Firm Of Senaji Kapurchand And Ors
v.
Firm Of Pennaji Devichand
(Privy Council)
| 18-07-1930
Thankerton, J.
1. Their Lordships need not call upon the respondents Counsel.
2. They agree with the judgment of the Court below, and with the reasons given by that Court; accordingly, their Lordships will humbly advise His Majesty that the appeal should be dismissed with costs.
1. Their Lordships need not call upon the respondents Counsel.
2. They agree with the judgment of the Court below, and with the reasons given by that Court; accordingly, their Lordships will humbly advise His Majesty that the appeal should be dismissed with costs.
Advocates List
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
THANKERTON
LANCELOT SANDERSON
GEORGE LOWNDES
JJ.
Eq Citation
AIR 1930 PC 300
LQ/PC/1930/80
(1930) 59 MLJ 435
1930 (32) BOMLR 1607
1931 MWN 72
34 CWN 1107
AIR 1930 PC 300
HeadNote
1. Constitution of India — Art. 136 — Appeal — Concurrence with judgment of High Court — Held, appeal dismissed with costs — High Court's judgment agreed with — Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, S. 340-A
Thank you for subscribing! Please check your inbox to opt-in.
Oh no, error happened! Please check the email address and/or try again.