Hansa
v.
State Of Punjab
(Supreme Court Of India)
Criminal Appeal No. 100 Of 1977 | 22-07-1977
UNTWALIA, J.
1. Hansa, the sole appellant in this appeal by special leave, special leave having been granted only on the question of sentence, was convicted by the trial Judge under Section 325 of the Penal Code for having voluntarily caused grievous hurt with a stick to Mst. Rao. He was also convicted under Section 323 of the Penal Code for having voluntarily caused hurt to PW 3 Melu Ram. On Appeal the High Court set aside his conviction under Section 323, but maintained that under Section 325. The sentence under Section 325 was one years rigorous imprisonment.
2. The occurrence took place as a result of sudden quarrel between some children and others of the family of Hansa and Mst. Rao in regard to throwing of some bricks of brick-bats. In the course of this sudden occurrence Hansa is stated to have accused the injury on the head of Mst. Rao. Learned for the appellant has pressed for our consideration the application of provisions of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 to his case. We are inclined to accept this stand taken on behalf of the appellant as justifiable and tenable in law on the special facts of this case. The appellant was found guilty of having committed the offence of causing grievous hurt punishable under Section 325 of the Penal Code. The maximum sentence provided therein is seven years.
3. Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the nature of the offences also the character of the offender, we think it expedient to release the appellant on probation of good conduct for a period of one year from today. His sentence of imprisonment shall remain suspended during this period. He is already on bail and shall continue to be so, provided he executes a bond to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge, Hoshiarpur, the trial Court, within two weeks from today with or without sureties as that court may direct, to appear and receive sentence when called upon during the said period of one year. In the meantime, the appellant must keep peace and be of good behaviour. The sentence of imprisonment shall stand remitted if he does so.
4. The appeal is accordingly disposed of in the manner indicated above.
1. Hansa, the sole appellant in this appeal by special leave, special leave having been granted only on the question of sentence, was convicted by the trial Judge under Section 325 of the Penal Code for having voluntarily caused grievous hurt with a stick to Mst. Rao. He was also convicted under Section 323 of the Penal Code for having voluntarily caused hurt to PW 3 Melu Ram. On Appeal the High Court set aside his conviction under Section 323, but maintained that under Section 325. The sentence under Section 325 was one years rigorous imprisonment.
2. The occurrence took place as a result of sudden quarrel between some children and others of the family of Hansa and Mst. Rao in regard to throwing of some bricks of brick-bats. In the course of this sudden occurrence Hansa is stated to have accused the injury on the head of Mst. Rao. Learned for the appellant has pressed for our consideration the application of provisions of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 to his case. We are inclined to accept this stand taken on behalf of the appellant as justifiable and tenable in law on the special facts of this case. The appellant was found guilty of having committed the offence of causing grievous hurt punishable under Section 325 of the Penal Code. The maximum sentence provided therein is seven years.
3. Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the nature of the offences also the character of the offender, we think it expedient to release the appellant on probation of good conduct for a period of one year from today. His sentence of imprisonment shall remain suspended during this period. He is already on bail and shall continue to be so, provided he executes a bond to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge, Hoshiarpur, the trial Court, within two weeks from today with or without sureties as that court may direct, to appear and receive sentence when called upon during the said period of one year. In the meantime, the appellant must keep peace and be of good behaviour. The sentence of imprisonment shall stand remitted if he does so.
4. The appeal is accordingly disposed of in the manner indicated above.
Advocates List
For
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE JUSTICE N. L. UNTWALIA
HON'BLE JUSTICE SYED M. FAZAL ALI
Eq Citation
1977 CRILJ 1601
(1977) 3 SCC 575
AIR 1977 SC 1991
LQ/SC/1977/219
HeadNote
Criminal Law — Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, S. 4 — Appellant held guilty of causing grievous hurt — Maximum sentence provided in S. 325 of the Penal Code is 7 yrs — Sentence of one yr RI suspended for a probationary period of one yr — Appellant directed to execute bond and keep peace and be of good behaviour — Penal Code, 1860, S. 325
Thank you for subscribing! Please check your inbox to opt-in.
Oh no, error happened! Please check the email address and/or try again.