Coromandel Fertilisers Ltd
v.
S The Commercial Tax Officer (ofa), Punjagutta Division, Hyderabad
(High Court Of Telangana)
Writ Petition No. 10275 Of 1989 | 12-03-1991
Advocates List
For the Appearing Parties K.Rajiv Reddy, S.Das Gupta, Advocates.
For Petitioner
- Shekhar Naphade
- Mahesh Agrawal
- Tarun Dua
For Respondent
- S. Vani
- B. Sunita Rao
- Sushil Kumar Pathak
Bench List
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESHWAR DAYAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UPENDRALAL WAGHRAY
Eq Citation
[1992] 85 STC 552 (AP)
LQ/TelHC/1991/83
HeadNote
A.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1957 — Ss. 2(10) and 2(11) — Distinction between "sale price" and "turnover" — Held, for the purpose of resolving the controversy in this case the distinction in the definition of "turnover" under the A.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1957, does not make any difference — Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, Ss. 2(h) and 2(j) — Distinction between "sale price" and "turnover" — "sale price" means the amount payable to a dealer as consideration for the sale of any goods, less any sum allowed as cash discount according to the practice normally prevailing in the trade, but inclusive of any sum charged for anything done by the dealer in respect of the goods at the time of or before the delivery thereof other than the cost of freight or delivery or the cost of installation in cases where such cost is separately charged; "turnover" used in relation to any dealer liable to tax under this Act means the aggregate of the sale prices received and receivable by him in respect of sales of any goods in the course of inter-State trade or commerce made during any prescribed period and determined in accordance with the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder — Sales Tax — Turnover — Subsidy — Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, S. 5(1)