Gkn Driveshafts (india) Ltd
v.
Income Tax Officer
(Supreme Court Of India)
Civil Appeal No. 7731 Of 2002 (With C.A. No. 7732, 7733-34, 7735, 7736 & 7737 Of 2002) | 25-11-2002
SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Leave is granted.
3. By the order under challenge, a Division Bench of the High Court at Delhi dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the validity of notices issued under Sections 148 and 143 (2) of the Income Tax Act. 1961. The High Court took the view that the appellant could have taken all the objections in its reply to the notices and that, at that stage, the writ petition was premature. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed on 31st January, 2001. Aggrieved by that order, the appellant is in appeal before us.
4. Mr. M.L. Verma, leaned senior counsel appearing for the appellant, submits that the impugned notices relate to seven assessment years; that during the pendency of these appeals, in respect of two assessment years, viz., 1995-96 and 1006-97, assessment has been completed against which appeals have been filed. Notices relating to the other five assessment years, viz., 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95, 1997-98 and 1998-99, are now the subject-matter of these appeals.
5. We see no justifiable reason to interfere with the order under challenge. However, we clarify that when a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is issued, the proper course of action for the notices is to file return and if he so desires, to seek reasons for issuing notices. The assessing officer is bound to furnish reasons within a reasonable time. On receipt of reasons, the notice is entitled to file objections to issuance of notice and the assessing officer is bound to dispose of the same by passing a speaking order. In the instant case, as the reasons have been disclosed in these proceedings, the assessing officer has to dispose of the objections, if filed, by passing a speaking order, before proceeding with the assessment in respect of the abovesaid five assessment years.
6. Insofar as the appeals filed against the order of assessment before the Commissioner (Appeals), we direct the appellate authority to dispose of the same, expeditiously.
7. With the above observations, the civil appeals are dismissed.
8. No costs.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Leave is granted.
3. By the order under challenge, a Division Bench of the High Court at Delhi dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the validity of notices issued under Sections 148 and 143 (2) of the Income Tax Act. 1961. The High Court took the view that the appellant could have taken all the objections in its reply to the notices and that, at that stage, the writ petition was premature. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed on 31st January, 2001. Aggrieved by that order, the appellant is in appeal before us.
4. Mr. M.L. Verma, leaned senior counsel appearing for the appellant, submits that the impugned notices relate to seven assessment years; that during the pendency of these appeals, in respect of two assessment years, viz., 1995-96 and 1006-97, assessment has been completed against which appeals have been filed. Notices relating to the other five assessment years, viz., 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95, 1997-98 and 1998-99, are now the subject-matter of these appeals.
5. We see no justifiable reason to interfere with the order under challenge. However, we clarify that when a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is issued, the proper course of action for the notices is to file return and if he so desires, to seek reasons for issuing notices. The assessing officer is bound to furnish reasons within a reasonable time. On receipt of reasons, the notice is entitled to file objections to issuance of notice and the assessing officer is bound to dispose of the same by passing a speaking order. In the instant case, as the reasons have been disclosed in these proceedings, the assessing officer has to dispose of the objections, if filed, by passing a speaking order, before proceeding with the assessment in respect of the abovesaid five assessment years.
6. Insofar as the appeals filed against the order of assessment before the Commissioner (Appeals), we direct the appellate authority to dispose of the same, expeditiously.
7. With the above observations, the civil appeals are dismissed.
8. No costs.
Advocates List
For the Appellant M.L. Verma, Sr. Advocate, Jagdish Kumar Chawla, V.P. Gupta, R.K. Jain, Advocates. For the Respondents Ranbir Chandra, Ms. Neera Gupta, Rajiv Tyagi, B.V. Balaram Das, Advocates.
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARIJIT PASAYAT
Eq Citation
(2003) 1 SCC 72
[2002] 125 TAXMAN 963 (SC)
(2003) 179 CTR SC 11
[2003] 259 ITR 19 (SC)
JT 2002 (9) SC 574
2002 (8) SCALE 602
LQ/SC/2002/1239
HeadNote
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Ss. 148 and 143(2) — Notice under S. 148 — Proper course of action for assessee — On receipt of reasons, entitled to file objections to issuance of notice and assessing officer bound to dispose of the same by passing a speaking order — Non-compliance — Directions
Thank you for subscribing! Please check your inbox to opt-in.
Oh no, error happened! Please check the email address and/or try again.