In Re S.s. Pattabi Rama Iyer
v.
(High Court Of Judicature At Madras)
Criminal Revision No. 1048 Of 1940 & Criminal Revision No. 997 Of 1940 | 06-02-1941
The petitioner appears to have admitted the offence under a misapprehension and his request for a re-trial cannot be resisted. The conviction is therefore set aside and there will be a re-trial in accordance with law.
Advocates List
For the Petitioner S.S. Ramachandra Iyer, Advocate. For the Crown V.L. Ethiraj, The Public Prosecutor.
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LAKSHMANA RAO
Eq Citation
AIR 1941 MAD 675
LQ/MadHC/1941/46
HeadNote
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — S. 20 — Re-trial — Admission of offence under a misapprehension — Held, petitioner appears to have admitted the offence under a misapprehension and his request for a re-trial cannot be resisted — Conviction set aside and re-trial directed
Thank you for subscribing! Please check your inbox to opt-in.
Oh no, error happened! Please check the email address and/or try again.