Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

In Re: v. Devendra Kumar Rambhai Patel

In Re: v. Devendra Kumar Rambhai Patel

(Authority For Advance Rulings (gst) Gujarat)

ADVANCE RULING NO. GUJ/GAAR/R/2023/21 | 12-06-2023

1. M/s. Devendrakumar Rambhai Patel, Milkat No. 1276, Maneklal Shanabhai Parmar, Timba, Anand, Gujarat 388 170 [for short-.appticant'] is registered under GST and their GSTIN is 24BVAPP6398C1ZH.

2. The applicant is engaged in the business of wholesale/retail trading of unprocessed tobacco which they purchase directly from the farmers. Shri Devendrakumar Rambhai Patel, is the proprietor & carries out his business with his own name as their trade name.

3. The applicant, now wishes to undertake supply ofthe product known as 'Kandi Ravo', which is a tobacco waste. The manufacturing process is mentioned in detail,which is reproduced below for ease of reference viz

4. Additionally, the applicant states that their product falls under the category of 'unmanufactured tobacco without lime tube; that they will not be selling any tube of lime inside the pouches; that though the waste tobacco is mixed with natural clay and water, the nature of the product is not altered & even the consumer base remains the same ie tobacco manufacturers; that it is never used in pan masala and is never put in a paan [also called betel quicl, (source Britannica)]; that it is different from chewing tobacco and zarda scented tobacco; that as per their understanding GST compensation cess is also not leviable on the product. The applicant has further informed that it is sold in 30-35 kg bags & its price range is also not similar to that of chewing/scented tobacco.

5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant has sought a ruling on the following question viz 

1. Whatwill be the classification ofthe goods'Kandi Ravo'.

6. Additional Commissioner(Technical), Central Goods & Service Tax, Vadodara-I Commissionerate, vide his letter no. lV/l6-22lTech/AR/M/s. D R Patell22-23 dated 17.3.23, offered the following comments viz

  • that the activity/service in respect of which Advance Ruling is sought is an ongoing activity;
  • that no such cases are pending before any appellate authority;
  • that the goods may be covered under HSN code 24012090.

7. Personal hearing in the matter was held on 23.3.2023, wherein Shri Devendra R Patel, Shri Hiral C Patel, CA, Shd Bhavik Prajapati, CA, Shri A.R.Patel appeared on behalf of the appellant. On being asked the authorized representative stated that the product was used by tobacco manufacturers and that as per their belief no compensation cess, is payable on to their product.

Discussion and findings

8. At the outset, we would like to state that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the GGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the GGST Act.

9. We have considered the submissions made by the Applicant in their application for advance ruling as well as the submissions made during the course of personal hearing and the departmental comments received in the matter. We have also considered the issue involved, the relevant facts & the applicant's submission/interpretation of law in respect of question on which the advance ruling is sought.

10. Under the GST regime, classification of goods is done using the General Rules of Interpretation of the first schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, including the section & chapter notes and the General Explanatory Notes to the HSN of the first schedule of CTA, 1975 in terms of Explanation 1 to notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate), which reads as under:

(iii) "Tariff item", "sub-heading" "heading" and "Chapter" shall mean respectively a tarill item, sub-heading, heading and chupter as specified in the First Schedule to the Customs Tarif Act, 1975 (51 of 1975).

(iv) The rules for the interpretation of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), including the Section under chapter Notes and the General Explanatory Notes of the First Schedule shall, so far as may be, apply to the interpretotion of this notification

11. Before moving on to decide the issue, it would be prudent to reproduce the relevant notification, chapter notes, HSN notes, etc., viz

(A) [Notification No. 1/ 2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017]

Rate of Tax (Schedules ) for specified eoods under CGST- Schedules I to VI

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (l) of section 9 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), The Central Government, on the recommendations of' the Council, hereby notifies the rate of the central tax of -

i. 2.5 per cent. in respect of goods specified in Schedule I,

ii. 6 per cent. in respect of goods specified in Schedule II,

iii. 9 per cent. in respect of goods specified in Schedule III,

iv. )1per cent. in respect of goods specified in Schedule IV,

v. 1.5 per cent. in respect oJ goods specified in Schedule V, and

vi. 0. 125 per cent. in respect of goods specified in Schedule VI

oppended to this notifcation (hereinafter referred to os lhe said Schedules), that shqll be levied on intra-State supplies o.f goods, the descriptbn o.f which is specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) of the said Schedules, falling under the tariff item, subheuding, heading or Chapter, as the case may be, as specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) ofthe said Schedules.

Schedule IV - 14%

(B)

Notification No. l/2017-Comnensation Cess (Rate). dated 28-6-2017

Rates of Compensation Cess for soecified goods

heading, heading or Chapter, as the case may be as specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the said Schedule.

SCHEDULE

(3) For the purposes of this notification. the phrase "brand name" means brand name or trade name, whether registered or not. that is to say, a name or a mark, such as symbol, monogram, label, signature or invented word or writing which is used in relation to such specified goods for the purpose of indicating, or so as to indicate a connection in the course of trade between such specified goods and some person using such name or mark with or without any indication of the identity ofthat person.

Notification No. 21 2023-Comotnsation Cess (Rate)

In the said notification.

I. in the Schedule, -

(iv) agqinst S. No. 7..fitr the entry in column (1), the entry "0.32R per unit" shall be substituted:

Il. In the Explanation. after cluuse(3)../bllowing clouse shall be inserted, namely: -

"(4) For the purposes of this notification, " R" appearing in column (1) means "relail sale price" as provided in the Schedule to the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 (15 of 2017)":

THE FINANCE ACT,2023

No. 8 of 2023 [31st March,2023]

Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to states) Act

163. ln the Schedule to the Goods and Scryices Tax (Compensation to States) Act. 2017.

