In Re: Cognizance For Extension Of Limitation
v.
(Supreme Court Of India)
Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No.3 of 2020 | 08-03-2021
1. Due to the onset of COVID-19 pandemic, this Court took suo motu cognizance of the situation arising from difficulties that might be faced by the litigants across the country in filing petitions/applications/suits/appeals/all other proceedings within the period of limitation prescribed under the general law of limitation or under any special laws (both Central or State). By an order dated 27.03.2020 this Court extended the period of limitation prescribed under the general law or special laws whether compoundable or not with effect from 15.03.2020 till further orders. The order dated 15.03.2020 was extended from time to time. Though, we have not seen the end of the pandemic, there is considerable improvement. The lockdown has been lifted and the country is returning to normalcy. Almost all the Courts and Tribunals are functioning either physically or by virtual mode. We are of the opinion that the order dated 15.03.2020 has served its purpose and in view of the changing scenario relating to the pandemic, the extension of limitation should come to an end.
2. We have considered the suggestions of the learned Attorney General for India regarding the future course of action. We deem it appropriate to issue the following directions: -
"1. In computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal, application or proceeding, the period from 15.03.2020 till 14.03.2021 shall stand excluded. Consequently, the balance period of limitation remaining as on 15.03.2020, if any, shall become available with effect from 15.03.2021.
2. In cases where the limitation would have expired during the period between 15.03.2020 till 14.03.2021, notwithstanding the actual balance period of limitation remaining, all persons shall have a limitation period of 90 days from 15.03.2021. In the event the actual balance period of limitation remaining, with effect from 15.03.2021, is greater than 90 days, that longer period shall apply.
3. The period from 15.03.2020 till 14.03.2021 shall also stand excluded in computing the periods prescribed under Sections 23 (4) and 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and provisos (b) and (c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can condone delay) and termination of proceedings.
4. The Government of India shall amend the guidelines for containment zones, to state.
“Regulated movement will be allowed for medical emergencies, provision of essential goods and services, and other necessary functions, such as, time bound applications, including for legal purposes, and educational and job-related requirements.”
3. The Suo Motu Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
Advocates List
Counsel for the parties: By Courts Motion Mr. K K Venugopal, AG Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv Mr. B.V. Balram Das, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. A. Lakshminarayanan, AOR Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, AOR Mr. Sidharth Luthra Sr. Adv. Mr. Varun K Chopra, Adv. Mr. Arshdeep Singh Khurana, Adv. Mr. Akshat Gupta, Adv. Mr.Gurtejpal Singh, Adv Mr.Rajshree Sharma, Adv. M/s. VKC LAW OFFICES, AOR Mr. Apoorv Kurup, AOR Ms. Nidhi Mittal,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Ms. Suchita Dixit,Adv. Mr.Anilendra Pandey, AOR Mr. Madhusudan,Adv. Mr. Sandeep,Adv. Mr. Ashwani Kumar,Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari, AOR Ms. Riddhi Sancheti, AOR Mr. Ramesh Babu M. R., AOR Mr.Saurabh Mishra,AAG Mr. Arjun Garg, AOR Ms. Shrutika Garg,Adv. Ms. Garima Prashad, AOR Ms. Archana Sahadeva, AOR Ms. Binu Tamta, AOR Mr. Krishnanand Pandeya, AOR Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. P. H. Parekh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sameer Parekh, Adv. Mr. Kshatrashal Raj, Adv. Ms. Tanya Chaudhry, Adv. Ms. Pratyusha Priyadarshini, Adv. Ms. Nitika Pandey, Adv. M/S. Parekh & Co., AOR Sh. Soumya Chakraborty,Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjai Kumar Pathak, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Tripathi,Adv. Ms. Shashi Pathak,Adv. Mr. S. Thananjayan, AOR Mr. Mayank Kshirsagar, AOR Mr. Apoorv Shukla, AOR Ms. Aruna Mathur,AOR Mr. Avneesh Arputham,Adv. M/S. Arputham Aruna And Co, AOR Mr. Divyakant Lahoti, AoR Mr. Parikshit Ahuja, Adv. Ms. Praveena Bisht, Adv. Ms. Vindhya Mehra, Adv. Ms. Madhur Jhavar, Adv Mr. Kartik Lahoti, Adv. Mr. Rahul Maheshwari,Adv. Ms. Shivangi Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Jaigopal Saboo, Adv Mr. Mukul Kumar, AOR Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR Ms. Anannya Ghosh, AOR Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, AOR Mr. Vivek Narayan Sharma, AOR Mr. Pranaya Goyal, AOR Mr. Nikhil Ranjan,Adv. Mr. Utkarsh Kulvi,Adv. Mr. Pranav Saigal,Adv. Ms. Radhika Gautam, AOR Mr. Sarvam Ritam Khare, AOR
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE MR. CHIEF JUSTICE S. A. BOBDE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Eq Citation
LQ/SC/2021/173
(2021) 5 SCC 452
2021 (2) SCJ 443
(2021) 202 PLR 182
(2021) 202 PLR 182
2022 (1) BomCR 618
HeadNote
Limitation — Extension of limitation — COVID-19 Pandemic — Suo Motu Writ Petition — Directions issued — Suo Motu Writ Petition disposed of accordingly