Are you looking for a legal research tool ?
Get Started
Do check other products like LIBIL, a legal due diligence tool to get a litigation check report and Case Management tool to monitor and collaborate on cases.

Dildar Singh v. Union Territory Of Chandigarh

Dildar Singh v. Union Territory Of Chandigarh

(High Court Of Punjab And Haryana)

Criminal Miscelleanous No. 5796 of 2006 | 15-02-2006

( 1 ) COUNSEL for the State says that custody of the petitioner is not required for investigation.

( 2 ) IN view of the above statement, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, if custody of the petitioner is required in future, a notice of two weeks in advance will be given.

Advocate List
  • MEENAKSHI DOGRA, R.S.RAI, Veneet Sharma, Advocates.
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Eq Citations
  • LQ/PunjHC/2006/407
Head Note

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 41-A, 41-B and 41-C — Custody of accused — Petitioner's custody not required for investigation — Petition dismissed as infructuous — However, if custody of petitioner required in future, notice of two weeks in advance to be given