(c) The following Explanation shull be inserted at the end, namely:-

'Explanation.-For the purposes of this Schedule,

(i) "retail sale price" means the maximum price at which the concerned goods in packaged form may be sold to the ultimute consumer and includes all taxes, local or otherwise, freight, transport charges commission payble to dealers, and all charges towards advertisement, delivery, packing, forwarding and the like and the price is the sole consideration for such sale

price excluding any taxes, local or otherwise, the retail sale price shall be conslrued accordingly:

(ii) where on the package of any concerned goods more than one retdil sale price is declared, the maximum of such retail sale price shall be deemed to be the retail sale price:

(iii) where the retail sole price, declared on the package of any concerned goods at the time of its clearance from the place of manufacture, is altered to increase the retail sale price, such ahered retail sale price shall be deemed to be the retail sale price:

(iv) where dilferent retil sale prices are declared on different packages.for the sale of any concerned goocls in pockuged.form in different areas, each such retail sale price shall be the retail sale prices for the purposes of determination of the sale of cess for the said goods intended to be sold in the area to which the retail sale price relates.'.

(C) 

2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-

(D)

HSN notes of chapter 24 [relevant extracts]

12. The applicant has, as is evident, sought a ruling on classification of his supply i.e. 'kandi ravo'. The process undertaken by the applicant in respect of the said supply is mentioned in detailed in the paragraph above & hence is not being repeated. However, the process can be briefly summed up as follows viz

the applicant procures unprocessed tobacco from the farmer; the tobacco waste obtained thereafter is crushed. This crushed tobacco waste is thereafter mixed with natural clay and water. This mixture is thereafter dried & packed. It is subsequently supplied to tobacco manufacturesin 30-35 kg packs.

13. The applicants contention is that this process undertaken by them on the tobacco waste does not amount to manufacture as defined under Section 2(72) ot the CGST Act,2Ol7. The CGST Act,2017, defines manufacture as processing of raw material/ inputs in any manner which results in emergence of a new product havins a distinct name character and use.

14. The applicant has further contended that their product, is unfit for consumption; that they do not sell their product with lime tube; that the mixing does not alter the nature of the product & the consumer base remains the same; that it not used with pan-masala, nor is it put in paan; that this is not a product like chewing tobacco with or without lime tube.

15. Chapter 24, tariff item 2401, which deals with unmanufactured tobacco, is reproduced below for ease of reference:

16. We find that HSN notes for tariff item 2401, reproduced supra, covers unmanufactured tobacco in the form of whole plants/leaves in natural state, cured or fermented leaves, whole, stemmed/stripped, trimmed/semi trimmed broken/cut, blended cased with a liquid of appropriate composition mainly prevent drying and to preserve the flavour. It also covers tobacco refuse eg waste resulting from the manipulation of tobacco leaves, or from the manufacture of tobacco products [stalks, stems, midribs, trimmings, dust, etc). Though the applicant has undertaken the process of crushing tobacco refuse and thereafter mixing it with natural clay & water, in terms of the HSN notes, we find that it still remains an unmanufactured tobacco. This is more so because even in terms of section 2(72) of the CCST Act, 2017,, which defines manufacture slnce no new product emerges post the crushing of tobacco refuse & mixing it with natural clay & water, we find it appropriate that the product is classifiable under CTH 2401 as 'unmanufactured tobacco; tobacco refuse'. We further hold that the supply of applicant of 'kandi rayo' is classifiable under 24013000.

17. Moving on to the contention of the applicant that no compensation cess is applicable, we find that the applicant has not disclosed the fact that as to whether they are using brand name for their product. The applicant was asked to provide additional submissions on the issue. The applicant, vide his additional submission received on 10.5.2023, has informed the they are not affixing any name or label on the packing, in which the packed goods are sold to their customers in 30-35 kgs bags. To substantiate the submission, the applicant has also provided the photograph viz 

RULING

18. In the light of the foregoing, we rule as under:

o The supply of applicant of 'kandi ravo' is classifiable under 24013000. The applicant is liable to pay GST at 28% [14 % CGST and 14 % SGST in terms of notification No. 1/2017-CT(Rate), Sr. No. 13 of Schedule IV subject to the condition that goods are cleared without brand name.

Advocate List
  • Shri Devendra R Patel, Shri Hiral C Patel, CA Shri Bhavik Prajapati, CA Shri A.R.Patel.

Bench
  • MILIND KAVATKAR (MEMBER SGST)
  • AMIT KUMAR MISHRA (MEMBER CGST)
Eq Citations
  • (2023) 100 GST 540 (AAR)
  • 2023 [79] G.S.T.L. 280
  • LQ/AAR(GST)/2023/90
Head Note

Central Goods and Services Tax — Advance Ruling — Classification of goods — Nature of product manufactured by the applicant — ‘Kandi Ravo’, sold by the applicant, held, classifiable under CTH 2401 as ‘unmanufactured tobacco; tobacco refuse’ — Held, the supply of applicant of ‘kandi ravo’ is classifiable under 24013000 — Applicant is liable to pay GST at 28% [14% CGST and 14% SGST] — Compensation cess is not leviable on the supply of ‘kandi ravo’ — Central Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017, Sch. — Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Sch. 1, Ch. 24, Entry 2401, HSN Notes — Finance Act, 2023, Sch. — Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017, Sch. — Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Ss. 2(72) and 9 — Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate), Sr. No. 13 of Sch. IV — Notification No. 1/2017-Comnensation Cess (Rate), Sch.