guardian and Wards' Act). The present application should, we think, be amended so as to make the guardian the petitioner, because it is at least open to doubt reading the Succession Certificate Act as a whole whether a grant should be made to a minor.
3. Treating the amendment then as made, and the petition as one presented by a legal guardian of the minor, can we grant a certificate under the Succession Certificate Act
4. The District Judge has decided this in the negative, relying on Gulabchand Gamnaji v. Moti Chatraji (1900) 25 Bom. 523.
5. The head-note in that case goes beyond the actual decision, for the Court was not in the circumstances called on to determine, nor did it in fact determine, that a legal guardian is not entitled to a succession certificate under the Succession Certificate Act.
6. No doubt clause (d) of section 6 requires that the application should set forth the right under which the petitioner claims, and on that the comment was made in Gulabchand's case that it only permits the petitioner who claims the right for himself, to apply. But a legal guardian has, under section 27 of the Guardian and Wards' Act, the obligation cast upon him of dealing with the property of a ward as carefully as a man of ordinary prudence would deal with his own, and subject to the provisions mentioned in chapter 3 of the Act, he may do all acts which are reasonable and proper for the realization, protection or benefit of the property. That appears to us to vest in the guardian power to receive from any debtor the sum due by him to his ward and to give a receipt for the same. This constitutes the right under which he claims within the meaning of clause (d) of section 6 of the Act.
7. Therefore on the completion of the amendment we have directed, an order will be drawn up for a grant to the guardian of a succession certificate on proper security being furnished to the satisfaction of the District Court. For the reasons we have given we must reverse the decree of the District Judge who only came to the conclusion he did, because he reasonably treated himself as bound by authority.
Advocates List
None.
Petitioner/Plaintiff/Appellant (s) Advocates
Respondent/Defendant (s)Advocates
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE JUSTICE JENKINS
HON'BLE JUSTICE H. BATTY
Eq Citation
ILR 1904 28 BOM 344
LQ/BomHC/1904/6
HeadNote
Succession, Inheritance and Gift — Succession Certificate Act, 1889 — Ss. 6(d) and 3 — Guardian of minor widow — Whether entitled to succession certificate — Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, S. 27 — Guardian entitled to receive and give receipt for debts due to minor